Yusuf Karancı, Fulya Çiyiltepe, Gizem Akçın, Halil Beggi
{"title":"Bedside monitoring of the vascular response to norepinephrine in early septic shock: VNERi trajectories and comparison with dynamic clinical measures.","authors":"Yusuf Karancı, Fulya Çiyiltepe, Gizem Akçın, Halil Beggi","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01516-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The vascular norepinephrine response index [VNERi = diastolic arterial pressure / (norepinephrine dose × heart rate)] is a bedside index computed from already-monitored signals. It has been studied only at baseline. We described its 48-hour course and tested whether it adds prognostic information beyond dynamic clinical measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied a single-center prospective cohort of 94 adults with septic shock started on first-line norepinephrine. VNERi was computed at hours T0-T48. Course parameters (mean level, minimum, slope) were compared for 28-day mortality against the change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (ΔSOFA) and lactate clearance, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the DeLong test, nested logistic regression, and time-dependent Cox regression adjusted for time-varying SOFA(t) and lactate(t). Phenotypes came from a latent class mixed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mortality was 32% (30/94). Baseline VNERi did not separate outcomes (AUC 0.59; most had a preserved response). The course parameters did (mean-level AUC 0.73) but did not outperform ΔSOFA (AUC 0.84, window-matched DeLong p = 0.02). Added to a dynamic clinical model, VNERi gave a small gain (integrated discrimination improvement 0.05-0.06, likelihood-ratio p ≈ 0.02). In time-dependent Cox, a higher VNERi(t) was linked to survival (hazard ratio 0.48) but weakened to non-significance after adjusting for SOFA(t) (0.68, p = 0.08). Three exploratory course phenotypes separated survival (log-rank p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serial bedside VNERi monitoring is feasible and carries a partly independent signal that adds a small amount to dynamic clinical severity without outperforming it. These findings are hypothesis-generating and need validation in a hyporesponsive population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01516-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The vascular norepinephrine response index [VNERi = diastolic arterial pressure / (norepinephrine dose × heart rate)] is a bedside index computed from already-monitored signals. It has been studied only at baseline. We described its 48-hour course and tested whether it adds prognostic information beyond dynamic clinical measures.
Methods: We studied a single-center prospective cohort of 94 adults with septic shock started on first-line norepinephrine. VNERi was computed at hours T0-T48. Course parameters (mean level, minimum, slope) were compared for 28-day mortality against the change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (ΔSOFA) and lactate clearance, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the DeLong test, nested logistic regression, and time-dependent Cox regression adjusted for time-varying SOFA(t) and lactate(t). Phenotypes came from a latent class mixed model.
Results: Mortality was 32% (30/94). Baseline VNERi did not separate outcomes (AUC 0.59; most had a preserved response). The course parameters did (mean-level AUC 0.73) but did not outperform ΔSOFA (AUC 0.84, window-matched DeLong p = 0.02). Added to a dynamic clinical model, VNERi gave a small gain (integrated discrimination improvement 0.05-0.06, likelihood-ratio p ≈ 0.02). In time-dependent Cox, a higher VNERi(t) was linked to survival (hazard ratio 0.48) but weakened to non-significance after adjusting for SOFA(t) (0.68, p = 0.08). Three exploratory course phenotypes separated survival (log-rank p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Serial bedside VNERi monitoring is feasible and carries a partly independent signal that adds a small amount to dynamic clinical severity without outperforming it. These findings are hypothesis-generating and need validation in a hyporesponsive population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.