When are large language models medical devices? Navigating the MDR and AI Act for healthcare applications.

BMJ digital health & AI Pub Date : 2026-10-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjdh-2026-000003
Jessica D Workum, Sade J Krijgsman, Ildiko Vajda, R M Van Stokkum, Jan van de Brand, Diederik Gommers, Ari Ercole, Michel van Genderen
{"title":"When are large language models medical devices? Navigating the MDR and AI Act for healthcare applications.","authors":"Jessica D Workum, Sade J Krijgsman, Ildiko Vajda, R M Van Stokkum, Jan van de Brand, Diederik Gommers, Ari Ercole, Michel van Genderen","doi":"10.1136/bmjdh-2026-000003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The flexibility of generative artificial intelligence (AI), and specifically large language models (LLMs), holds promise to transform healthcare by offering new tools to improve patient care and enhance clinician efficiency. However, this flexibility introduces new challenges, as LLM applications might inadvertently be used in ways that do not align with the intended purpose of the manufacturer, raising patient safety concerns and liability issues. We have identified a regulatory gap whereby LLM applications that could be repurposed, malfunction or be inadvertently misused for medical purposes fall outside the scope of the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) because they lack a medical intended purpose, and outside meaningful AI Act safety obligations because they do not qualify as high-risk systems, yet still present patient safety risks without adequate regulatory guidance. In this manuscript, we aim to address this regulatory gap for LLM applications in healthcare by identifying these ambiguous grey-area applications and providing four recommendations-validation, mitigation, compliance and alignment-focused on prevention and risk mitigation rather than reclassification as medical devices. These recommendations are intended to advance the responsible implementation of LLM applications in healthcare while ensuring patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":524116,"journal":{"name":"BMJ digital health & AI","volume":"2 1","pages":"e000003"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ digital health & AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdh-2026-000003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The flexibility of generative artificial intelligence (AI), and specifically large language models (LLMs), holds promise to transform healthcare by offering new tools to improve patient care and enhance clinician efficiency. However, this flexibility introduces new challenges, as LLM applications might inadvertently be used in ways that do not align with the intended purpose of the manufacturer, raising patient safety concerns and liability issues. We have identified a regulatory gap whereby LLM applications that could be repurposed, malfunction or be inadvertently misused for medical purposes fall outside the scope of the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) because they lack a medical intended purpose, and outside meaningful AI Act safety obligations because they do not qualify as high-risk systems, yet still present patient safety risks without adequate regulatory guidance. In this manuscript, we aim to address this regulatory gap for LLM applications in healthcare by identifying these ambiguous grey-area applications and providing four recommendations-validation, mitigation, compliance and alignment-focused on prevention and risk mitigation rather than reclassification as medical devices. These recommendations are intended to advance the responsible implementation of LLM applications in healthcare while ensuring patient safety.

什么时候大型语言模型是医疗设备?为医疗保健应用程序导航MDR和AI法案。
生成式人工智能(AI)的灵活性,特别是大型语言模型(llm),有望通过提供改善患者护理和提高临床医生效率的新工具来改变医疗保健。然而,这种灵活性带来了新的挑战,因为LLM应用程序可能会无意中以与制造商预期目的不一致的方式使用,从而引起患者安全问题和责任问题。我们已经确定了一个监管缺口,即LLM应用程序可能被重新利用,故障或无意中被滥用于医疗目的,这超出了医疗器械法规(MDR)的范围,因为它们缺乏医疗预期目的,并且超出了有意义的AI法案安全义务,因为它们不符合高风险系统的资格,但在没有足够监管指导的情况下仍然存在患者安全风险。在本文中,我们的目标是通过识别这些模糊的灰色区域应用,并提供四项建议——验证、缓解、合规和对齐——来解决LLM在医疗保健领域应用的监管缺口,这些建议侧重于预防和风险缓解,而不是重新分类为医疗设备。这些建议旨在促进LLM应用程序在医疗保健领域的负责任实施,同时确保患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书