Slow-release peat-urea fertilizer increased sweet corn yield and nitrogen use efficiency compared to urea

IF 2.1 Q3 AGRONOMY
Ummya Habiba, Md. Kafil Uddin, Sumaya Nahian, Md. Al Arafat, Biplob Kumar Saha
{"title":"Slow-release peat-urea fertilizer increased sweet corn yield and nitrogen use efficiency compared to urea","authors":"Ummya Habiba,&nbsp;Md. Kafil Uddin,&nbsp;Sumaya Nahian,&nbsp;Md. Al Arafat,&nbsp;Biplob Kumar Saha","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nitrogen (N) use efficiency of urea is often low, resulting in inefficient N utilization. Again, peat, a high organic carbon (OC)-containing soil, is considered a problematic soil. However, enriching peat with urea may release fertilizer N slowly, and its application to agricultural soil can sequester OC in the soil. So, this experiment was undertaken to evaluate the effects of peat-urea (PU) fertilizer on N release, post-harvest soil health, growth, yield, N uptake, and use efficiency of sweet corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) compared with urea. Two PU (PU-I and PU-II) granules were formulated, having a C/N ratio of 1.95 and 2.61, respectively. The size, moisture content, and crush strength of PU granules reflect their feasibility for field application. The Fourier transform infrared analysis confirms the urea-N loading in the peat matrix. The N release was slower from PU than from urea. In the pot trial, urea, PU-I, and PU-II were applied at 100% and 75% of the recommended dose of N. PU application resulted in significantly higher chlorophyll, cob yield, and N uptake by sweet corn compared to the sole application of urea. Compared to urea, application of PU increased the cob yield by 23% and N uptake by 21%. The higher N uptake in PU-treated plants facilitated 15.16% higher N use efficiency and 13.85% higher fertilizer N use efficiency of sweet corn than urea. In addition, the total N and OC in the post-harvest soil also increased considerably due to PU application compared to urea.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70467","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) use efficiency of urea is often low, resulting in inefficient N utilization. Again, peat, a high organic carbon (OC)-containing soil, is considered a problematic soil. However, enriching peat with urea may release fertilizer N slowly, and its application to agricultural soil can sequester OC in the soil. So, this experiment was undertaken to evaluate the effects of peat-urea (PU) fertilizer on N release, post-harvest soil health, growth, yield, N uptake, and use efficiency of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) compared with urea. Two PU (PU-I and PU-II) granules were formulated, having a C/N ratio of 1.95 and 2.61, respectively. The size, moisture content, and crush strength of PU granules reflect their feasibility for field application. The Fourier transform infrared analysis confirms the urea-N loading in the peat matrix. The N release was slower from PU than from urea. In the pot trial, urea, PU-I, and PU-II were applied at 100% and 75% of the recommended dose of N. PU application resulted in significantly higher chlorophyll, cob yield, and N uptake by sweet corn compared to the sole application of urea. Compared to urea, application of PU increased the cob yield by 23% and N uptake by 21%. The higher N uptake in PU-treated plants facilitated 15.16% higher N use efficiency and 13.85% higher fertilizer N use efficiency of sweet corn than urea. In addition, the total N and OC in the post-harvest soil also increased considerably due to PU application compared to urea.

与尿素相比,缓释泥炭-尿素肥提高了甜玉米产量和氮素利用效率
尿素氮素利用效率往往较低,导致氮素利用效率低下。泥炭是一种高有机碳(OC)含量的土壤,被认为是有问题的土壤。然而,用尿素富集泥炭会使氮肥释放缓慢,而在农业土壤中施用尿素可以固存土壤中的有机碳。因此,本试验旨在评价与尿素相比,泥炭尿素(PU)肥对甜玉米(Zea mays L.)氮素释放、收获后土壤健康、生长、产量、氮素吸收和利用效率的影响。制备了两种PU (PU- i和PU- ii)颗粒,其碳氮比分别为1.95和2.61。PU颗粒的粒度、含水率和抗压强度反映了其在现场应用的可行性。傅里叶变换红外分析证实了泥炭基质中尿素- n的加载。PU释放氮的速度比尿素慢。在盆栽试验中,施用100%和75%推荐施氮量的尿素、PU- i和PU- ii,与单独施用尿素相比,施用PU显著提高了甜玉米的叶绿素含量、穗轴产量和氮素吸收量。与尿素相比,施用PU可使穗轴产量提高23%,氮素吸收量提高21%。与尿素相比,pu处理玉米氮素利用率提高了15.16%,肥氮利用率提高了13.85%。此外,与尿素相比,施用PU也显著增加了采后土壤的总氮和总OC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书