Beyond a cancer stem cell marker: molecular state dependent functions of CD133 and state targeted therapy.

IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Lin Cheng, Jingyan Wang, Yaqiong Liu, Timothy O'Brien, Janusz Krawczyk, Laura Barkley, Shanye Yin, Sanbing Shen, JunPeng Li, Sifang Zhang
{"title":"Beyond a cancer stem cell marker: molecular state dependent functions of CD133 and state targeted therapy.","authors":"Lin Cheng, Jingyan Wang, Yaqiong Liu, Timothy O'Brien, Janusz Krawczyk, Laura Barkley, Shanye Yin, Sanbing Shen, JunPeng Li, Sifang Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s40364-026-01013-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CD133 (prominin-1) is among the most widely used cancer stem cell markers, yet two decades of research have yielded persistent contradictions: CD133-negative cells can be tumorigenic, CD133-positive and -negative states can interconvert, and CD133 perturbation produces opposing phenotypes across models, while CD133 directed therapies have encountered toxicities consistent with on-target/off-tumor effects. We propose that these inconsistencies share a common origin: CD133 positivity does not define a homogeneous functional entity. Rather, the functional identity of CD133 is jointly encoded by PROM1 alternative splicing, post translational modification combinations, and subcellular localization. Depending on this molecular state, the same protein can support stemness, drive migration and invasion, sustain quiescence like states, suppress autophagy, or be exported as vesicular signals that remodel the tumor microenvironment. CD133 is therefore better understood not as a static marker with a fixed function, but as a state dependent functional integrator, in which detected expression need not reflect pathogenic function. This distinction matters therapeutically: eliminating CD133-positive cells and disrupting pathogenic CD133 states are not equivalent objectives. CD133 directed therapy should accordingly shift from marker targeting to state targeting, guided by a state resolved stratification scheme that matches isoform-, phosphorylation-, glycosylation- and localization- defined CD133 states to rational interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54225,"journal":{"name":"Biomarker Research","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13651184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarker Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-026-01013-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CD133 (prominin-1) is among the most widely used cancer stem cell markers, yet two decades of research have yielded persistent contradictions: CD133-negative cells can be tumorigenic, CD133-positive and -negative states can interconvert, and CD133 perturbation produces opposing phenotypes across models, while CD133 directed therapies have encountered toxicities consistent with on-target/off-tumor effects. We propose that these inconsistencies share a common origin: CD133 positivity does not define a homogeneous functional entity. Rather, the functional identity of CD133 is jointly encoded by PROM1 alternative splicing, post translational modification combinations, and subcellular localization. Depending on this molecular state, the same protein can support stemness, drive migration and invasion, sustain quiescence like states, suppress autophagy, or be exported as vesicular signals that remodel the tumor microenvironment. CD133 is therefore better understood not as a static marker with a fixed function, but as a state dependent functional integrator, in which detected expression need not reflect pathogenic function. This distinction matters therapeutically: eliminating CD133-positive cells and disrupting pathogenic CD133 states are not equivalent objectives. CD133 directed therapy should accordingly shift from marker targeting to state targeting, guided by a state resolved stratification scheme that matches isoform-, phosphorylation-, glycosylation- and localization- defined CD133 states to rational interventions.

超越癌症干细胞标志物:CD133的分子状态依赖功能和状态靶向治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomarker Research
Biomarker Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
1.80%
发文量
80
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomarker Research, an open-access, peer-reviewed journal, covers all aspects of biomarker investigation. It seeks to publish original discoveries, novel concepts, commentaries, and reviews across various biomedical disciplines. The field of biomarker research has progressed significantly with the rise of personalized medicine and individual health. Biomarkers play a crucial role in drug discovery and development, as well as in disease diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and prevention, particularly in the genome era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书