Multi-Modal Transformer Framework for Automated Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading From Radiographs

IF 3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Qiang Yue, Qian Wang, Changshuang Bai, ZhaoXue Li, Li Zhao
{"title":"Multi-Modal Transformer Framework for Automated Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading From Radiographs","authors":"Qiang Yue,&nbsp;Qian Wang,&nbsp;Changshuang Bai,&nbsp;ZhaoXue Li,&nbsp;Li Zhao","doi":"10.1002/ima.70450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To develop and validate a multi-modal, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven framework for automated grading of knee osteoarthritis severity from radiographs, integrating advanced detection, deep learning, radiomics, and clinical data. A total of 2290 patients from five medical centers were included, split into an internal cohort (<i>n</i> = 1549) and an external test set (<i>n</i> = 741). Knee radiographs were preprocessed with histogram normalization, contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), and noise filtering. Four detection models, RT-DETR, SAM, DINOv2 + ViTDet, and Grounded-SAM/MedSAM, were evaluated for anatomical localization, with Grounded-SAM/MedSAM selected for optimal intersection over union (IoU) and mean average precision (mAP). Radiomic features (<i>n</i> = 215) were extracted from detected regions of interest (ROIs) using the Standardized Environment for Radiomics Analysis (SERA) platform, while deep features were derived from four advanced extractors, with MedSAM + feature aggregator selected for highest classification accuracy. Features underwent harmonization, variance filtering, and selection via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), principal component analysis (PCA), or mutual information. Clinical, radiomic, and deep features were fused and classified using CoAtNet, ConvNeXt V2, EfficientNetV2, RepLKNet, and Swin V2 Transformers. Model selection was performed within a nested cross-validation scheme on the internal cohort, and the external cohort was accessed only once after the final configuration had been fixed. Model performance was assessed by accuracy, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with interpretability provided by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and a nomogram. Grounded-SAM/MedSAM achieved the highest detection performance (external IoU = 90.83% [95% confidence interval, CI, 89.41–92.15], mAP = 93.67% [95% CI 92.38–94.82]). MedSAM deep features outperformed others (external F1 = 82.37% [95% CI 80.56–84.18], AUC = 0.902 [95% CI 0.888–0.916]). Fused features with Swin V2 + LASSO yielded the best results (external accuracy = 94.6% [95% CI 93.5–95.7], F1 = 94.4% [95% CI 93.3–95.5], AUC = 97.2% [95% CI 96.4–98.0]), significantly surpassing single-modality models. SHAP analysis confirmed balanced contributions from deep, radiomic, and clinical features, while the nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.970 [95% CI 0.958–0.980] with excellent calibration. This framework demonstrates high accuracy, robustness, and interpretability in knee osteoarthritis severity grading from radiographs, offering strong potential for real-world clinical integration.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14027,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","volume":"36 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ima.70450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To develop and validate a multi-modal, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven framework for automated grading of knee osteoarthritis severity from radiographs, integrating advanced detection, deep learning, radiomics, and clinical data. A total of 2290 patients from five medical centers were included, split into an internal cohort (n = 1549) and an external test set (n = 741). Knee radiographs were preprocessed with histogram normalization, contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), and noise filtering. Four detection models, RT-DETR, SAM, DINOv2 + ViTDet, and Grounded-SAM/MedSAM, were evaluated for anatomical localization, with Grounded-SAM/MedSAM selected for optimal intersection over union (IoU) and mean average precision (mAP). Radiomic features (n = 215) were extracted from detected regions of interest (ROIs) using the Standardized Environment for Radiomics Analysis (SERA) platform, while deep features were derived from four advanced extractors, with MedSAM + feature aggregator selected for highest classification accuracy. Features underwent harmonization, variance filtering, and selection via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), principal component analysis (PCA), or mutual information. Clinical, radiomic, and deep features were fused and classified using CoAtNet, ConvNeXt V2, EfficientNetV2, RepLKNet, and Swin V2 Transformers. Model selection was performed within a nested cross-validation scheme on the internal cohort, and the external cohort was accessed only once after the final configuration had been fixed. Model performance was assessed by accuracy, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with interpretability provided by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and a nomogram. Grounded-SAM/MedSAM achieved the highest detection performance (external IoU = 90.83% [95% confidence interval, CI, 89.41–92.15], mAP = 93.67% [95% CI 92.38–94.82]). MedSAM deep features outperformed others (external F1 = 82.37% [95% CI 80.56–84.18], AUC = 0.902 [95% CI 0.888–0.916]). Fused features with Swin V2 + LASSO yielded the best results (external accuracy = 94.6% [95% CI 93.5–95.7], F1 = 94.4% [95% CI 93.3–95.5], AUC = 97.2% [95% CI 96.4–98.0]), significantly surpassing single-modality models. SHAP analysis confirmed balanced contributions from deep, radiomic, and clinical features, while the nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.970 [95% CI 0.958–0.980] with excellent calibration. This framework demonstrates high accuracy, robustness, and interpretability in knee osteoarthritis severity grading from radiographs, offering strong potential for real-world clinical integration.

膝关节骨性关节炎x线片严重程度自动分级的多模态变压器框架
开发和验证一个多模式、人工智能(AI)驱动的框架,用于从x线片自动分级膝关节骨关节炎严重程度,整合先进的检测、深度学习、放射组学和临床数据。共纳入来自五个医疗中心的2290名患者,分为内部队列(n = 1549)和外部测试组(n = 741)。采用直方图归一化、对比度有限的自适应直方图均衡化(CLAHE)和噪声滤波对膝关节x线片进行预处理。对RT-DETR、SAM、DINOv2 + ViTDet和Grounded-SAM/MedSAM四种检测模型进行了解剖定位评估,并选择了ground -SAM/MedSAM的最佳交叉优于联合(IoU)和平均精度(mAP)。使用放射组学分析标准化环境(SERA)平台从检测到的感兴趣区域(roi)中提取放射组学特征(n = 215),而深度特征则来自四个先进的提取器,其中MedSAM +特征聚合器被选中以获得最高的分类精度。特征经过协调、方差过滤,并通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)、主成分分析(PCA)或互信息进行选择。使用CoAtNet、ConvNeXt V2、EfficientNetV2、RepLKNet和Swin V2变压器融合并分类临床、放射学和深部特征。模型选择是在内部队列的嵌套交叉验证方案中执行的,外部队列在最终配置确定后只访问一次。通过准确性、f1评分和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型性能,并通过SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析和nomogram提供可解释性。接地sam /MedSAM的检测性能最高(外部IoU = 90.83%[95%可信区间,CI, 89.41-92.15], mAP = 93.67% [95% CI, 92.38-94.82])。MedSAM深度特征优于其他特征(外部F1 = 82.37% [95% CI 80.56-84.18], AUC = 0.902 [95% CI 0.888-0.916])。Swin V2 + LASSO的融合特征获得了最好的结果(外部准确度= 94.6% [95% CI 93.5-95.7], F1 = 94.4% [95% CI 93.3-95.5], AUC = 97.2% [95% CI 96.4-98.0]),显著优于单模态模型。SHAP分析证实了深层、放射学和临床特征的平衡贡献,而nomogram C-index达到0.970 [95% CI 0.958-0.980],校准效果良好。该框架在膝关节骨性关节炎的x线片严重程度分级中显示出较高的准确性、稳健性和可解释性,为现实世界的临床整合提供了强大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology
International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 工程技术-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology (IMA) is a forum for the exchange of ideas and results relevant to imaging systems, including imaging physics and informatics. The journal covers all imaging modalities in humans and animals. IMA accepts technically sound and scientifically rigorous research in the interdisciplinary field of imaging, including relevant algorithmic research and hardware and software development, and their applications relevant to medical research. The journal provides a platform to publish original research in structural and functional imaging. The journal is also open to imaging studies of the human body and on animals that describe novel diagnostic imaging and analyses methods. Technical, theoretical, and clinical research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Submissions describing methods, software, databases, replication studies as well as negative results are also considered. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to, the following in the context of biomedical research: Imaging and neuro-imaging modalities: structural MRI, functional MRI, PET, SPECT, CT, ultrasound, EEG, MEG, NIRS etc.; Neuromodulation and brain stimulation techniques such as TMS and tDCS; Software and hardware for imaging, especially related to human and animal health; Image segmentation in normal and clinical populations; Pattern analysis and classification using machine learning techniques; Computational modeling and analysis; Brain connectivity and connectomics; Systems-level characterization of brain function; Neural networks and neurorobotics; Computer vision, based on human/animal physiology; Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology; Big data, databasing and data mining.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书