Mandar Bandekar, Kuldeep D. More, Carlos Palacin-Lizarbe, Jukka Kekäläinen, Jarkko Akkanen
{"title":"Concentration-Dependent Sulphate Enrichment Restructures Microbial Communities and Associated Sulphur–Iron–Nitrogen Dynamics in Freshwater Sediments","authors":"Mandar Bandekar, Kuldeep D. More, Carlos Palacin-Lizarbe, Jukka Kekäläinen, Jarkko Akkanen","doi":"10.1111/fwb.70315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n \n </p><ol>\n \n \n <li>Sulphate input from industrial discharge, mining, and agricultural runoff can significantly alter biogeochemical functions in freshwater systems. However, the concentration- and time-dependent effects of sulphate on geochemistry and microbial communities of lake sediments remain insufficiently characterized.</li>\n \n \n <li>Here, we incubated lake sediment microcosms amended with 1, 5, and 10 mM sulphate under suboxic conditions for 45 days and monitored geochemical and microbial community changes.</li>\n \n \n <li>Sulphate enrichment induced distinct, dose- and time-responsive changes. Nitrate increased progressively with sulphate concentration (10 > 5 > 1 mM), reflecting treatment-specific shifts in nitrogen dynamics under changing redox conditions within sedimentary nitrogen pools. Microbial diversity declined initially across sulphate treatments, peaked at 5 mM, and remained suppressed at 10 mM.</li>\n \n \n <li>Dominant taxa shifted from <i>Geobacter</i> spp. at 1 mM to <i>Citrifermentans</i> spp. and <i>Sulfurospirillum</i> spp. at 10 mM, reflecting redistribution of electron flow among competing iron, sulphur, and nitrogen associated metabolisms at higher sulphate concentrations. Functional predictions suggested enhanced iron respiration at lower sulphate (1 mM), whereas higher concentrations were associated with increased chemoheterotrophy and fermentation, alongside suppression of methanogenesis.</li>\n \n \n <li>Our findings demonstrate that increasing sulphate inputs restructure sedimentary microbial networks and reconfigure redox-linked carbon and nitrogen cycling, suggesting ecosystem-level biogeochemical responses to rising sulphate stress in freshwater catchments.</li>\n </ol>\n \n </div>","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"71 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Freshwater Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fwb.70315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sulphate input from industrial discharge, mining, and agricultural runoff can significantly alter biogeochemical functions in freshwater systems. However, the concentration- and time-dependent effects of sulphate on geochemistry and microbial communities of lake sediments remain insufficiently characterized.
Here, we incubated lake sediment microcosms amended with 1, 5, and 10 mM sulphate under suboxic conditions for 45 days and monitored geochemical and microbial community changes.
Sulphate enrichment induced distinct, dose- and time-responsive changes. Nitrate increased progressively with sulphate concentration (10 > 5 > 1 mM), reflecting treatment-specific shifts in nitrogen dynamics under changing redox conditions within sedimentary nitrogen pools. Microbial diversity declined initially across sulphate treatments, peaked at 5 mM, and remained suppressed at 10 mM.
Dominant taxa shifted from Geobacter spp. at 1 mM to Citrifermentans spp. and Sulfurospirillum spp. at 10 mM, reflecting redistribution of electron flow among competing iron, sulphur, and nitrogen associated metabolisms at higher sulphate concentrations. Functional predictions suggested enhanced iron respiration at lower sulphate (1 mM), whereas higher concentrations were associated with increased chemoheterotrophy and fermentation, alongside suppression of methanogenesis.
Our findings demonstrate that increasing sulphate inputs restructure sedimentary microbial networks and reconfigure redox-linked carbon and nitrogen cycling, suggesting ecosystem-level biogeochemical responses to rising sulphate stress in freshwater catchments.
期刊介绍:
Freshwater Biology publishes papers on all aspects of the ecology of inland waters, including rivers and lakes, ground waters, flood plains and other freshwater wetlands. We include studies of micro-organisms, algae, macrophytes, invertebrates, fish and other vertebrates, as well as those concerning whole systems and related physical and chemical aspects of the environment, provided that they have clear biological relevance.
Studies may focus at any level in the ecological hierarchy from physiological ecology and animal behaviour, through population dynamics and evolutionary genetics, to community interactions, biogeography and ecosystem functioning. They may also be at any scale: from microhabitat to landscape, and continental to global. Preference is given to research, whether meta-analytical, experimental, theoretical or descriptive, highlighting causal (ecological) mechanisms from which clearly stated hypotheses are derived. Manuscripts with an experimental or conceptual flavour are particularly welcome, as are those or which integrate laboratory and field work, and studies from less well researched areas of the world. Priority is given to submissions that are likely to interest a wide range of readers.
We encourage submission of papers well grounded in ecological theory that deal with issues related to the conservation and management of inland waters. Papers interpreting fundamental research in a way that makes clear its applied, strategic or socio-economic relevance are also welcome.
Review articles (FRESHWATER BIOLOGY REVIEWS) and discussion papers (OPINION) are also invited: these enable authors to publish high-quality material outside the constraints of standard research papers.