Qiang Yue, Qian Wang, Changshuang Bai, ZhaoXue Li, Li Zhao
{"title":"Multi-Modal Transformer Framework for Automated Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading From Radiographs","authors":"Qiang Yue, Qian Wang, Changshuang Bai, ZhaoXue Li, Li Zhao","doi":"10.1002/ima.70450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To develop and validate a multi-modal, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven framework for automated grading of knee osteoarthritis severity from radiographs, integrating advanced detection, deep learning, radiomics, and clinical data. A total of 2290 patients from five medical centers were included, split into an internal cohort (<i>n</i> = 1549) and an external test set (<i>n</i> = 741). Knee radiographs were preprocessed with histogram normalization, contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), and noise filtering. Four detection models, RT-DETR, SAM, DINOv2 + ViTDet, and Grounded-SAM/MedSAM, were evaluated for anatomical localization, with Grounded-SAM/MedSAM selected for optimal intersection over union (IoU) and mean average precision (mAP). Radiomic features (<i>n</i> = 215) were extracted from detected regions of interest (ROIs) using the Standardized Environment for Radiomics Analysis (SERA) platform, while deep features were derived from four advanced extractors, with MedSAM + feature aggregator selected for highest classification accuracy. Features underwent harmonization, variance filtering, and selection via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), principal component analysis (PCA), or mutual information. Clinical, radiomic, and deep features were fused and classified using CoAtNet, ConvNeXt V2, EfficientNetV2, RepLKNet, and Swin V2 Transformers. Model selection was performed within a nested cross-validation scheme on the internal cohort, and the external cohort was accessed only once after the final configuration had been fixed. Model performance was assessed by accuracy, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with interpretability provided by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and a nomogram. Grounded-SAM/MedSAM achieved the highest detection performance (external IoU = 90.83% [95% confidence interval, CI, 89.41–92.15], mAP = 93.67% [95% CI 92.38–94.82]). MedSAM deep features outperformed others (external F1 = 82.37% [95% CI 80.56–84.18], AUC = 0.902 [95% CI 0.888–0.916]). Fused features with Swin V2 + LASSO yielded the best results (external accuracy = 94.6% [95% CI 93.5–95.7], F1 = 94.4% [95% CI 93.3–95.5], AUC = 97.2% [95% CI 96.4–98.0]), significantly surpassing single-modality models. SHAP analysis confirmed balanced contributions from deep, radiomic, and clinical features, while the nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.970 [95% CI 0.958–0.980] with excellent calibration. This framework demonstrates high accuracy, robustness, and interpretability in knee osteoarthritis severity grading from radiographs, offering strong potential for real-world clinical integration.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14027,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","volume":"36 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ima.70450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To develop and validate a multi-modal, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven framework for automated grading of knee osteoarthritis severity from radiographs, integrating advanced detection, deep learning, radiomics, and clinical data. A total of 2290 patients from five medical centers were included, split into an internal cohort (n = 1549) and an external test set (n = 741). Knee radiographs were preprocessed with histogram normalization, contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), and noise filtering. Four detection models, RT-DETR, SAM, DINOv2 + ViTDet, and Grounded-SAM/MedSAM, were evaluated for anatomical localization, with Grounded-SAM/MedSAM selected for optimal intersection over union (IoU) and mean average precision (mAP). Radiomic features (n = 215) were extracted from detected regions of interest (ROIs) using the Standardized Environment for Radiomics Analysis (SERA) platform, while deep features were derived from four advanced extractors, with MedSAM + feature aggregator selected for highest classification accuracy. Features underwent harmonization, variance filtering, and selection via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), principal component analysis (PCA), or mutual information. Clinical, radiomic, and deep features were fused and classified using CoAtNet, ConvNeXt V2, EfficientNetV2, RepLKNet, and Swin V2 Transformers. Model selection was performed within a nested cross-validation scheme on the internal cohort, and the external cohort was accessed only once after the final configuration had been fixed. Model performance was assessed by accuracy, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with interpretability provided by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and a nomogram. Grounded-SAM/MedSAM achieved the highest detection performance (external IoU = 90.83% [95% confidence interval, CI, 89.41–92.15], mAP = 93.67% [95% CI 92.38–94.82]). MedSAM deep features outperformed others (external F1 = 82.37% [95% CI 80.56–84.18], AUC = 0.902 [95% CI 0.888–0.916]). Fused features with Swin V2 + LASSO yielded the best results (external accuracy = 94.6% [95% CI 93.5–95.7], F1 = 94.4% [95% CI 93.3–95.5], AUC = 97.2% [95% CI 96.4–98.0]), significantly surpassing single-modality models. SHAP analysis confirmed balanced contributions from deep, radiomic, and clinical features, while the nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.970 [95% CI 0.958–0.980] with excellent calibration. This framework demonstrates high accuracy, robustness, and interpretability in knee osteoarthritis severity grading from radiographs, offering strong potential for real-world clinical integration.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology (IMA) is a forum for the exchange of ideas and results relevant to imaging systems, including imaging physics and informatics. The journal covers all imaging modalities in humans and animals.
IMA accepts technically sound and scientifically rigorous research in the interdisciplinary field of imaging, including relevant algorithmic research and hardware and software development, and their applications relevant to medical research. The journal provides a platform to publish original research in structural and functional imaging.
The journal is also open to imaging studies of the human body and on animals that describe novel diagnostic imaging and analyses methods. Technical, theoretical, and clinical research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Submissions describing methods, software, databases, replication studies as well as negative results are also considered.
The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to, the following in the context of biomedical research:
Imaging and neuro-imaging modalities: structural MRI, functional MRI, PET, SPECT, CT, ultrasound, EEG, MEG, NIRS etc.;
Neuromodulation and brain stimulation techniques such as TMS and tDCS;
Software and hardware for imaging, especially related to human and animal health;
Image segmentation in normal and clinical populations;
Pattern analysis and classification using machine learning techniques;
Computational modeling and analysis;
Brain connectivity and connectomics;
Systems-level characterization of brain function;
Neural networks and neurorobotics;
Computer vision, based on human/animal physiology;
Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology;
Big data, databasing and data mining.