Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage Trajectories Are Associated With Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

IF 0.9
Neurosurgery practice Pub Date : 2026-10-08 eCollection Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000306
Hera A Kamdar, Matthew J Cobler-Lichter, Joanna Yang, Joseph J Locascio, Elizabeth Woods, Bradford B Thompson, Ali Mahta, DaiWai M Olson, Sayona John, Wazim Mohamed, Monisha Kumar, Christopher J Stapleton, Aman B Patel, Guy A Rordorf, David Y Chung
{"title":"Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage Trajectories Are Associated With Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.","authors":"Hera A Kamdar, Matthew J Cobler-Lichter, Joanna Yang, Joseph J Locascio, Elizabeth Woods, Bradford B Thompson, Ali Mahta, DaiWai M Olson, Sayona John, Wazim Mohamed, Monisha Kumar, Christopher J Stapleton, Aman B Patel, Guy A Rordorf, David Y Chung","doi":"10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Predicting the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains challenging, particularly among patients requiring prolonged external ventricular drainage (EVD). Existing predictors largely rely on static clinical or radiographic features and may not capture how cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage evolves over time. We evaluated whether longitudinal CSF drainage trajectories, adjusted for EVD height, were associated with VPS placement after aSAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study of 149 adults with aSAH treated with EVDs at 6 US neurocritical care centers. Daily CSF drainage volume, EVD height, time from EVD placement, and VPS placement were analyzed using mixed-effects modeling to assess differences in CSF drainage trajectories over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients (22.8%) underwent VPS placement. Patients who underwent VPS placement had longer EVD duration and higher average daily and total CSF drainage during hospitalization. In longitudinal models adjusted for EVD height, CSF drainage trajectories diverged over time. Divergence emerged after day 8 from EVD placement, with CSF output declining more rapidly in patients who did not undergo VPS placement, whereas drainage remained more sustained in patients who underwent VPS placement. By day 18, height-adjusted CSF drainage was significantly higher among patients who underwent VPS placement. Among patients with EVD drainage for 18 days or longer, fewer than half underwent VPS placement, highlighting persistent uncertainty in this clinically challenging subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longitudinal CSF drainage trajectories, adjusted for EVD height, were associated with VPS placement after aSAH. Differences in CSF drainage trajectories emerged after day 8 and became more pronounced during prolonged EVD management. These findings suggest that longitudinal CSF drainage trajectories may complement static clinical and radiographic predictors in future shunt prediction models and studies of EVD weaning.</p>","PeriodicalId":74298,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery practice","volume":"7 5","pages":"e000306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13645469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Predicting the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains challenging, particularly among patients requiring prolonged external ventricular drainage (EVD). Existing predictors largely rely on static clinical or radiographic features and may not capture how cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage evolves over time. We evaluated whether longitudinal CSF drainage trajectories, adjusted for EVD height, were associated with VPS placement after aSAH.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study of 149 adults with aSAH treated with EVDs at 6 US neurocritical care centers. Daily CSF drainage volume, EVD height, time from EVD placement, and VPS placement were analyzed using mixed-effects modeling to assess differences in CSF drainage trajectories over time.

Results: Thirty-four patients (22.8%) underwent VPS placement. Patients who underwent VPS placement had longer EVD duration and higher average daily and total CSF drainage during hospitalization. In longitudinal models adjusted for EVD height, CSF drainage trajectories diverged over time. Divergence emerged after day 8 from EVD placement, with CSF output declining more rapidly in patients who did not undergo VPS placement, whereas drainage remained more sustained in patients who underwent VPS placement. By day 18, height-adjusted CSF drainage was significantly higher among patients who underwent VPS placement. Among patients with EVD drainage for 18 days or longer, fewer than half underwent VPS placement, highlighting persistent uncertainty in this clinically challenging subgroup.

Conclusion: Longitudinal CSF drainage trajectories, adjusted for EVD height, were associated with VPS placement after aSAH. Differences in CSF drainage trajectories emerged after day 8 and became more pronounced during prolonged EVD management. These findings suggest that longitudinal CSF drainage trajectories may complement static clinical and radiographic predictors in future shunt prediction models and studies of EVD weaning.

动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后脑脊液引流轨迹与脑室-腹腔分流放置相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书