Informing an mpox stockpile investment case: epidemiological modelling and cost-benefit analysis.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dionne Mitcham, Richard Bruns, Hannah Goodtree, Elizabeth Campbell, Alison Kelly, Oluremilekun Oyefolu, Haley Wellham, Fatima N Ameaka, Sarah Gillani, Sarah Schneider-Firestone, Amanda Hart, Caitlin Rivers, Nivedita Saksena, Ignacio Esteban, Lassané Kaboré, Simon Allan, Allyson L Russell, Francisco J Luquero, Neil J Saad Duque, Crystal R Watson
{"title":"Informing an mpox stockpile investment case: epidemiological modelling and cost-benefit analysis.","authors":"Dionne Mitcham, Richard Bruns, Hannah Goodtree, Elizabeth Campbell, Alison Kelly, Oluremilekun Oyefolu, Haley Wellham, Fatima N Ameaka, Sarah Gillani, Sarah Schneider-Firestone, Amanda Hart, Caitlin Rivers, Nivedita Saksena, Ignacio Esteban, Lassané Kaboré, Simon Allan, Allyson L Russell, Francisco J Luquero, Neil J Saad Duque, Crystal R Watson","doi":"10.1016/j.langlo.2026.104069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to ongoing mpox outbreaks, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, was considering funding the establishment of an mpox vaccine stockpile. To support their decision making, Gavi commissioned the Center for Outbreak Response Innovation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health to estimate the optimal size, impact, health benefits, and monetised net benefits of different mpox vaccine stockpile sizes for an effective global stockpile to support outbreak containment and prevention of widespread mpox transmission. We aimed to quantify the potential impact of vaccination on future mpox outbreaks to inform Gavi's decision making for investing in an effective mpox vaccine stockpile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A deterministic compartmental model of mpox transmission with vaccine interventions was developed, including intervening rapidly-at 20 cases reported-versus at 100 cases reported. The model was used to assess potential vaccine-based mitigation strategies for mpox outbreaks in Gavi-eligible countries by simulating mpox transmission and control dynamics, given two vaccination strategies (one dose and two doses) compared with no intervention in high-risk groups and contacts of cases, across four distinct subpopulations: (1) children younger than 5 years, (2) men who have sex with men, (3) female sex workers, and (4) the remaining general population. The findings from this model were incorporated into a Monte Carlo cost-benefit analysis of different stockpile sizes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Rapid response (ie, intervening at 20 cases reported) using a single-dose vaccination strategy provided the greatest benefits relative to costs compared with a two-dose strategy. Using a one-dose strategy, expected net benefits were estimated to be over US$81 million to $220 million higher when responding to outbreaks rapidly than when responding after 100 cases. Furthermore, the total cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted with rapid response using a one-dose vaccine strategy responding at 20 cases was 18% to 53% lower than a one-dose strategy introduced at 100 cases. A stockpile of 1 000 000 doses had the highest ratio of benefits to costs.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A stockpile calibrated to attain a high ratio of benefits to costs can be effective in controlling outbreaks and reducing overall negative health impacts. The cost-effectiveness of mpox vaccine stockpiles could be further maximised with reduced vaccine pricing and dose-sparing strategies.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":" ","pages":"104069"},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langlo.2026.104069","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In response to ongoing mpox outbreaks, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, was considering funding the establishment of an mpox vaccine stockpile. To support their decision making, Gavi commissioned the Center for Outbreak Response Innovation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health to estimate the optimal size, impact, health benefits, and monetised net benefits of different mpox vaccine stockpile sizes for an effective global stockpile to support outbreak containment and prevention of widespread mpox transmission. We aimed to quantify the potential impact of vaccination on future mpox outbreaks to inform Gavi's decision making for investing in an effective mpox vaccine stockpile.

Methods: A deterministic compartmental model of mpox transmission with vaccine interventions was developed, including intervening rapidly-at 20 cases reported-versus at 100 cases reported. The model was used to assess potential vaccine-based mitigation strategies for mpox outbreaks in Gavi-eligible countries by simulating mpox transmission and control dynamics, given two vaccination strategies (one dose and two doses) compared with no intervention in high-risk groups and contacts of cases, across four distinct subpopulations: (1) children younger than 5 years, (2) men who have sex with men, (3) female sex workers, and (4) the remaining general population. The findings from this model were incorporated into a Monte Carlo cost-benefit analysis of different stockpile sizes.

Findings: Rapid response (ie, intervening at 20 cases reported) using a single-dose vaccination strategy provided the greatest benefits relative to costs compared with a two-dose strategy. Using a one-dose strategy, expected net benefits were estimated to be over US$81 million to $220 million higher when responding to outbreaks rapidly than when responding after 100 cases. Furthermore, the total cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted with rapid response using a one-dose vaccine strategy responding at 20 cases was 18% to 53% lower than a one-dose strategy introduced at 100 cases. A stockpile of 1 000 000 doses had the highest ratio of benefits to costs.

Interpretation: A stockpile calibrated to attain a high ratio of benefits to costs can be effective in controlling outbreaks and reducing overall negative health impacts. The cost-effectiveness of mpox vaccine stockpiles could be further maximised with reduced vaccine pricing and dose-sparing strategies.

Funding: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.

通报麻疹储存投资案例:流行病学建模和成本效益分析。
背景:为应对持续的麻疹疫情,全球疫苗免疫联盟正在考虑为建立麻疹疫苗储备提供资金。为了支持他们的决策,全球疫苗免疫联盟委托约翰霍普金斯大学彭博公共卫生学院的疫情应对创新中心估计不同的痘疫苗储备规模的最佳规模、影响、健康效益和货币化净效益,以建立有效的全球储备,支持疫情控制和预防痘病毒的广泛传播。我们的目标是量化疫苗接种对未来m痘疫情的潜在影响,以便为全球疫苗免疫联盟投资建立有效的m痘疫苗储备的决策提供信息。方法:通过疫苗干预建立了m痘传播的确定性区室模型,包括快速干预(20例报告)和100例报告。在四个不同的亚人群中(1)5岁以下儿童、(2)男男性行为者、(3)女性性工作者和(4)其余的普通人群中,通过模拟接种两种疫苗策略(一剂和两剂)与不采取干预措施的高危人群和病例接触者相比,该模型用于评估符合gavi条件的国家中m痘疫情的潜在基于疫苗的缓解策略。该模型的结果被纳入不同库存规模的蒙特卡洛成本效益分析。研究结果:与两剂疫苗策略相比,使用单剂疫苗策略的快速反应(即在报告的20例病例时进行干预)提供了最大的成本效益。使用一次剂量战略,与在100个病例之后作出反应相比,迅速应对疫情的预期净效益估计高出8100万至2.2亿美元。此外,采用一剂疫苗策略对20例病例作出反应的快速反应所避免的每个残疾调整生命年(DALY)的总成本比采用一剂疫苗策略对100例病例作出反应的快速反应低18%至53%。储备100万剂的效益与成本之比最高。解释:经过校准以实现高效益与成本之比的储备可有效控制疫情并减少总体负面健康影响。通过降低疫苗定价和节约剂量战略,可以进一步最大限度地提高m痘疫苗库存的成本效益。资助:全球疫苗免疫联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书