Perceived Equity: An Underlying Mechanism Between Sustainability Strategies Adopted by Businesses and Farmers' Well-Being in Agri-Food Value Chains

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS
Javier G. Montoya-Zumaeta, Samuel Bruelisauer, Christoph Oberlack
{"title":"Perceived Equity: An Underlying Mechanism Between Sustainability Strategies Adopted by Businesses and Farmers' Well-Being in Agri-Food Value Chains","authors":"Javier G. Montoya-Zumaeta,&nbsp;Samuel Bruelisauer,&nbsp;Christoph Oberlack","doi":"10.1002/bsd2.70430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To promote the well-being of farmers, businesses across coffee, cocoa, and other agri-food value chains are increasingly adopting sustainability strategies that go beyond classical certification schemes. Key strategies include corporate sustainability programs, social entrepreneurship, and farmer self-organization in cooperatives. However, the links between these strategies and farmer well-being vary considerably—and the mechanisms explaining these variations remain insufficiently understood, especially those operating in upstream links of agri-food chains. This paper investigates how perceived equity in farmer–buyer first-mile relationships and farmers' access to extension services differ across sustainability strategies, and to what extent these mechanisms explain well-being differences across Peruvian coffee and cocoa farmers. We rely on descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses performed on a cross-sectional dataset that compiles information on 623 farmers across three production areas. Our results demonstrate that equity as perceived by farmers from their first-mile relationships plays a greater role in explaining well-being differences than access to extension services. These well-being connections vary across demographic groups, decreasing significantly for older and female farmer groups. Furthermore, farmers engaged in social enterprises are more likely to report higher levels of perceived equity compared to those affiliated with corporate sustainability programs or cooperatives. Despite the correlational design of this analysis, its results unveil important implications for business practices: while extension services are relatively standard across all examined strategies, practices aimed at strengthening perceived equity are currently not. Discussing these findings, we examine the challenges of scaling up perceived equity through social enterprises.</p>","PeriodicalId":36531,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and Development","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bsd2.70430","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsd2.70430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To promote the well-being of farmers, businesses across coffee, cocoa, and other agri-food value chains are increasingly adopting sustainability strategies that go beyond classical certification schemes. Key strategies include corporate sustainability programs, social entrepreneurship, and farmer self-organization in cooperatives. However, the links between these strategies and farmer well-being vary considerably—and the mechanisms explaining these variations remain insufficiently understood, especially those operating in upstream links of agri-food chains. This paper investigates how perceived equity in farmer–buyer first-mile relationships and farmers' access to extension services differ across sustainability strategies, and to what extent these mechanisms explain well-being differences across Peruvian coffee and cocoa farmers. We rely on descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses performed on a cross-sectional dataset that compiles information on 623 farmers across three production areas. Our results demonstrate that equity as perceived by farmers from their first-mile relationships plays a greater role in explaining well-being differences than access to extension services. These well-being connections vary across demographic groups, decreasing significantly for older and female farmer groups. Furthermore, farmers engaged in social enterprises are more likely to report higher levels of perceived equity compared to those affiliated with corporate sustainability programs or cooperatives. Despite the correlational design of this analysis, its results unveil important implications for business practices: while extension services are relatively standard across all examined strategies, practices aimed at strengthening perceived equity are currently not. Discussing these findings, we examine the challenges of scaling up perceived equity through social enterprises.

感知公平:农业食品价值链中企业可持续发展战略与农民福祉之间的潜在机制
为了促进农民的福祉,咖啡、可可和其他农业食品价值链上的企业越来越多地采用超越传统认证计划的可持续发展战略。主要战略包括企业可持续发展项目、社会企业家精神和农民合作社自组织。然而,这些策略与农民福利之间的联系差异很大,而解释这些差异的机制仍然没有得到充分的了解,特别是那些在农业食物链上游环节运作的机制。本文调查了农民-买方第一英里关系中的感知公平和农民获得推广服务的机会在可持续性战略中的差异,以及这些机制在多大程度上解释了秘鲁咖啡和可可农民的福祉差异。我们依靠对横截面数据集进行的描述性和多元统计分析,该数据集汇编了三个生产区623名农民的信息。我们的研究结果表明,与获得推广服务相比,农民从第一英里关系中感知到的公平在解释福祉差异方面发挥了更大的作用。这些幸福感联系在不同的人口群体中有所不同,在老年和女性农民群体中显著下降。此外,与那些参与企业可持续发展项目或合作社的农民相比,参与社会企业的农民更有可能报告更高水平的感知公平。尽管这一分析的相关设计,其结果揭示了对商业实践的重要影响:虽然推广服务在所有审查的战略中都是相对标准的,但旨在加强感知公平的做法目前还不是。讨论这些发现,我们研究了通过社会企业扩大感知公平的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Business Strategy and Development
Business Strategy and Development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书