Opioid use, disability, and patient-reported cognitive impairment in migraine: Multi-country results from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes-International Study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2026-10-10 DOI:10.1111/head.70241
Elizabeth Leroux, Dawn C Buse, Michel Lanteri-Minet, Fumihiko Sakai, Manjit Matharu, Zaza Katsarava, Kristina M Fanning, Karen Carr, Nicole Naccara, Janette Contreras-De Lama, Richard B Lipton
{"title":"Opioid use, disability, and patient-reported cognitive impairment in migraine: Multi-country results from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes-International Study.","authors":"Elizabeth Leroux, Dawn C Buse, Michel Lanteri-Minet, Fumihiko Sakai, Manjit Matharu, Zaza Katsarava, Kristina M Fanning, Karen Carr, Nicole Naccara, Janette Contreras-De Lama, Richard B Lipton","doi":"10.1111/head.70241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the population who do and do not use opioids to treat migraine in the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes-International (CaMEO-I) Study.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids are not recommended for migraine treatment because of efficacy and safety limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a post hoc analysis of CaMEO-I, an international, cross-sectional, observational, Web-based survey conducted in six countries from 2021 to 2022. Migraine status was determined by applying modified International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria, using a validated diagnostic questionnaire. Opioid users were defined as those who used opioids or kept them on hand to treat headache over the previous 30 days. Disability was assessed with the MIDAS, patient-reported cognitive impairment with the Migraine Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (MCIQ), and acute treatment optimization with the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (mTOQ). Multivariable binary logistic regression models evaluated the association between current opioid use and headache-related disability. Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age, gender at birth, current consultation with a headache specialist, education, employment status, and treatment optimization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12,612 respondents with migraine who used prescription or over-the-counter medication for acute treatment of headaches (mean age, 41.8 years; 71.3% female) were included; 23.5% (2965/12,612) used opioids. Rates of opioid use for migraine ranged from 6.3% (127/2023) in Japan to 37.2% (814/2186) in France. The proportions of respondents with moderate to severe disability were higher among opioid users than nonusers at each level of treatment optimization on the mTOQ (very poor [64.7% {123/190} vs. 49.7% {373/750}], poor [62.6% {1110/1772} vs. 46.5% {2208/4747}], moderate [51.0% {338/663} vs. 35.6% {824/2314}], maximum [38.8% {132/340} vs. 19.9% {366/1836}]). Poorer treatment optimization was associated with significantly greater odds of moderate to severe disability (p < 0.001), and opioid use was associated with increased disability across all countries (p < 0.001). Opioid users had higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) patient-reported cognitive impairment scores on the MCIQ than nonusers (61.1 [44.4, 83.3] vs. 50.0 [33.3, 72.2], p < 0.001). Higher proportions of opioid users than nonusers had one or more doctor visits (49.3% [1462/2965] vs. 20.3% [1960/9647]), emergency department/urgent care visits (14.4% [426/2965] vs. 3.5% [336/9647]), and hospital stays (19.4% [571/2949] vs. 4.9% [472/9617]) for headache during the past 6 months (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among CaMEO-I respondents with migraine, opioid users were more likely to have moderate or severe disability and patient-reported cognitive impairment, although causality cannot be determined from cross-sectional analyses. These results support the need for better treatment optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the population who do and do not use opioids to treat migraine in the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes-International (CaMEO-I) Study.

Background: Opioids are not recommended for migraine treatment because of efficacy and safety limitations.

Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of CaMEO-I, an international, cross-sectional, observational, Web-based survey conducted in six countries from 2021 to 2022. Migraine status was determined by applying modified International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria, using a validated diagnostic questionnaire. Opioid users were defined as those who used opioids or kept them on hand to treat headache over the previous 30 days. Disability was assessed with the MIDAS, patient-reported cognitive impairment with the Migraine Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (MCIQ), and acute treatment optimization with the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (mTOQ). Multivariable binary logistic regression models evaluated the association between current opioid use and headache-related disability. Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age, gender at birth, current consultation with a headache specialist, education, employment status, and treatment optimization.

Results: A total of 12,612 respondents with migraine who used prescription or over-the-counter medication for acute treatment of headaches (mean age, 41.8 years; 71.3% female) were included; 23.5% (2965/12,612) used opioids. Rates of opioid use for migraine ranged from 6.3% (127/2023) in Japan to 37.2% (814/2186) in France. The proportions of respondents with moderate to severe disability were higher among opioid users than nonusers at each level of treatment optimization on the mTOQ (very poor [64.7% {123/190} vs. 49.7% {373/750}], poor [62.6% {1110/1772} vs. 46.5% {2208/4747}], moderate [51.0% {338/663} vs. 35.6% {824/2314}], maximum [38.8% {132/340} vs. 19.9% {366/1836}]). Poorer treatment optimization was associated with significantly greater odds of moderate to severe disability (p < 0.001), and opioid use was associated with increased disability across all countries (p < 0.001). Opioid users had higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) patient-reported cognitive impairment scores on the MCIQ than nonusers (61.1 [44.4, 83.3] vs. 50.0 [33.3, 72.2], p < 0.001). Higher proportions of opioid users than nonusers had one or more doctor visits (49.3% [1462/2965] vs. 20.3% [1960/9647]), emergency department/urgent care visits (14.4% [426/2965] vs. 3.5% [336/9647]), and hospital stays (19.4% [571/2949] vs. 4.9% [472/9617]) for headache during the past 6 months (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Among CaMEO-I respondents with migraine, opioid users were more likely to have moderate or severe disability and patient-reported cognitive impairment, although causality cannot be determined from cross-sectional analyses. These results support the need for better treatment optimization.

阿片类药物使用、残疾和偏头痛患者报告的认知障碍:来自慢性偏头痛流行病学和结果的多国结果-国际研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书