Biochar in Ecological Restoration of Degraded Lands, Soil Health, and Food Crops Safety

IF 2.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Prabhat Kumar Rai
{"title":"Biochar in Ecological Restoration of Degraded Lands, Soil Health, and Food Crops Safety","authors":"Prabhat Kumar Rai","doi":"10.1002/tqem.70468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Agro-chemicals intensive agriculture, coupled with biomass burning in ‘ethno-agricultural systems’ or shifting cultivated <i>Jhum</i> lands, stress the global agroecosystems with soil degradation and expanding marginal lands, causing food security and public health safety challenges. The pressing limitations of physico-chemical treatment methods, underscore the quest for designer or engineered biochar. However, abundantly generated agro-wastes utilization in ‘Agricultural-residues-derived-Biochar (ARBC)’ production are inadequately explored for eco-restoring soil health. Deploying ARBCs may offer land restoration by addressing heavy metals/metalloids pollution and revitalizing soil fertility. Present review, therefore envisions to fill the existing knowledge voids in ARBC-mediated ameliorations of soil quality, crops yield, and food safety, using standard methodologies. Results reveal that agro-waste biochar leverages soil restoration by modulating soil-physico-chemical characteristics, microbial enzymes, and oxidative stress tolerance mechanisms. Further, techno-economic advances in manoeuvring nano-biochar can augment the ARBC-efficiencies as ‘slow release nutrient fertilizers’, C-sequestration bioagent, metals bio-adsorbent, together resulting in ‘climate change-resilient-smart agriculture’. Moreover, ARBC-amended ‘agroecosystem engineering’ for land eco-restoration are aligned with the accomplishment of several ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ (SDGs). Nevertheless, existing limitations in terms of application protocols, optimizing biochar-dose, standardized feedstock selections, pollutant's release on biochar aging, together constraints long-term scalable ARBC-applications. In conclusion, targeted future researches, devising standardized methods to investigate the ‘Life Cycle Assessment’ and possible ecological risks of repeated long-term scalable biochar use can address these challenges. Prioritizing the field-scale studies on commercial ARBC-applications, in-tuned with techno-economic, scientific, nanotechnology, biotechnological, and risk-assessment advances can potentially restore the degraded lands to help achieve sustainability paradigm in agriculture systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":35327,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Quality Management","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.70468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agro-chemicals intensive agriculture, coupled with biomass burning in ‘ethno-agricultural systems’ or shifting cultivated Jhum lands, stress the global agroecosystems with soil degradation and expanding marginal lands, causing food security and public health safety challenges. The pressing limitations of physico-chemical treatment methods, underscore the quest for designer or engineered biochar. However, abundantly generated agro-wastes utilization in ‘Agricultural-residues-derived-Biochar (ARBC)’ production are inadequately explored for eco-restoring soil health. Deploying ARBCs may offer land restoration by addressing heavy metals/metalloids pollution and revitalizing soil fertility. Present review, therefore envisions to fill the existing knowledge voids in ARBC-mediated ameliorations of soil quality, crops yield, and food safety, using standard methodologies. Results reveal that agro-waste biochar leverages soil restoration by modulating soil-physico-chemical characteristics, microbial enzymes, and oxidative stress tolerance mechanisms. Further, techno-economic advances in manoeuvring nano-biochar can augment the ARBC-efficiencies as ‘slow release nutrient fertilizers’, C-sequestration bioagent, metals bio-adsorbent, together resulting in ‘climate change-resilient-smart agriculture’. Moreover, ARBC-amended ‘agroecosystem engineering’ for land eco-restoration are aligned with the accomplishment of several ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ (SDGs). Nevertheless, existing limitations in terms of application protocols, optimizing biochar-dose, standardized feedstock selections, pollutant's release on biochar aging, together constraints long-term scalable ARBC-applications. In conclusion, targeted future researches, devising standardized methods to investigate the ‘Life Cycle Assessment’ and possible ecological risks of repeated long-term scalable biochar use can address these challenges. Prioritizing the field-scale studies on commercial ARBC-applications, in-tuned with techno-economic, scientific, nanotechnology, biotechnological, and risk-assessment advances can potentially restore the degraded lands to help achieve sustainability paradigm in agriculture systems.

生物炭在退化土地生态恢复、土壤健康和粮食作物安全中的应用
农用化学品密集型农业,加上“民族农业系统”中的生物质燃烧或Jhum耕地的转移,使全球农业生态系统面临土壤退化和边际土地扩大的压力,造成粮食安全和公共卫生安全挑战。物理化学处理方法的紧迫局限性,强调了对设计或工程生物炭的追求。然而,大量产生的农业废弃物在“农业残渣衍生生物炭(ARBC)”生产中的利用在生态恢复土壤健康方面尚未得到充分的探索。部署arbc可以通过解决重金属/类金属污染和恢复土壤肥力来实现土地恢复。因此,本综述设想利用标准方法,填补arbc介导的土壤质量、作物产量和食品安全改善方面的现有知识空白。结果表明,农业废弃物生物炭通过调节土壤理化特性、微生物酶和氧化胁迫耐受机制来调节土壤修复。此外,操纵纳米生物炭的技术经济进步可以提高arbc的效率,作为“缓释养分肥料”、碳固存生物剂、金属生物吸附剂,共同产生“适应气候变化的智能农业”。此外,经arbc修订的用于土地生态恢复的“农业生态系统工程”与实现若干“可持续发展目标”(sdg)相一致。然而,在应用方案、优化生物炭剂量、标准化原料选择、生物炭老化过程中污染物释放等方面的现有限制,共同限制了arbc的长期可扩展应用。总之,有针对性的未来研究,设计标准化的方法来调查“生命周期评估”和长期重复可扩展的生物炭使用可能带来的生态风险,可以解决这些挑战。优先开展arbc商业应用的实地研究,配合技术经济、科学、纳米技术、生物技术和风险评估的进展,有可能恢复退化的土地,帮助实现农业系统的可持续性范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Quality Management
Environmental Quality Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Four times a year, this practical journal shows you how to improve environmental performance and exceed voluntary standards such as ISO 14000. In each issue, you"ll find in-depth articles and the most current case studies of successful environmental quality improvement efforts -- and guidance on how you can apply these goals to your organization. Written by leading industry experts and practitioners, Environmental Quality Management brings you innovative practices in Performance Measurement...Life-Cycle Assessments...Safety Management... Environmental Auditing...ISO 14000 Standards and Certification..."Green Accounting"...Environmental Communication...Sustainable Development Issues...Environmental Benchmarking...Global Environmental Law and Regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书