Rebecca Dantas Thorp, Andrea Dória Batista, Carolline A Mariz, Lilian Rose Maia Gomes de Araújo, George Tadeu Nunes Diniz, Ana Virgínia Matos Sá Barreto, Clarice Neueschwander Lins de Morais, Paula Carolina Valença Silva, Ana Lúcia Coutinho Domingues, Edmundo Pessoa Lopes
{"title":"Evaluating periportal fibrosis in schistosomiasis mansoni using the ELF [Enhanced Liver Fibrosis] score: A pilot study.","authors":"Rebecca Dantas Thorp, Andrea Dória Batista, Carolline A Mariz, Lilian Rose Maia Gomes de Araújo, George Tadeu Nunes Diniz, Ana Virgínia Matos Sá Barreto, Clarice Neueschwander Lins de Morais, Paula Carolina Valença Silva, Ana Lúcia Coutinho Domingues, Edmundo Pessoa Lopes","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0014775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring the periportal fibrosis pattern (PPF) in schistosomiasis mansoni (SM) is essential for diagnosing portal hypertension. The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test can be used to quantify liver fibrosis, however, few studies have been done in SM. This study evaluated serum ELF value according to the PPF pattern established by the Niamey ultrasound classification (US) and history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in patients with SM.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional, bidirectional analytical study was carried out with patients from an endemic area and from a reference outpatient clinic for SM. A structured questionnaire was applied to collect sociodemographic and clinical data, and blood samples were collected for ELF determination. US was performed by the same examiner.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Among the 196 patients evaluated (58% women; mean age of 45.04 years ± 15.30 years) 18 (%) presented with Niamey US pattern A + B; 64 (%) pattern C; 56 (%) pattern D; 49 (%) pattern E and 9 (%) pattern F. The median ELF values were higher the greater the PPF intensity: 8.36 in A + B; 8.40 in C; 8.64 in D; 8.99 in E and 9.75 in F Niamey pattern (p = 0.0021). There was no difference in the mean ELF serum value between patients with and without history of UGIB. The ELF was able to differentiate patients without PPF, with mild, moderate and advanced PPF: A + B vs C vs D vs E + F (p = 0.0024), as well as patients with advanced PPF from those without fibrosis or with moderate fibrosis: A + B vs E + F (p = 0.0464) and C + D vs E + F (P = 0.0007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion/ /significance: </strong>The ELF test demonstrated potential as a tool for assessing PPF in SM patients, as it could differentiate those with minimal fibrosis from those with moderate or advanced fibrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49000,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":"20 10","pages":"e0014775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13671643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Measuring the periportal fibrosis pattern (PPF) in schistosomiasis mansoni (SM) is essential for diagnosing portal hypertension. The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test can be used to quantify liver fibrosis, however, few studies have been done in SM. This study evaluated serum ELF value according to the PPF pattern established by the Niamey ultrasound classification (US) and history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in patients with SM.
Methodology: A cross-sectional, bidirectional analytical study was carried out with patients from an endemic area and from a reference outpatient clinic for SM. A structured questionnaire was applied to collect sociodemographic and clinical data, and blood samples were collected for ELF determination. US was performed by the same examiner.
Principal findings: Among the 196 patients evaluated (58% women; mean age of 45.04 years ± 15.30 years) 18 (%) presented with Niamey US pattern A + B; 64 (%) pattern C; 56 (%) pattern D; 49 (%) pattern E and 9 (%) pattern F. The median ELF values were higher the greater the PPF intensity: 8.36 in A + B; 8.40 in C; 8.64 in D; 8.99 in E and 9.75 in F Niamey pattern (p = 0.0021). There was no difference in the mean ELF serum value between patients with and without history of UGIB. The ELF was able to differentiate patients without PPF, with mild, moderate and advanced PPF: A + B vs C vs D vs E + F (p = 0.0024), as well as patients with advanced PPF from those without fibrosis or with moderate fibrosis: A + B vs E + F (p = 0.0464) and C + D vs E + F (P = 0.0007).
Conclusion/ /significance: The ELF test demonstrated potential as a tool for assessing PPF in SM patients, as it could differentiate those with minimal fibrosis from those with moderate or advanced fibrosis.
背景:测量曼氏血吸虫病(SM)患者门静脉周围纤维化模式(PPF)对诊断门静脉高压症至关重要。增强肝纤维化(Enhanced Liver Fibrosis, ELF)试验可用于量化肝纤维化,然而,在SM中进行的研究很少。本研究根据Niamey超声分类(US)建立的PPF模式和SM患者的上消化道出血(UGIB)史评估血清ELF值。方法:对来自流行地区和参考门诊的SM患者进行横断面、双向分析研究。采用结构化问卷收集社会人口学和临床资料,并采集血样进行ELF测定。US是由同一个审查员完成的。主要发现:196例患者中(58%为女性,平均年龄45.04±15.30岁)18例(%)表现为美国尼亚美A + B型;64(%)模式C;D型56例(%);E型49 (%),f型9(%)。PPF强度越大,ELF中位数越高:A + B组为8.36;8.40 in C;8.64 in D;E组为8.99,F组为9.75 (p = 0.0021)。有和无UGIB病史患者的平均ELF血清值无差异。ELF能够区分无PPF、轻度、中度和晚期PPF患者:A + B vs C vs D vs E + F (p = 0.0024),以及晚期PPF患者与无纤维化或中度纤维化患者:A + B vs E + F (p = 0.0464)和C + D vs E + F (p = 0.0007)。结论/ /意义:ELF测试显示了作为评估SM患者PPF的工具的潜力,因为它可以区分轻度纤维化与中度或晚期纤维化。
期刊介绍:
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy.
The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability.
All aspects of these diseases are considered, including:
Pathogenesis
Clinical features
Pharmacology and treatment
Diagnosis
Epidemiology
Vector biology
Vaccinology and prevention
Demographic, ecological and social determinants
Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).