Ancient Impact Melt Near the Lunar South Pole: Distribution, Provenance, and Sampling Strategy

IF 3.7 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
J. K. Ando, A. J. Blance, É. Brassard, A. Gmerek, R. Platt, L. Galien, Z. A. Guess, A. V. Jasko, M. Simopolou, K. Tunnell, D. A. Kring
{"title":"Ancient Impact Melt Near the Lunar South Pole: Distribution, Provenance, and Sampling Strategy","authors":"J. K. Ando,&nbsp;A. J. Blance,&nbsp;É. Brassard,&nbsp;A. Gmerek,&nbsp;R. Platt,&nbsp;L. Galien,&nbsp;Z. A. Guess,&nbsp;A. V. Jasko,&nbsp;M. Simopolou,&nbsp;K. Tunnell,&nbsp;D. A. Kring","doi":"10.1029/2026JE009990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to a lack of pre-Nectarian samples associated with specific impacts in the Apollo suite, the early Solar System's impact chronology is poorly constrained. We investigate where Artemis and other south polar lunar missions could sample impactites to determine the ages of pre-Nectarian craters, focusing on the ancient craters Haworth, Shoemaker, and Faustini. We examine similarly sized non-polar analogue craters containing mappable impact melt features and find no patterns that could be used to predict where similar deposits may have once existed in the south polar region. We also create a model of the ejecta stratigraphy of craters that post-date the South Pole-Aitken basin, from which we predict how younger, smaller craters may excavate ancient, buried impact melt to the surface. We find that, at most, primary impact melt from a source crater will comprise no more than 2%–3% of material at the surface above its buried rim, and &lt;1% elsewhere. Furthermore, disruption of the ejecta stratigraphy by ballistic sedimentation and surface mixing due to impact gardening will make sampling specific sources more difficult. We conclude that determining the provenance of ancient impact melt samples will be difficult, but that sampling near the rim of a given source—such as in the “Haworth” Artemis candidate landing region—will maximize the chances of success.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"131 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2026JE009990","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026JE009990","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to a lack of pre-Nectarian samples associated with specific impacts in the Apollo suite, the early Solar System's impact chronology is poorly constrained. We investigate where Artemis and other south polar lunar missions could sample impactites to determine the ages of pre-Nectarian craters, focusing on the ancient craters Haworth, Shoemaker, and Faustini. We examine similarly sized non-polar analogue craters containing mappable impact melt features and find no patterns that could be used to predict where similar deposits may have once existed in the south polar region. We also create a model of the ejecta stratigraphy of craters that post-date the South Pole-Aitken basin, from which we predict how younger, smaller craters may excavate ancient, buried impact melt to the surface. We find that, at most, primary impact melt from a source crater will comprise no more than 2%–3% of material at the surface above its buried rim, and <1% elsewhere. Furthermore, disruption of the ejecta stratigraphy by ballistic sedimentation and surface mixing due to impact gardening will make sampling specific sources more difficult. We conclude that determining the provenance of ancient impact melt samples will be difficult, but that sampling near the rim of a given source—such as in the “Haworth” Artemis candidate landing region—will maximize the chances of success.

月球南极附近的古代撞击融化:分布、来源和取样策略
由于缺乏与阿波罗套件中特定撞击相关的前nectarian样本,早期太阳系的撞击年表受到了很好的约束。我们调查了阿尔忒弥斯和其他南极月球任务可以在哪里取样撞击,以确定前nectarian陨石坑的年龄,重点关注古老的陨石坑Haworth, Shoemaker和Faustini。我们研究了类似大小的非极性模拟陨石坑,其中包含可测绘的撞击熔体特征,并没有发现可用于预测南极地区可能曾经存在类似沉积物的模式。我们还创建了一个陨石坑的喷出物地层学模型,该模型可以追溯到南极-艾特肯盆地,从中我们预测更年轻,更小的陨石坑如何将古老的,埋藏的撞击融化物挖掘到地表。我们发现,源陨石坑的初次撞击熔体最多只占其埋藏边缘以上表面物质的2%-3%,占其他地方物质的1%。此外,由于冲击造园而造成的弹道沉积和地表混合对喷出物地层的破坏将使对特定来源的采样变得更加困难。我们得出的结论是,确定古代撞击熔体样本的来源将是困难的,但在给定来源的边缘附近采样-例如在“霍沃斯”阿尔忒弥斯候选着陆区域-将最大限度地提高成功的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书