Narrative review of pharmacologic and interventional strategies for cancer pain management in adults with incurable disease.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing
Giuliano Lo Bianco, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Sebastiano Mercadante
{"title":"Narrative review of pharmacologic and interventional strategies for cancer pain management in adults with incurable disease.","authors":"Giuliano Lo Bianco, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Sebastiano Mercadante","doi":"10.21037/apm-2026-0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Cancer pain affects 55-95% of patients with advanced malignancy and remains inadequately controlled in approximately two-thirds of those with metastatic disease. Management is shifting toward a multimodal, mechanism-based and personalised approach. This narrative review summarises current evidence and international guideline recommendations on cancer pain management in adults, with a clinical focus on incurable disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2026, supplemented by handsearching of international oncology, palliative-care and pain-medicine guidelines and of the 2025 multi-society consensus on opioid conversion. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised trials and current guidelines were prioritised.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Opioids are indicated for moderate-to-severe pain caused by cancer or its treatment and in palliative care; this indication should not be extrapolated to chronic non-cancer pain, where their benefit is small and comparable to non-opioid alternatives. The distinction is mechanistic: µ-opioid receptor agonism damps transmission from intact, continuously driven nociceptors, whereas nerve injury dismantles part of that target, so that antidepressants and anticonvulsants-not opioids-are first-line for neuropathic pain; methadone, buprenorphine, tapentadol and tramadol are partial exceptions owing to their additional non-opioid mechanisms. Titration and rotation remain central, with conversion ratios used as a starting framework rather than a fixed rule. Methadone, including intravenously, is valuable in neuropathic and opioid-refractory pain under specialist oversight. Rapid-onset transmucosal fentanyl outperforms oral morphine for breakthrough pain. Evidence does not support routine use of cannabinoids. Intrathecal drug delivery benefits carefully selected refractory patients, but the limitations of the published literature highlight the risk of premature procedural escalation before systemic optimisation. Non-pharmacologic interventions, palliative radiotherapy and pharmacogenomic-guided prescribing complete the framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective cancer pain management combines mechanism-based pharmacotherapy with evidence-informed interventional strategies and psychosocial support. Methadone, intrathecal therapy and emerging biased agonists each have a defined place, but none replaces clinical judgement and prior optimisation of systemic therapy. Restrictive frameworks developed for chronic non-cancer pain should not be applied to incurable cancer, where under-treatment remains the dominant risk; conversely, opioid efficacy in cancer pain does not endorse their use in non-cancer, particularly neuropathic, pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":"15 5","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-2026-0066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Cancer pain affects 55-95% of patients with advanced malignancy and remains inadequately controlled in approximately two-thirds of those with metastatic disease. Management is shifting toward a multimodal, mechanism-based and personalised approach. This narrative review summarises current evidence and international guideline recommendations on cancer pain management in adults, with a clinical focus on incurable disease.

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2026, supplemented by handsearching of international oncology, palliative-care and pain-medicine guidelines and of the 2025 multi-society consensus on opioid conversion. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised trials and current guidelines were prioritised.

Key content and findings: Opioids are indicated for moderate-to-severe pain caused by cancer or its treatment and in palliative care; this indication should not be extrapolated to chronic non-cancer pain, where their benefit is small and comparable to non-opioid alternatives. The distinction is mechanistic: µ-opioid receptor agonism damps transmission from intact, continuously driven nociceptors, whereas nerve injury dismantles part of that target, so that antidepressants and anticonvulsants-not opioids-are first-line for neuropathic pain; methadone, buprenorphine, tapentadol and tramadol are partial exceptions owing to their additional non-opioid mechanisms. Titration and rotation remain central, with conversion ratios used as a starting framework rather than a fixed rule. Methadone, including intravenously, is valuable in neuropathic and opioid-refractory pain under specialist oversight. Rapid-onset transmucosal fentanyl outperforms oral morphine for breakthrough pain. Evidence does not support routine use of cannabinoids. Intrathecal drug delivery benefits carefully selected refractory patients, but the limitations of the published literature highlight the risk of premature procedural escalation before systemic optimisation. Non-pharmacologic interventions, palliative radiotherapy and pharmacogenomic-guided prescribing complete the framework.

Conclusions: Effective cancer pain management combines mechanism-based pharmacotherapy with evidence-informed interventional strategies and psychosocial support. Methadone, intrathecal therapy and emerging biased agonists each have a defined place, but none replaces clinical judgement and prior optimisation of systemic therapy. Restrictive frameworks developed for chronic non-cancer pain should not be applied to incurable cancer, where under-treatment remains the dominant risk; conversely, opioid efficacy in cancer pain does not endorse their use in non-cancer, particularly neuropathic, pain.

成人不治之症癌症疼痛管理的药理学和介入策略的叙述性回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书