Natural history of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion in males: Experience from two tertiary centres in the United Kingdom

IF 2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2026-10-09 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70277
Loufopoulos Ioannis, Pace Keith, Toia Bogdan, Kapriniotis Konstantinos, Papaefstathiou Efstathios, Newman Thomas, Barratt Rachel, Nobrega Richard, Noah Anthony, Gresty Helena, Sharma Davendra, Greenwell Tamsin, Seth Jai, Ockrim Jeremy
{"title":"Natural history of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion in males: Experience from two tertiary centres in the United Kingdom","authors":"Loufopoulos Ioannis,&nbsp;Pace Keith,&nbsp;Toia Bogdan,&nbsp;Kapriniotis Konstantinos,&nbsp;Papaefstathiou Efstathios,&nbsp;Newman Thomas,&nbsp;Barratt Rachel,&nbsp;Nobrega Richard,&nbsp;Noah Anthony,&nbsp;Gresty Helena,&nbsp;Sharma Davendra,&nbsp;Greenwell Tamsin,&nbsp;Seth Jai,&nbsp;Ockrim Jeremy","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to describe the natural history of urethral cuff erosion (UCE) following artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation, including the incidence of urethral stricture and fistula formation, and the outcomes of salvage AUS reimplantation, based on the experience of two UK tertiary centres.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data collected prospectively from 2016 to 2024 was analysed retrospectively. Demographics, characteristics and outcomes of AUS re-implantation were analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 273 AUS implantation were performed during the study period. Fifty had device explantation for UCE. Median age at explantation was 73 years. Median time from implantation to erosion was 32 months. About 12% had a history of neurogenic bladder and 58% pelvic irradiation. The most significant cause of acute erosion was traumatic catheterisation (44%).</p>\n \n <p>Following explantation, nine developed urethral stricture (18%), while five patients had urethro-cutaneous fistulae (10%). Twelve individuals underwent salvage AUS re-implantation with 6 (50%) requiring further explantation (50%) within 8 months. Of the remaining 38 patients, 17 continued with pad use alone and 21 underwent alternative conservative management including long-term catheterisation, convene drainage, penile clamp or urethral bulking. Four patients (8%) ultimately required urinary diversion, two following primary explantation and two following failed salvage reimplantation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 18% of males having AUS implantation had UCE and explantation of the device. The vast majority of them had a history of pelvic irradiation or catheterisation for stricture disease (76%). The main risk for UCE was traumatic catheterisation. About 18% of explanted cases developed urethral stricture and 10% urethra-cutaneous fistulae. Only 24% of these patients had attempted salvage AUS re-implantation, with one half resulting in further early UCE/infection and removal.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"7 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70277","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to describe the natural history of urethral cuff erosion (UCE) following artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation, including the incidence of urethral stricture and fistula formation, and the outcomes of salvage AUS reimplantation, based on the experience of two UK tertiary centres.

Material and methods

Data collected prospectively from 2016 to 2024 was analysed retrospectively. Demographics, characteristics and outcomes of AUS re-implantation were analysed.

Results

A total of 273 AUS implantation were performed during the study period. Fifty had device explantation for UCE. Median age at explantation was 73 years. Median time from implantation to erosion was 32 months. About 12% had a history of neurogenic bladder and 58% pelvic irradiation. The most significant cause of acute erosion was traumatic catheterisation (44%).

Following explantation, nine developed urethral stricture (18%), while five patients had urethro-cutaneous fistulae (10%). Twelve individuals underwent salvage AUS re-implantation with 6 (50%) requiring further explantation (50%) within 8 months. Of the remaining 38 patients, 17 continued with pad use alone and 21 underwent alternative conservative management including long-term catheterisation, convene drainage, penile clamp or urethral bulking. Four patients (8%) ultimately required urinary diversion, two following primary explantation and two following failed salvage reimplantation.

Conclusion

Overall, 18% of males having AUS implantation had UCE and explantation of the device. The vast majority of them had a history of pelvic irradiation or catheterisation for stricture disease (76%). The main risk for UCE was traumatic catheterisation. About 18% of explanted cases developed urethral stricture and 10% urethra-cutaneous fistulae. Only 24% of these patients had attempted salvage AUS re-implantation, with one half resulting in further early UCE/infection and removal.

男性人工尿括约肌套糜烂的自然史:来自英国两个三级中心的经验
目的本研究旨在描述人工尿道括约肌(AUS)植入术后尿道袖带糜烂(UCE)的自然历史,包括尿道狭窄和瘘管形成的发生率,以及再植人工尿道括约肌(AUS)的结果。材料与方法对2016 - 2024年前瞻性收集的资料进行回顾性分析。分析AUS再植入术的人口学特征、特点及结果。结果研究期间共行AUS植入273例。其中50例为UCE手术。移植的中位年龄为73岁。从种植到糜烂的中位时间为32个月。约12%有神经源性膀胱病史,58%有盆腔放疗史。急性糜烂最重要的原因是外伤性置管(44%)。术后9例出现尿道狭窄(18%),5例出现尿道-皮肤瘘(10%)。12例患者接受了补救性AUS再植入术,其中6例(50%)在8个月内需要进一步植入术。在其余38例患者中,17例继续单独使用尿垫,21例接受替代保守治疗,包括长期导尿、引流、阴茎夹紧或尿道膨胀。4例(8%)患者最终需要尿转移,2例在初次植入术后,2例在再植失败后。结论总体而言,18%的男性植入术患者有UCE和植入术。绝大多数患者(76%)曾因狭窄疾病接受盆腔照射或置管治疗。UCE的主要风险是外伤性导尿。约18%的移植病例出现尿道狭窄,10%出现尿道皮瘘。这些患者中只有24%尝试挽救性AUS再植入术,其中一半导致进一步早期UCE/感染和切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书