The Impact of Older Age at Diagnosis on Wilms Tumor Characteristics and Patient Outcomes: A Children's Oncology Group Study.

IF 16.4
Michael V Ortiz, Lindsay A Renfro, Ian C Tfirn, Nicholas G Cost, Elisabeth T Tracy, Peter F Ehrlich, Jesse Sandberg, Geetika Khanna, Najat C Daw, Andrew L Hong, Arnold C Paulino, Jessica Gulliver, Jeffrey S Dome, James I Geller, Elizabeth A Mullen
{"title":"The Impact of Older Age at Diagnosis on Wilms Tumor Characteristics and Patient Outcomes: A Children's Oncology Group Study.","authors":"Michael V Ortiz, Lindsay A Renfro, Ian C Tfirn, Nicholas G Cost, Elisabeth T Tracy, Peter F Ehrlich, Jesse Sandberg, Geetika Khanna, Najat C Daw, Andrew L Hong, Arnold C Paulino, Jessica Gulliver, Jeffrey S Dome, James I Geller, Elizabeth A Mullen","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2026.7052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although Wilms tumor (WT) is the most common kidney cancer of childhood, it also presents infrequently in adolescents and even adults. Older patients with WT have inferior survival, but the reasons for this are unclear, and age is not currently used for therapeutic risk stratification. This study evaluates age as a prognostic variable and examines the influence of clinical and biological features on outcomes in a cohort of older patients with WT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We evaluated 4,100 patients with unilateral WT on Children's Oncology Group protocol AREN03B2. \"Standard-age\" patients (age 0-9 years) were compared with those presenting at \"older-age\" (age 10-30 years). The impact of age on survival was evaluated across the entire cohort and stratified by stage and histology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 3,936 standard-age and 164 older-age patients. Older-age patients were more likely to have higher local (P=.009) and overall disease stage (P<.001), larger tumor diameter (P<.001), longer intervals between diagnostic imaging and renal surgery (P<.001), no lymph nodes sampled (P<.001), and treatment that included radiation (P=.010). No older-age patients had WT predisposition syndromes. The effect of age as a continuous variable was significantly associated with worse prognosis for event-free and overall survival after accounting for differences in disease stage and histology. There was neither higher rates of anaplasia nor high-risk tumor cytogenetics in older-age patients to account for this survival disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advancing age is an inferior continuous prognostic risk factor in patients with unilateral WT, independent of conventional risk stratification parameters of stage and histology. Future studies should prospectively interrogate the biology of older-age patients and incorporate advanced age into therapeutic risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":520697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2026.7052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although Wilms tumor (WT) is the most common kidney cancer of childhood, it also presents infrequently in adolescents and even adults. Older patients with WT have inferior survival, but the reasons for this are unclear, and age is not currently used for therapeutic risk stratification. This study evaluates age as a prognostic variable and examines the influence of clinical and biological features on outcomes in a cohort of older patients with WT.

Patients and methods: We evaluated 4,100 patients with unilateral WT on Children's Oncology Group protocol AREN03B2. "Standard-age" patients (age 0-9 years) were compared with those presenting at "older-age" (age 10-30 years). The impact of age on survival was evaluated across the entire cohort and stratified by stage and histology.

Results: There were 3,936 standard-age and 164 older-age patients. Older-age patients were more likely to have higher local (P=.009) and overall disease stage (P<.001), larger tumor diameter (P<.001), longer intervals between diagnostic imaging and renal surgery (P<.001), no lymph nodes sampled (P<.001), and treatment that included radiation (P=.010). No older-age patients had WT predisposition syndromes. The effect of age as a continuous variable was significantly associated with worse prognosis for event-free and overall survival after accounting for differences in disease stage and histology. There was neither higher rates of anaplasia nor high-risk tumor cytogenetics in older-age patients to account for this survival disadvantage.

Conclusions: Advancing age is an inferior continuous prognostic risk factor in patients with unilateral WT, independent of conventional risk stratification parameters of stage and histology. Future studies should prospectively interrogate the biology of older-age patients and incorporate advanced age into therapeutic risk stratification.

诊断年龄对Wilms肿瘤特征和患者预后的影响:一项儿童肿瘤组研究。
背景:虽然肾母细胞瘤(Wilms tumor, WT)是儿童最常见的肾癌,但在青少年甚至成人中也不常见。老年WT患者生存率较低,但其原因尚不清楚,目前也没有将年龄用于治疗风险分层。本研究评估了年龄作为预后变量,并检查了临床和生物学特征对老年WT患者预后的影响。患者和方法:我们根据儿童肿瘤组方案AREN03B2评估了4100例单侧WT患者。将“标准年龄”患者(0-9岁)与“高龄”患者(10-30岁)进行比较。在整个队列中评估年龄对生存的影响,并按分期和组织学分层。结果:标准年龄3936例,高龄患者164例。年龄较大的患者更可能具有较高的局部(P= 0.009)和总体疾病分期(P)。结论:年龄增大是单侧WT患者较差的持续预后危险因素,独立于分期和组织学的常规风险分层参数。未来的研究应前瞻性地询问老年患者的生物学,并将高龄纳入治疗风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书