Barriers and Strategies for Inclusive Clinical Trials: Focus Group Insights on Inclusivity, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Syamala Buragadda, Eva Friedman, Marie-Annick Clavel, Stuart Nicholls, David Collister, Léa-Mai Simard, Shannon M Ruzycki, Louise Pilote
{"title":"Barriers and Strategies for Inclusive Clinical Trials: Focus Group Insights on Inclusivity, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility.","authors":"Syamala Buragadda, Eva Friedman, Marie-Annick Clavel, Stuart Nicholls, David Collister, Léa-Mai Simard, Shannon M Ruzycki, Louise Pilote","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials are essential for advancing healthcare, yet they often underrepresent key populations, which can limit the applicability of findings to populations for whom interventions are intended and perpetuate inequities in the evidence base. In Canada, practical, context-specific resources to support inclusive trial design and conduct remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore barriers, facilitators, and strategies related to equitable participation in Canadian clinical trials and to gather stakeholder input to inform development of an Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility (IDEA) toolkit for researchers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two in-person qualitative focus groups with 20 stakeholders, including researchers, healthcare providers, patient partners, Indigenous representatives, and other participants with lived or professional experience relevant to clinical-trial participation. Audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed in NVivo 15 using an inductive thematic-analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants identified five barriers to inclusive participation: lack of trust; limited clinical-trial knowledge and health research literacy; language and communication challenges; logistical and regulatory challenges; and study burden and gatekeeping. Facilitators included community engagement, culturally relevant representation and outreach, multilingual and accessible materials, flexible and accessible trial delivery, and recruitment and retention supports. Stakeholders also identified priorities for a practical, modular Canadian IDEA toolkit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This exploratory study identifies structural, relational, and operational factors that shape inclusive trial participation and provides context-informed priorities for an IDEA toolkit. The findings are not intended to represent all underserved communities, but they offer practical lessons that can be adapted across trial settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"112551"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112551","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials are essential for advancing healthcare, yet they often underrepresent key populations, which can limit the applicability of findings to populations for whom interventions are intended and perpetuate inequities in the evidence base. In Canada, practical, context-specific resources to support inclusive trial design and conduct remain limited.

Objective: To explore barriers, facilitators, and strategies related to equitable participation in Canadian clinical trials and to gather stakeholder input to inform development of an Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility (IDEA) toolkit for researchers.

Methods: We conducted two in-person qualitative focus groups with 20 stakeholders, including researchers, healthcare providers, patient partners, Indigenous representatives, and other participants with lived or professional experience relevant to clinical-trial participation. Audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed in NVivo 15 using an inductive thematic-analysis approach.

Results: Participants identified five barriers to inclusive participation: lack of trust; limited clinical-trial knowledge and health research literacy; language and communication challenges; logistical and regulatory challenges; and study burden and gatekeeping. Facilitators included community engagement, culturally relevant representation and outreach, multilingual and accessible materials, flexible and accessible trial delivery, and recruitment and retention supports. Stakeholders also identified priorities for a practical, modular Canadian IDEA toolkit.

Conclusion: This exploratory study identifies structural, relational, and operational factors that shape inclusive trial participation and provides context-informed priorities for an IDEA toolkit. The findings are not intended to represent all underserved communities, but they offer practical lessons that can be adapted across trial settings.

包容性临床试验的障碍和策略:焦点小组对包容性、多样性、公平性和可及性的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书