Mapping the psychosis spectrum - imaging neurosubtypes from multiscale functional network connectivity.

IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Ram Ballem, Pablo Andrés-Camazón, Kyle M Jensen, Prerana Bajracharya, Covadonga M Díaz-Caneja, Juan R Bustillo, Jessica A Turner, Zening Fu, Carol A Tamminga, Brett A Clementz, Matcheri S Keshavan, Elliot S Gershon, Jennifer E McDowell, Sarah K Keedy, Elena I Ivleva, S Kristian Hill, Godfrey D Pearlson, Jiayu Chen, Vince D Calhoun, Armin Iraji
{"title":"Mapping the psychosis spectrum - imaging neurosubtypes from multiscale functional network connectivity.","authors":"Ram Ballem, Pablo Andrés-Camazón, Kyle M Jensen, Prerana Bajracharya, Covadonga M Díaz-Caneja, Juan R Bustillo, Jessica A Turner, Zening Fu, Carol A Tamminga, Brett A Clementz, Matcheri S Keshavan, Elliot S Gershon, Jennifer E McDowell, Sarah K Keedy, Elena I Ivleva, S Kristian Hill, Godfrey D Pearlson, Jiayu Chen, Vince D Calhoun, Armin Iraji","doi":"10.1038/s41380-026-03921-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychosis exhibits marked neurobiological heterogeneity that is not adequately captured by symptom-based diagnoses. Although prior efforts have identified subgroups, it remains unclear how latent disease variability manifests within the brain's multiscale intrinsic functional organization and whether these patterns can be leveraged to systematically identify biologically driven subtypes of psychosis. Here, we aim to identify Psychosis Imaging Neurosubtypes (PINs)-homogeneous subgroups defined solely from neurobiological features of brain function, independent of clinical or cognitive definitions, and whether these subgroups show meaningful phenotypic differentiation. Resting-state fMRI data from 2103 B-SNIP 1&2 participants were used to compute subject-specific multiscale functional network connectivity (msFNC). We then derived a low-dimensional neurobiological subspace, termed Latent Network Connectivity, which captured system-wide interconnected multiscale information across three components. Projections of probands msFNC onto this subspace revealed three PINs through unsupervised learning that spanned DSM diagnoses (Schizophrenia, Bipolar, Schizoaffective Disorder). Although defined purely from intrinsic neurobiology, PINs exhibited distinct cognitive, clinical, and connectivity profiles. PIN-1, the most cognitively impaired, showed Cerebellar-Subcortical and Visual-Sensorimotor hypoconnectivity, alongside Visual-Subcortical hyperconnectivity. Most cognitively preserved PIN-2 showed Visual-Subcortical, Subcortical-Sensorimotor, and Subcortical-Higher Cognition hypoconnectivity. PIN-3 exhibited intermediate cognition, showing Cerebellar-Subcortical hypoconnectivity alongside Cerebellar-Sensorimotor and Subcortical-Sensorimotor hyperconnectivity. Although covariate-adjusted analyses did not reveal significant clinical differences among PINs, exploratory analyses identified selective differences in YMDR, PANSS, and Age of Onset. Notably, 55% of relatives aligned with the same neurosubtype as their probands, a rate significantly higher than chance and than DSM-based alignment, suggesting potential heritability. Cognitive performance reliably aligns with distinct brain connectivity patterns, which are also evident in relatives, supporting their construct validity. Our PINs partially converged with previously reported BSNIP Biotypes with some correspondence (e.g. PIN1 with Biotype 1) but not with the other Biotypes, which were determined using integrated electrophysiological, cognitive, and oculomotor data, supporting convergent validity, while also indicating that intrinsic rsfMRI derived multiscale connectivity partitions psychosis heterogeneity somewhat differently from multimodal biomarker approaches. These findings underscore the limitations of DSM-based classifications in capturing the biological complexity of psychotic disorders and highlight the potential of imaging-based neurosubtypes to enhance our understanding of the psychosis spectrum.</p>","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-026-03921-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychosis exhibits marked neurobiological heterogeneity that is not adequately captured by symptom-based diagnoses. Although prior efforts have identified subgroups, it remains unclear how latent disease variability manifests within the brain's multiscale intrinsic functional organization and whether these patterns can be leveraged to systematically identify biologically driven subtypes of psychosis. Here, we aim to identify Psychosis Imaging Neurosubtypes (PINs)-homogeneous subgroups defined solely from neurobiological features of brain function, independent of clinical or cognitive definitions, and whether these subgroups show meaningful phenotypic differentiation. Resting-state fMRI data from 2103 B-SNIP 1&2 participants were used to compute subject-specific multiscale functional network connectivity (msFNC). We then derived a low-dimensional neurobiological subspace, termed Latent Network Connectivity, which captured system-wide interconnected multiscale information across three components. Projections of probands msFNC onto this subspace revealed three PINs through unsupervised learning that spanned DSM diagnoses (Schizophrenia, Bipolar, Schizoaffective Disorder). Although defined purely from intrinsic neurobiology, PINs exhibited distinct cognitive, clinical, and connectivity profiles. PIN-1, the most cognitively impaired, showed Cerebellar-Subcortical and Visual-Sensorimotor hypoconnectivity, alongside Visual-Subcortical hyperconnectivity. Most cognitively preserved PIN-2 showed Visual-Subcortical, Subcortical-Sensorimotor, and Subcortical-Higher Cognition hypoconnectivity. PIN-3 exhibited intermediate cognition, showing Cerebellar-Subcortical hypoconnectivity alongside Cerebellar-Sensorimotor and Subcortical-Sensorimotor hyperconnectivity. Although covariate-adjusted analyses did not reveal significant clinical differences among PINs, exploratory analyses identified selective differences in YMDR, PANSS, and Age of Onset. Notably, 55% of relatives aligned with the same neurosubtype as their probands, a rate significantly higher than chance and than DSM-based alignment, suggesting potential heritability. Cognitive performance reliably aligns with distinct brain connectivity patterns, which are also evident in relatives, supporting their construct validity. Our PINs partially converged with previously reported BSNIP Biotypes with some correspondence (e.g. PIN1 with Biotype 1) but not with the other Biotypes, which were determined using integrated electrophysiological, cognitive, and oculomotor data, supporting convergent validity, while also indicating that intrinsic rsfMRI derived multiscale connectivity partitions psychosis heterogeneity somewhat differently from multimodal biomarker approaches. These findings underscore the limitations of DSM-based classifications in capturing the biological complexity of psychotic disorders and highlight the potential of imaging-based neurosubtypes to enhance our understanding of the psychosis spectrum.

绘制精神病谱——从多尺度功能网络连接成像神经亚型。
精神病表现出明显的神经生物学异质性,而基于症状的诊断不能充分捕捉到这种异质性。尽管之前的工作已经确定了亚群,但尚不清楚潜伏性疾病变异性如何在大脑的多尺度内在功能组织中表现出来,以及这些模式是否可以被利用来系统地识别生物学驱动的精神病亚型。在这里,我们的目标是确定精神病成像神经亚型(PINs)-仅从脑功能的神经生物学特征定义的同质亚群,独立于临床或认知定义,以及这些亚群是否表现出有意义的表型分化。来自2103名B-SNIP 1和2参与者的静息状态fMRI数据用于计算受试者特定的多尺度功能网络连接(msFNC)。然后,我们推导了一个低维神经生物学子空间,称为潜在网络连接,它捕获了跨三个组件的系统范围内相互连接的多尺度信息。先证者msFNC在这个子空间上的投影通过无监督学习揭示了三个pin,这些pin跨越了DSM诊断(精神分裂症、双相情感障碍、分裂情感障碍)。尽管纯粹从内在神经生物学定义,pin表现出独特的认知、临床和连接概况。认知受损最严重的PIN-1表现为小脑-皮质下和视觉-感觉运动连接不足,同时视觉-皮质下连接过度。大多数保留认知功能的PIN-2表现为视觉-皮质下、皮质下-感觉运动和皮质下-高级认知低连通性。PIN-3表现为中度认知,表现为小脑-皮质下低连通性以及小脑-感觉运动和皮质下-感觉运动超连通性。虽然协变量调整分析没有揭示pin之间的显著临床差异,但探索性分析确定了YMDR、PANSS和发病年龄的选择性差异。值得注意的是,55%的亲属与他们的先证具有相同的神经亚型,这一比率明显高于偶然性和基于dsm的校准,表明潜在的遗传性。认知表现可靠地与不同的大脑连接模式相一致,这在亲属中也很明显,支持了他们的结构效度。我们的pin与先前报道的BSNIP生物型部分收敛,具有一些对应关系(例如PIN1与生物型1),但与其他生物型不一致,这些生物型是通过综合电生理、认知和眼动数据确定的,支持收敛效度,同时也表明内在rsfMRI衍生的多尺度连接划分精神病异质性与多模态生物标志物方法有所不同。这些发现强调了基于dsm的分类在捕捉精神障碍的生物学复杂性方面的局限性,并强调了基于成像的神经亚型的潜力,以增强我们对精神病谱系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书