Telecardiology bridges the gap in pediatric heart care: A systematic review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Youmna Faheem, Abhishek Adhikari, Paula Espinosa-Villagomez, Camila Astudillo-Silva, Michael Olaseni Bamgbose, Nicolas Hidalgo Corral
{"title":"Telecardiology bridges the gap in pediatric heart care: A systematic review.","authors":"Youmna Faheem, Abhishek Adhikari, Paula Espinosa-Villagomez, Camila Astudillo-Silva, Michael Olaseni Bamgbose, Nicolas Hidalgo Corral","doi":"10.1177/1357633X261491800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundGeographic disparities limit access to pediatric cardiology care in rural and underserved communities, contributing to delayed diagnosis, increased transfers, higher costs, and preventable morbidity. Telecardiology has emerged as a scalable strategy to address subspecialty workforce shortages. This review evaluates the effectiveness of telecardiology versus standard in-person care in improving diagnostic timeliness, access to specialist care, and clinical outcomes; its diagnostic accuracy relative to in-person evaluation; and barriers to implementation, in pediatric populations with congenital or acquired heart disease in rural or underserved communities.MethodsPubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched, identifying 1200 articles; 182 underwent full-text review. After exclusions, 74 studies were quality appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and 49 high-quality studies were included, evaluating synchronous tele echocardiography, asynchronous store and forward transmission, or remote physiologic monitoring in pediatric patients in rural or resource limited settings.ResultsAcross the 49 included studies, tele echocardiography demonstrated diagnostic concordance ≥98% versus in person evaluation, and fetal telecardiology achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity for complex congenital heart disease in select programs. In the included studies, telecardiology reduced time to diagnosis (100 vs. 147 min, <i>P </i>< .001), interfacility transport by up to 58%, and emergency department utilization (0.4-0.0 visits per patient month in one interstage monitoring program, <i>P = </i>0.0004). Hospital survival improved from 29.8% to 54.1% (<i>P = </i>0.002) in one ECMO program, and post Stage II palliation complications decreased from 34.1% to 18.4% (<i>P = </i>0.02). Cost analyses showed net savings across settings. Barriers included broadband limitations, reimbursement constraints, and regulatory challenges.ConclusionsTelecardiology is a high-impact, evidence-based strategy that can improve diagnostic efficiency, reduce interfacility transfers, lower healthcare utilization, and expand access to pediatric cardiology care without compromising outcomes when implemented with adequate sonographer training and infrastructure investment; consistent with clinical experience, these requirements have limited adoption of store-and-forward fetal echocardiography at some centers. Addressing reimbursement and regulatory barriers is essential for equitable, sustainable implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X261491800"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X261491800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundGeographic disparities limit access to pediatric cardiology care in rural and underserved communities, contributing to delayed diagnosis, increased transfers, higher costs, and preventable morbidity. Telecardiology has emerged as a scalable strategy to address subspecialty workforce shortages. This review evaluates the effectiveness of telecardiology versus standard in-person care in improving diagnostic timeliness, access to specialist care, and clinical outcomes; its diagnostic accuracy relative to in-person evaluation; and barriers to implementation, in pediatric populations with congenital or acquired heart disease in rural or underserved communities.MethodsPubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched, identifying 1200 articles; 182 underwent full-text review. After exclusions, 74 studies were quality appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and 49 high-quality studies were included, evaluating synchronous tele echocardiography, asynchronous store and forward transmission, or remote physiologic monitoring in pediatric patients in rural or resource limited settings.ResultsAcross the 49 included studies, tele echocardiography demonstrated diagnostic concordance ≥98% versus in person evaluation, and fetal telecardiology achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity for complex congenital heart disease in select programs. In the included studies, telecardiology reduced time to diagnosis (100 vs. 147 min, P < .001), interfacility transport by up to 58%, and emergency department utilization (0.4-0.0 visits per patient month in one interstage monitoring program, P = 0.0004). Hospital survival improved from 29.8% to 54.1% (P = 0.002) in one ECMO program, and post Stage II palliation complications decreased from 34.1% to 18.4% (P = 0.02). Cost analyses showed net savings across settings. Barriers included broadband limitations, reimbursement constraints, and regulatory challenges.ConclusionsTelecardiology is a high-impact, evidence-based strategy that can improve diagnostic efficiency, reduce interfacility transfers, lower healthcare utilization, and expand access to pediatric cardiology care without compromising outcomes when implemented with adequate sonographer training and infrastructure investment; consistent with clinical experience, these requirements have limited adoption of store-and-forward fetal echocardiography at some centers. Addressing reimbursement and regulatory barriers is essential for equitable, sustainable implementation.

心脏远程学弥合了儿童心脏护理的差距:一项系统综述。
地理差异限制了农村和服务不足社区获得儿科心脏病护理的机会,导致诊断延误、转诊增加、费用增加和可预防的发病率。远程心脏病学已成为解决亚专科劳动力短缺的可扩展策略。本综述评估了心脏远程学与标准现场护理在提高诊断及时性、获得专科护理和临床结果方面的有效性;其诊断准确性相对于现场评估;以及在农村或服务不足社区患有先天性或获得性心脏病的儿科人群中实施的障碍。方法检索spubmed、Medline、Scopus和b谷歌Scholar,共收录1200篇文献;182个进行了全文审查。排除后,使用Joanna Briggs Institute检查表对74项研究进行质量评价,并纳入49项高质量研究,评估农村或资源有限地区儿科患者的同步远程超声心动图、异步存储和转发或远程生理监测。结果在纳入的49项研究中,远程超声心动图的诊断一致性与真人评估相比≥98%,胎儿远程心动图在某些项目中对复杂先天性心脏病的敏感性和特异性达到100%。在纳入的研究中,心电学缩短了诊断时间(100分钟vs 147分钟,P = 0.0004)。在一个ECMO方案中,住院生存率从29.8%提高到54.1% (P = 0.002), II期后姑息并发症从34.1%降低到18.4% (P = 0.02)。成本分析显示各种设置均可节省成本。障碍包括宽带限制、报销限制和监管挑战。结论:超声心动图是一种高影响力、基于证据的策略,在充分培训超声医师和基础设施投资的情况下,可以提高诊断效率,减少机构间转移,降低医疗保健利用率,扩大儿科心脏病护理的可及性,同时不影响结果;与临床经验一致,这些要求限制了在一些中心采用存储向前胎儿超声心动图。解决报销和监管障碍对于公平、可持续的实施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书