Fatma Çağlayan Ağır, Şerife Çöklü, Savaş Karpuz, Ayşe Güleç, Halil Ekrem Akkurt, Halim Yılmaz
{"title":"Comparison of kinesio taping and myofascial release therapy in cervicogenic headache: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Fatma Çağlayan Ağır, Şerife Çöklü, Savaş Karpuz, Ayşe Güleç, Halil Ekrem Akkurt, Halim Yılmaz","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2026.2744814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short-term efficacy of kinesio taping (KT) and myofascial release (MFR), combined with home exercise, on pain, disability, quality of life, and headache frequency in patients with cervicogenic headache (CGH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Meram State Hospital, Konya, Turkey, from February to August 2025. Eighty-one patients were randomized to KT plus home exercise, MFR plus home exercise, or home exercise alone (<i>n</i> = 27 each). Interventions lasted 4 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and one month later using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Headache Disability Inventory (HDI), Short Form-12 (SF-12), and a headache diary for duration and frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both KT and MFR groups improved in VAS, HIT-6, HDI, SF-12, and headache frequency compared with baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while the home exercise group showed limited changes. KT and MFR were superior to home exercise alone, with no significant difference between them. HDI improvement was significant only post-treatment in the KT group, whereas the MFR group improved both post-treatment and at one-month follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KT and MFR combined with home exercise are effective short-term treatments for CGH. MFR may provide more sustained improvements in disability and physical quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2744814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the short-term efficacy of kinesio taping (KT) and myofascial release (MFR), combined with home exercise, on pain, disability, quality of life, and headache frequency in patients with cervicogenic headache (CGH).
Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Meram State Hospital, Konya, Turkey, from February to August 2025. Eighty-one patients were randomized to KT plus home exercise, MFR plus home exercise, or home exercise alone (n = 27 each). Interventions lasted 4 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and one month later using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Headache Disability Inventory (HDI), Short Form-12 (SF-12), and a headache diary for duration and frequency.
Results: Both KT and MFR groups improved in VAS, HIT-6, HDI, SF-12, and headache frequency compared with baseline (p < 0.05), while the home exercise group showed limited changes. KT and MFR were superior to home exercise alone, with no significant difference between them. HDI improvement was significant only post-treatment in the KT group, whereas the MFR group improved both post-treatment and at one-month follow-up (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: KT and MFR combined with home exercise are effective short-term treatments for CGH. MFR may provide more sustained improvements in disability and physical quality of life.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.