Prehospital Variables Do Not Reliably Identify Pelvic Fracture Morphologies Amenable to Pelvic Binder Application: A Retrospective Imaging Review.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Maximilian P Forssten, Hayder Saleh Al Saadi, Amin El Helw, Vettikkattil Joseph Simon, Marcelo Af Ribeiro, Neev Trehan, Sebastian P Forssten, Ravi Trehan, Shahin Mohseni
{"title":"Prehospital Variables Do Not Reliably Identify Pelvic Fracture Morphologies Amenable to Pelvic Binder Application: A Retrospective Imaging Review.","authors":"Maximilian P Forssten, Hayder Saleh Al Saadi, Amin El Helw, Vettikkattil Joseph Simon, Marcelo Af Ribeiro, Neev Trehan, Sebastian P Forssten, Ravi Trehan, Shahin Mohseni","doi":"10.1177/00031348261494137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPelvic binders are used in prehospital settings for early stabilization when pelvic fractures are suspected. Although a rapid and cost-effective tool, uncertainties persist regarding their use prior to radiological confirmation of pelvic fracture.MethodsA review of adult patients with a pelvic fracture requiring trauma team activation who were admitted to a tertiary trauma center between 2020 and 2023 was conducted. The radiological studies were reviewed by four consultant orthopedic surgeons and were classified according to whether the application of a pelvic binder would be mechanically favorable, neutral, or potentially unfavorable. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the ability of specific physiologic and injury-related variables (hypotension, tachycardia, shock index, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale, and mechanism of injury) to discriminate pelvic fracture morphologies for which pelvic binder application would be favorable.ResultsA total of 298 patients were included in the current investigation. Of these patients, applying a pelvic binder was favorable in 17% of cases (95% CI: 13%-22%, N = 50), would be mechanically neutral in 28% of cases (95% CI: 23%-33%, N = 82), and was potentially unfavorable in 56% of cases (95% CI: 50%-61%, N = 166) (<i>P</i> < .001). All investigated variables demonstrated limited discriminatory ability for identifying patients for whom pelvic binder application was favorable, with most AUCs <0.60. The highest predictive performance was observed for the ISS [AUC (95% CI): 0.65 (0.58-0.73)].ConclusionIn trauma patients with CT-confirmed pelvic ring injuries, readily available prehospital variables such as hemodynamic instability, associated injury patterns, and mechanism of injury appear to be insufficient for reliably identifying patients with a fracture morphology that could be amenable to pelvic binder application.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261494137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261494137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPelvic binders are used in prehospital settings for early stabilization when pelvic fractures are suspected. Although a rapid and cost-effective tool, uncertainties persist regarding their use prior to radiological confirmation of pelvic fracture.MethodsA review of adult patients with a pelvic fracture requiring trauma team activation who were admitted to a tertiary trauma center between 2020 and 2023 was conducted. The radiological studies were reviewed by four consultant orthopedic surgeons and were classified according to whether the application of a pelvic binder would be mechanically favorable, neutral, or potentially unfavorable. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the ability of specific physiologic and injury-related variables (hypotension, tachycardia, shock index, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale, and mechanism of injury) to discriminate pelvic fracture morphologies for which pelvic binder application would be favorable.ResultsA total of 298 patients were included in the current investigation. Of these patients, applying a pelvic binder was favorable in 17% of cases (95% CI: 13%-22%, N = 50), would be mechanically neutral in 28% of cases (95% CI: 23%-33%, N = 82), and was potentially unfavorable in 56% of cases (95% CI: 50%-61%, N = 166) (P < .001). All investigated variables demonstrated limited discriminatory ability for identifying patients for whom pelvic binder application was favorable, with most AUCs <0.60. The highest predictive performance was observed for the ISS [AUC (95% CI): 0.65 (0.58-0.73)].ConclusionIn trauma patients with CT-confirmed pelvic ring injuries, readily available prehospital variables such as hemodynamic instability, associated injury patterns, and mechanism of injury appear to be insufficient for reliably identifying patients with a fracture morphology that could be amenable to pelvic binder application.

院前变量不能可靠地识别骨盆骨折形态,适合骨盆粘合剂应用:回顾性影像学回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书