J. K. Ando, A. J. Blance, É. Brassard, A. Gmerek, R. Platt, L. Galien, Z. A. Guess, A. V. Jasko, M. Simopolou, K. Tunnell, D. A. Kring
{"title":"Ancient Impact Melt Near the Lunar South Pole: Distribution, Provenance, and Sampling Strategy","authors":"J. K. Ando, A. J. Blance, É. Brassard, A. Gmerek, R. Platt, L. Galien, Z. A. Guess, A. V. Jasko, M. Simopolou, K. Tunnell, D. A. Kring","doi":"10.1029/2026JE009990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to a lack of pre-Nectarian samples associated with specific impacts in the Apollo suite, the early Solar System's impact chronology is poorly constrained. We investigate where Artemis and other south polar lunar missions could sample impactites to determine the ages of pre-Nectarian craters, focusing on the ancient craters Haworth, Shoemaker, and Faustini. We examine similarly sized non-polar analogue craters containing mappable impact melt features and find no patterns that could be used to predict where similar deposits may have once existed in the south polar region. We also create a model of the ejecta stratigraphy of craters that post-date the South Pole-Aitken basin, from which we predict how younger, smaller craters may excavate ancient, buried impact melt to the surface. We find that, at most, primary impact melt from a source crater will comprise no more than 2%–3% of material at the surface above its buried rim, and <1% elsewhere. Furthermore, disruption of the ejecta stratigraphy by ballistic sedimentation and surface mixing due to impact gardening will make sampling specific sources more difficult. We conclude that determining the provenance of ancient impact melt samples will be difficult, but that sampling near the rim of a given source—such as in the “Haworth” Artemis candidate landing region—will maximize the chances of success.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"131 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2026JE009990","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026JE009990","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to a lack of pre-Nectarian samples associated with specific impacts in the Apollo suite, the early Solar System's impact chronology is poorly constrained. We investigate where Artemis and other south polar lunar missions could sample impactites to determine the ages of pre-Nectarian craters, focusing on the ancient craters Haworth, Shoemaker, and Faustini. We examine similarly sized non-polar analogue craters containing mappable impact melt features and find no patterns that could be used to predict where similar deposits may have once existed in the south polar region. We also create a model of the ejecta stratigraphy of craters that post-date the South Pole-Aitken basin, from which we predict how younger, smaller craters may excavate ancient, buried impact melt to the surface. We find that, at most, primary impact melt from a source crater will comprise no more than 2%–3% of material at the surface above its buried rim, and <1% elsewhere. Furthermore, disruption of the ejecta stratigraphy by ballistic sedimentation and surface mixing due to impact gardening will make sampling specific sources more difficult. We conclude that determining the provenance of ancient impact melt samples will be difficult, but that sampling near the rim of a given source—such as in the “Haworth” Artemis candidate landing region—will maximize the chances of success.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.