Clinicians' Impressions of the Developmental Appropriateness of the Ask-Suicide Screening Questions for Children Aged 6-12.

Katherine Sarkisian, Meredith Adams, Meredith Chapman, Jeffrey A Bridge, Elyse Llamocca, Amanda J Thompson, Mindy Westlund Schreiner, Xueting Xia, Jennifer L Hughes
{"title":"Clinicians' Impressions of the Developmental Appropriateness of the Ask-Suicide Screening Questions for Children Aged 6-12.","authors":"Katherine Sarkisian, Meredith Adams, Meredith Chapman, Jeffrey A Bridge, Elyse Llamocca, Amanda J Thompson, Mindy Westlund Schreiner, Xueting Xia, Jennifer L Hughes","doi":"10.1080/23794925.2026.2633991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the suicide rate for children ages 8-12 is increasing, there is not a developmentally adapted suicide risk screener for children younger than 10. Current practices to screen preteen children for suicide risk often include unstructured interviewing and/or suicide risk screeners that are validated for use with older children. It is clinically important to understand the limitations of existing suicide risk screeners when they are used with preteens to inform the design of developmentally appropriate measures and to tailor support for clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the rate at which clinicians in an outpatient crisis clinic indicated that they felt the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) was developmentally inappropriate for children between the ages of 6 and 12.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed electronic medical record data from an outpatient psychiatric crisis clinic, including a suicide risk screening interface that allows clinicians to administer the screener during a clinical encounter or indicate that they feel it is developmentally inappropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentages of suicide risk screening instances where the clinician marked the ASQ as developmentally inappropriate were 72.5% for 6-year-olds, 55.8% for 7-year-olds, 30.1% for 8-year-olds, 11.5% for 9-year-olds, 4.9% for 10-year-olds, 0.9% for 11-year-olds, and 0.5% for 12-year-olds. These results were similar in analyses stratified by race, but the ASQ was determined to be developmentally inappropriate significantly more often for boys than girls (<i>p</i> < .001; 2.8% of screens with girls aged 6-12 vs. 9.0% of screens with boys aged 6-12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings clearly highlight the urgent need to design and test a developmentally adapted suicide risk screener that can be used with preteen children, especially those who are age 10 and younger.</p>","PeriodicalId":524240,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","volume":"11 3","pages":"508-513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2026.2633991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the suicide rate for children ages 8-12 is increasing, there is not a developmentally adapted suicide risk screener for children younger than 10. Current practices to screen preteen children for suicide risk often include unstructured interviewing and/or suicide risk screeners that are validated for use with older children. It is clinically important to understand the limitations of existing suicide risk screeners when they are used with preteens to inform the design of developmentally appropriate measures and to tailor support for clinicians.

Objective: To characterize the rate at which clinicians in an outpatient crisis clinic indicated that they felt the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) was developmentally inappropriate for children between the ages of 6 and 12.

Methods: We analyzed electronic medical record data from an outpatient psychiatric crisis clinic, including a suicide risk screening interface that allows clinicians to administer the screener during a clinical encounter or indicate that they feel it is developmentally inappropriate.

Results: The percentages of suicide risk screening instances where the clinician marked the ASQ as developmentally inappropriate were 72.5% for 6-year-olds, 55.8% for 7-year-olds, 30.1% for 8-year-olds, 11.5% for 9-year-olds, 4.9% for 10-year-olds, 0.9% for 11-year-olds, and 0.5% for 12-year-olds. These results were similar in analyses stratified by race, but the ASQ was determined to be developmentally inappropriate significantly more often for boys than girls (p < .001; 2.8% of screens with girls aged 6-12 vs. 9.0% of screens with boys aged 6-12).

Conclusions: These findings clearly highlight the urgent need to design and test a developmentally adapted suicide risk screener that can be used with preteen children, especially those who are age 10 and younger.

临床医生对6-12岁儿童自杀筛查问题发展适宜性的印象。
背景:虽然8-12岁儿童的自杀率正在上升,但对于10岁以下的儿童,还没有一个适合发育的自杀风险筛查方法。目前筛查青春期前儿童自杀风险的做法通常包括非结构化访谈和/或自杀风险筛查,这些筛查已被证实适用于年龄较大的儿童。当现有的自杀风险筛查用于青春期前儿童时,了解其局限性在临床上是很重要的,这可以为设计适合发育的措施提供信息,并为临床医生提供量身定制的支持。目的:描述门诊危机诊所的临床医生表示他们认为自杀筛查问题(ASQ)不适合6至12岁儿童的比率。方法:我们分析了来自门诊精神危机诊所的电子病历数据,包括自杀风险筛查界面,该界面允许临床医生在临床遇到时进行筛查或表明他们认为这是不合适的。结果:在自杀风险筛查中,临床医生将ASQ标记为发育不适宜者的比例分别为:6岁72.5%,7岁55.8%,8岁30.1%,9岁11.5%,10岁4.9%,11岁0.9%,12岁0.5%。这些结果在按种族分层的分析中是相似的,但是ASQ被确定为男孩比女孩更容易发育不适应(p结论:这些发现清楚地强调了迫切需要设计和测试一个发育适应的自杀风险筛选器,可以用于青春期前的儿童,特别是那些10岁及以下的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书