Unmasking Hidden Seed Resistance to Storage Pests: Testing Antibiosis and Antixenosis

IF 2.5
Sonja Gvozdenac, Aleksandra Ilić, Ivana Štajner Papuga, Julia Mikaela Parsons, Jordi Riudavets, Milica Škorić
{"title":"Unmasking Hidden Seed Resistance to Storage Pests: Testing Antibiosis and Antixenosis","authors":"Sonja Gvozdenac,&nbsp;Aleksandra Ilić,&nbsp;Ivana Štajner Papuga,&nbsp;Julia Mikaela Parsons,&nbsp;Jordi Riudavets,&nbsp;Milica Škorić","doi":"10.1002/cpz1.70465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Postharvest seed losses caused by stored-product insect pests can reach 90%, depending on the commodity, country, and storage technology, resulting in considerable economic losses and threats to food safety and security. Breeding genotypes (varieties, hybrids, landraces, inbred lines, etc.) resistant to insect pests is among the most effective pest management methods, although it has not yet been explored in detail or used to control stored-product pests. To help breeders develop resistant genotypes, it is a prerequisite to identify inherently resistant lines, identify seed defense traits, and define the underlying genetic basis of resistance. Resistance mechanisms include: i) antibiosis (assessed in “no-choice” tests), indicating seed suitability for insect development (measured as progeny production and % of consumed seed), and ii) antixenosis (assessed in “choice” olfactometric tests), analyzing specific genotypic attractiveness (i.e., insect preference) based on insects’ behavioral responses to different olfactory stimuli. There is an obvious lack of a joint protocol that integrates antibiosis and antixenosis test results and provides detailed information about the impact of unsuitable seed traits on insect pest bionomy. Moreover, no protocol exists for testing antixenosis across a large number of genotypes using olfactometric devices. The novelty of this work lies in: (i) the development of a choice test protocol for the assessment of seed attractiveness and insect preference across a large set of genotypes simultaneously; (ii) the integration of the results with those from no-choice tests; and (iii) a specifically designed mathematical model that indicates the level of susceptibility of each genotype. These tests were developed, optimized, and performed on two major crop groups—cereals and legumes—to assess their resistance to the main stored-product (seed) pests: the rice weevil, the bean beetle, and the lesser grain borer. © 2026 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</p><p><b>Basic Protocol 1</b>: Antibiosis (no-choice) test</p><p><b>Basic Protocol 2</b>: Antixenosis (choice) test</p><p><b>Basic Protocol 3</b>: Choquet-based Attractiveness Ranking Protocol – CHARP</p>","PeriodicalId":93970,"journal":{"name":"Current protocols","volume":"6 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpz1.70465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postharvest seed losses caused by stored-product insect pests can reach 90%, depending on the commodity, country, and storage technology, resulting in considerable economic losses and threats to food safety and security. Breeding genotypes (varieties, hybrids, landraces, inbred lines, etc.) resistant to insect pests is among the most effective pest management methods, although it has not yet been explored in detail or used to control stored-product pests. To help breeders develop resistant genotypes, it is a prerequisite to identify inherently resistant lines, identify seed defense traits, and define the underlying genetic basis of resistance. Resistance mechanisms include: i) antibiosis (assessed in “no-choice” tests), indicating seed suitability for insect development (measured as progeny production and % of consumed seed), and ii) antixenosis (assessed in “choice” olfactometric tests), analyzing specific genotypic attractiveness (i.e., insect preference) based on insects’ behavioral responses to different olfactory stimuli. There is an obvious lack of a joint protocol that integrates antibiosis and antixenosis test results and provides detailed information about the impact of unsuitable seed traits on insect pest bionomy. Moreover, no protocol exists for testing antixenosis across a large number of genotypes using olfactometric devices. The novelty of this work lies in: (i) the development of a choice test protocol for the assessment of seed attractiveness and insect preference across a large set of genotypes simultaneously; (ii) the integration of the results with those from no-choice tests; and (iii) a specifically designed mathematical model that indicates the level of susceptibility of each genotype. These tests were developed, optimized, and performed on two major crop groups—cereals and legumes—to assess their resistance to the main stored-product (seed) pests: the rice weevil, the bean beetle, and the lesser grain borer. © 2026 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Basic Protocol 1: Antibiosis (no-choice) test

Basic Protocol 2: Antixenosis (choice) test

Basic Protocol 3: Choquet-based Attractiveness Ranking Protocol – CHARP

揭秘种子对贮藏害虫的抗性:抗生素和抗虫性测试
根据商品、国家和储存技术的不同,储粮害虫造成的采后种子损失可达90%,造成相当大的经济损失,并对食品安全构成威胁。培育抗虫害的基因型(品种、杂交种、地方品种、自交系等)是最有效的害虫管理方法之一,尽管它尚未被详细探索或用于控制储存产品害虫。为了帮助育种者开发抗性基因型,鉴定固有抗性品系、鉴定种子防御性状和确定抗性的潜在遗传基础是一个先决条件。抗性机制包括:1)抗菌性(在“无选择”试验中评估),表明种子适合昆虫发育(以后代产量和消耗种子的百分比衡量);2)抗虫性(在“选择”嗅觉试验中评估),根据昆虫对不同嗅觉刺激的行为反应分析特定的基因型吸引力(即昆虫偏好)。目前明显缺乏一个联合方案,将抗生素和抗虫病试验结果整合起来,并提供有关不适宜种子性状对害虫生物学影响的详细信息。此外,目前还没有使用嗅觉测量设备在大量基因型中检测抗xenosis的方案。这项工作的新颖性在于:(i)开发了一种选择测试方案,用于同时评估大量基因型的种子吸引力和昆虫偏好;(ii)将测试结果与非选择测试结果相结合;(iii)一个专门设计的数学模型,表明每个基因型的易感性水平。这些试验是在谷物和豆类两大类作物上开发、优化并实施的,以评估它们对主要储藏产品(种子)害虫(稻象甲、豆甲虫和较小的谷物螟虫)的抗性。©2026 Wiley Periodicals llc .基本协议1:抗生素(无选择);基本协议2:抗xenosis(可选择);基本协议3:基于choquet的吸引力排名协议- CHARP
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书