Socioeconomic Status and Fine-Grained Literacy Outcomes in Heritage Bilingual and Monolingual Children With and Without Specific Learning Disorders

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Dyslexia Pub Date : 2026-10-09 DOI:10.1002/dys.70051
Paola Bonifacci, Elisabetta Lombardo, Marina Porrelli, Alessia Rapino, Anna Gallani, Carlotta Facini, Chiara Gelmini, Chiara Nanni, Michela Muccinelli, Elena Mannino, Simona Chiodo
{"title":"Socioeconomic Status and Fine-Grained Literacy Outcomes in Heritage Bilingual and Monolingual Children With and Without Specific Learning Disorders","authors":"Paola Bonifacci,&nbsp;Elisabetta Lombardo,&nbsp;Marina Porrelli,&nbsp;Alessia Rapino,&nbsp;Anna Gallani,&nbsp;Carlotta Facini,&nbsp;Chiara Gelmini,&nbsp;Chiara Nanni,&nbsp;Michela Muccinelli,&nbsp;Elena Mannino,&nbsp;Simona Chiodo","doi":"10.1002/dys.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the sociolinguistic background and the cognitive and literacy profiles of heritage bilingual (HB) children with specific learning disorders (SLD) in reading and spelling or typical development (TD) in comparison with their monolingual peers. About 454 primary school children were included and divided into four groups: HBs with SLD (<i>n</i> = 108) or TD (<i>n</i> = 70), and monolinguals with SLD (<i>n</i> = 106) or TD (<i>n</i> = 170). Children completed tasks assessing nonverbal IQ, working memory, processing speed, nonword repetition, listening comprehension, and literacy skills, including word, nonword, and text reading and spelling, and reading comprehension. Parents provided information on language history and socioeconomic status (SES). Results showed comparable sociolinguistic profiles across groups, with greater heritage language maintenance in the HB-TD group. SES primarily predicted performance on tasks with higher lexical demands and nonverbal IQ. Once SES was considered, language background only influenced spelling tasks. Interaction effects indicated a stronger influence of SES in HBs. At the phenotypic level, HBs and monolingual children with SLD showed comparable profiles, with an SLD-specific disadvantage for HBs emerging only in nonword spelling. These findings underscore the importance of SES in assessing HB children and promoting the home language in clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.70051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.70051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the sociolinguistic background and the cognitive and literacy profiles of heritage bilingual (HB) children with specific learning disorders (SLD) in reading and spelling or typical development (TD) in comparison with their monolingual peers. About 454 primary school children were included and divided into four groups: HBs with SLD (n = 108) or TD (n = 70), and monolinguals with SLD (n = 106) or TD (n = 170). Children completed tasks assessing nonverbal IQ, working memory, processing speed, nonword repetition, listening comprehension, and literacy skills, including word, nonword, and text reading and spelling, and reading comprehension. Parents provided information on language history and socioeconomic status (SES). Results showed comparable sociolinguistic profiles across groups, with greater heritage language maintenance in the HB-TD group. SES primarily predicted performance on tasks with higher lexical demands and nonverbal IQ. Once SES was considered, language background only influenced spelling tasks. Interaction effects indicated a stronger influence of SES in HBs. At the phenotypic level, HBs and monolingual children with SLD showed comparable profiles, with an SLD-specific disadvantage for HBs emerging only in nonword spelling. These findings underscore the importance of SES in assessing HB children and promoting the home language in clinical populations.

有和没有特殊学习障碍的传统双语和单语儿童的社会经济地位和细粒度读写结果
本研究调查了传统双语儿童在阅读和拼写方面的特殊学习障碍(SLD)和典型发展(TD)与单语儿童的社会语言学背景、认知和扫盲特征。共纳入454名小学生,并将其分为四组:患有特殊语言障碍的HBs儿童(n = 108)和患有特殊语言障碍的单语儿童(n = 106)和患有特殊语言障碍的单语儿童(n = 170)。孩子们完成了评估非语言智商、工作记忆、处理速度、非单词重复、听力理解和读写技能的任务,包括单词、非单词、文本阅读和拼写,以及阅读理解。家长提供了语言历史和社会经济地位(SES)的信息。结果显示,不同群体的社会语言学特征相似,HB-TD群体的传统语言维护程度更高。社会经济地位主要预测高词汇要求和非语言智商任务的表现。一旦考虑到SES,语言背景只影响拼写任务。交互效应表明SES对HBs的影响更大。在表型水平上,高智商儿童和单语儿童的特殊语言障碍表现出相似的特征,高智商儿童仅在非单词拼写方面表现出特殊语言障碍特有的劣势。这些发现强调了SES在评估HB儿童和在临床人群中促进家庭语言的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dyslexia
Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: DYSLEXIA provides reviews and reports of research, assessment and intervention practice. In many fields of enquiry theoretical advances often occur in response to practical needs; and a central aim of the journal is to bring together researchers and practitioners in the field of dyslexia, so that each can learn from the other. Interesting developments, both theoretical and practical, are being reported in many different countries: DYSLEXIA is a forum in which a knowledge of these developments can be shared by readers in all parts of the world. The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education Therapy and Counselling Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of: - Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology - Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education - Therapy and Counselling - Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书