Comparison of kinesio taping and myofascial release therapy in cervicogenic headache: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Fatma Çağlayan Ağır, Şerife Çöklü, Savaş Karpuz, Ayşe Güleç, Halil Ekrem Akkurt, Halim Yılmaz
{"title":"Comparison of kinesio taping and myofascial release therapy in cervicogenic headache: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Fatma Çağlayan Ağır, Şerife Çöklü, Savaş Karpuz, Ayşe Güleç, Halil Ekrem Akkurt, Halim Yılmaz","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2026.2744814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short-term efficacy of kinesio taping (KT) and myofascial release (MFR), combined with home exercise, on pain, disability, quality of life, and headache frequency in patients with cervicogenic headache (CGH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Meram State Hospital, Konya, Turkey, from February to August 2025. Eighty-one patients were randomized to KT plus home exercise, MFR plus home exercise, or home exercise alone (<i>n</i> = 27 each). Interventions lasted 4 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and one month later using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Headache Disability Inventory (HDI), Short Form-12 (SF-12), and a headache diary for duration and frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both KT and MFR groups improved in VAS, HIT-6, HDI, SF-12, and headache frequency compared with baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while the home exercise group showed limited changes. KT and MFR were superior to home exercise alone, with no significant difference between them. HDI improvement was significant only post-treatment in the KT group, whereas the MFR group improved both post-treatment and at one-month follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KT and MFR combined with home exercise are effective short-term treatments for CGH. MFR may provide more sustained improvements in disability and physical quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2744814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the short-term efficacy of kinesio taping (KT) and myofascial release (MFR), combined with home exercise, on pain, disability, quality of life, and headache frequency in patients with cervicogenic headache (CGH).

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Meram State Hospital, Konya, Turkey, from February to August 2025. Eighty-one patients were randomized to KT plus home exercise, MFR plus home exercise, or home exercise alone (n = 27 each). Interventions lasted 4 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and one month later using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Headache Disability Inventory (HDI), Short Form-12 (SF-12), and a headache diary for duration and frequency.

Results: Both KT and MFR groups improved in VAS, HIT-6, HDI, SF-12, and headache frequency compared with baseline (p < 0.05), while the home exercise group showed limited changes. KT and MFR were superior to home exercise alone, with no significant difference between them. HDI improvement was significant only post-treatment in the KT group, whereas the MFR group improved both post-treatment and at one-month follow-up (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: KT and MFR combined with home exercise are effective short-term treatments for CGH. MFR may provide more sustained improvements in disability and physical quality of life.

颈源性头痛的运动贴敷与肌筋膜释放疗法的比较:一项随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书