Perspectives on Person-Centred End-of-Life Care in Care Homes: Findings From a Qualitative Secondary Analysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gary Hodge, Susie Pearce
{"title":"Perspectives on Person-Centred End-of-Life Care in Care Homes: Findings From a Qualitative Secondary Analysis","authors":"Gary Hodge,&nbsp;Susie Pearce","doi":"10.1155/hsc/6664193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The number of older people dying in long-term care facilities (LTCF) is growing globally. This highlights an urgent need for high-quality and person-centred palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) to be incorporated in LTCFs’, such as care homes. Resident health and care complexities can lead to challenges around PEoLC decision-making and delays in pre-death discussions, ultimately impacting on a care home’s ability to provide a ‘good death’ for the resident and those caring for them.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to explore what good person-centred end-of-life care might look like in a care home from the perspective of residents, family members and health and care professionals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative secondary analysis (QSA) of multistakeholder interview data collected from a multiple case study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-one interviews were undertaken across seven care homes. Participants included care home residents, family members and health and care professionals. The data of these interviews were reanalysed by posing new questions; what might good person-centred end-of-life care (a ‘good death’) look like in a care home, and what factors influence its delivery? Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis (RTA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three themes were generated from this QSA: Getting it right for the resident: ‘we only get one shot at it’; Supporting family members: ‘there till the end together’; and Caring for the care professionals: ‘I hate that part of my job’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Good person-centred end-of-life care not only ‘gets it right’ for the resident by personalising moments spent with them during their last days and hours of life, but it also cares for their family and the care professionals delivering care. A people-centred approach to end-of-life care can guide future research and practice towards more responsive, setting-specific approaches that support a ‘good death’ in care homes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/6664193","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/6664193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The number of older people dying in long-term care facilities (LTCF) is growing globally. This highlights an urgent need for high-quality and person-centred palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) to be incorporated in LTCFs’, such as care homes. Resident health and care complexities can lead to challenges around PEoLC decision-making and delays in pre-death discussions, ultimately impacting on a care home’s ability to provide a ‘good death’ for the resident and those caring for them.

Aim

We aimed to explore what good person-centred end-of-life care might look like in a care home from the perspective of residents, family members and health and care professionals.

Design

A qualitative secondary analysis (QSA) of multistakeholder interview data collected from a multiple case study.

Methods

Sixty-one interviews were undertaken across seven care homes. Participants included care home residents, family members and health and care professionals. The data of these interviews were reanalysed by posing new questions; what might good person-centred end-of-life care (a ‘good death’) look like in a care home, and what factors influence its delivery? Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis (RTA).

Results

Three themes were generated from this QSA: Getting it right for the resident: ‘we only get one shot at it’; Supporting family members: ‘there till the end together’; and Caring for the care professionals: ‘I hate that part of my job’.

Conclusion

Good person-centred end-of-life care not only ‘gets it right’ for the resident by personalising moments spent with them during their last days and hours of life, but it also cares for their family and the care professionals delivering care. A people-centred approach to end-of-life care can guide future research and practice towards more responsive, setting-specific approaches that support a ‘good death’ in care homes.

以人为中心的临终关怀在护理院的观点:从定性的二次分析结果
在全球范围内,死于长期护理机构(LTCF)的老年人数量正在增长。这突出表明迫切需要将高质量和以人为本的姑息治疗和临终关怀(PEoLC)纳入长期护理中心,例如养老院。居民健康和护理的复杂性可能导致PEoLC决策方面的挑战和死亡前讨论的延误,最终影响养老院为居民和照顾他们的人提供“良好死亡”的能力。目的:我们的目的是探索从居民、家庭成员和健康护理专业人员的角度来看,养老院中以人为本的临终关怀是什么样子的。设计从多个案例研究中收集的多利益相关者访谈数据的定性二次分析(QSA)。方法在7家养老院进行61次访谈。参与者包括护理院居民、家庭成员以及健康和护理专业人员。通过提出新问题来重新分析这些访谈的数据;在护理院,以人为本的临终关怀(“善终”)会是什么样子?哪些因素会影响其提供?数据分析采用反身性主题分析(RTA)。结果从QSA中产生了三个主题:对居民来说是正确的:“我们只有一次机会”;支持家庭成员:“一起到最后”;照顾专业护理人员:“我讨厌我工作的这一部分”。结论:良好的以人为本的临终关怀不仅通过在患者生命的最后几天和几个小时与他们共度的个性化时刻为他们“做好”,而且还照顾到他们的家人和提供护理的护理专业人员。以人为中心的临终关怀方法可以指导未来的研究和实践,使其朝着更有响应性、更具体的方法发展,从而支持养老院的“善终”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书