Analytical and Clinical Validation of the Oncomine Dx Express Test, an In Vitro Diagnostic-Labeled Assay, for Genomic Profiling of FFPE Tumor Samples.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Angie Cheng, Sumitha Nallu, Luming He, April Bigley, Aline Bridi, Emilia Ostrowska, Thilanka Jayaweera, Madhu Jasti, Daniela Garcia, Molly Fehon, Thomas Bowden, Nader Ezzedine, Diarra Hassel, Swasti Raut, Erik Breitenfeldt, Alina Dykman, Tasha Delacour, Brian Hradecky, Andrew Hatch, Stephen Wunsch, Gokhan Yavas, Del Rodrigo, Jeoffrey Schageman, Elena Kuzmenko, Jessie Wang, Vrunda Sheth, Eun Ji Kim, Hsueh Ping Chao, John Williamson, Hans Gripkey, José Luis Costa, Cecília Durães, Anne Marie Velasco Roth
{"title":"Analytical and Clinical Validation of the Oncomine Dx Express Test, an In Vitro Diagnostic-Labeled Assay, for Genomic Profiling of FFPE Tumor Samples.","authors":"Angie Cheng, Sumitha Nallu, Luming He, April Bigley, Aline Bridi, Emilia Ostrowska, Thilanka Jayaweera, Madhu Jasti, Daniela Garcia, Molly Fehon, Thomas Bowden, Nader Ezzedine, Diarra Hassel, Swasti Raut, Erik Breitenfeldt, Alina Dykman, Tasha Delacour, Brian Hradecky, Andrew Hatch, Stephen Wunsch, Gokhan Yavas, Del Rodrigo, Jeoffrey Schageman, Elena Kuzmenko, Jessie Wang, Vrunda Sheth, Eun Ji Kim, Hsueh Ping Chao, John Williamson, Hans Gripkey, José Luis Costa, Cecília Durães, Anne Marie Velasco Roth","doi":"10.1007/s40291-026-00884-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genomic profiling of solid tumors by next-generation sequencing (NGS) supports personalized therapy selection, but routine clinical adoption requires robust analytical and clinical validation. The Oncomine™ Dx Express Test (ODxET) is a companion diagnostic and tumor profiling in vitro diagnostic NGS assay for detecting targeted single- and multinucleotide variants (SNVs/MNVs), insertions, deletions, copy number variations (CNVs), and RNA fusions or splice variants in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) solid tumor samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective, blinded analytical study, 462 FFPE samples representing 15 tumor types and including 76 wild-type samples, were analyzed with ODxET and compared with validated orthogonal methods. Reproducibility and repeatability were evaluated across three sites, each using two operators, two sequencers, three reagent lots, and two replicates. Clinical performance for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion detection was assessed using non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples from the WU-KONG1B sunvozertinib clinical trial and commercially sourced biomarker-negative specimens, with clinical effectiveness evaluated in patients treated with the approved sunvozertinib dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ODxET assay showed high analytical concordance for EGFR exon 20 insertions, with a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 100% and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 95.5%. Across the reportable range of profiling variant classes, the ODxET assay also showed high analytical concordance with orthogonal methods for SNVs (PPA = 99.5%, NPA = 100%), insertions and deletions (PPA and NPA = 100%), CNVs (PPA = 94.2%, NPA = 99.3%), and RNA variants (PPA = 95.9%, NPA = 100%). DNA variant repeatability was 100%, except for one BRAF p.V600E instance (NPA = 97.1%). RNA repeatability ranged from 88.9% (ALK fusion) to 100%. Similarly, the ODxET assay showed high clinical concordance with the clinical trial assays for EGFR exon 20 insertions, with a PPA of 97.9%, a NPA of 100%, and an overall percent agreement (OPA) of 98.9%. In the ODxET EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive/clinical trial assay-positive subgroup, response rates were consistent with those observed in the overall sunvozertinib trial population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the analytical concordance, reproducibility, and clinical utility of the ODxET assay for molecular profiling of FFPE solid tumor samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":49797,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-026-00884-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Genomic profiling of solid tumors by next-generation sequencing (NGS) supports personalized therapy selection, but routine clinical adoption requires robust analytical and clinical validation. The Oncomine™ Dx Express Test (ODxET) is a companion diagnostic and tumor profiling in vitro diagnostic NGS assay for detecting targeted single- and multinucleotide variants (SNVs/MNVs), insertions, deletions, copy number variations (CNVs), and RNA fusions or splice variants in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) solid tumor samples.

Methods: In a retrospective, blinded analytical study, 462 FFPE samples representing 15 tumor types and including 76 wild-type samples, were analyzed with ODxET and compared with validated orthogonal methods. Reproducibility and repeatability were evaluated across three sites, each using two operators, two sequencers, three reagent lots, and two replicates. Clinical performance for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion detection was assessed using non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples from the WU-KONG1B sunvozertinib clinical trial and commercially sourced biomarker-negative specimens, with clinical effectiveness evaluated in patients treated with the approved sunvozertinib dose.

Results: The ODxET assay showed high analytical concordance for EGFR exon 20 insertions, with a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 100% and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 95.5%. Across the reportable range of profiling variant classes, the ODxET assay also showed high analytical concordance with orthogonal methods for SNVs (PPA = 99.5%, NPA = 100%), insertions and deletions (PPA and NPA = 100%), CNVs (PPA = 94.2%, NPA = 99.3%), and RNA variants (PPA = 95.9%, NPA = 100%). DNA variant repeatability was 100%, except for one BRAF p.V600E instance (NPA = 97.1%). RNA repeatability ranged from 88.9% (ALK fusion) to 100%. Similarly, the ODxET assay showed high clinical concordance with the clinical trial assays for EGFR exon 20 insertions, with a PPA of 97.9%, a NPA of 100%, and an overall percent agreement (OPA) of 98.9%. In the ODxET EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive/clinical trial assay-positive subgroup, response rates were consistent with those observed in the overall sunvozertinib trial population.

Conclusions: These findings support the analytical concordance, reproducibility, and clinical utility of the ODxET assay for molecular profiling of FFPE solid tumor samples.

Oncomine Dx Express测试的分析和临床验证,这是一种体外诊断标记法,用于FFPE肿瘤样本的基因组分析。
背景:通过下一代测序(NGS)对实体肿瘤进行基因组分析支持个性化治疗选择,但常规临床应用需要强有力的分析和临床验证。Oncomine™Dx Express Test (ODxET)是一种伴随诊断和肿瘤分析的体外诊断NGS检测方法,用于检测福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)实体肿瘤样品中的靶向单核苷酸和多核苷酸变异(snv / mnv)、插入、缺失、拷贝数变异(cnv)和RNA融合或剪切变异。方法:在一项回顾性、盲法分析研究中,采用ODxET对15种肿瘤类型的462例FFPE样本进行分析,其中包括76例野生型样本,并与经过验证的正交方法进行比较。在三个位点评估再现性和可重复性,每个位点使用两个操作员,两个测序仪,三个试剂批次和两个重复。使用WU-KONG1B sunvozertinib临床试验中的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)样本和商业来源的生物标志物阴性样本评估了表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)外显子20插入检测的临床性能,并评估了接受批准剂量sunvozertinib治疗的患者的临床有效性。结果:ODxET检测显示EGFR外显子20插入的分析一致性很高,阳性一致性(PPA)为100%,阴性一致性(NPA)为95.5%。在可报告的分析变异类别范围内,ODxET分析在snv (PPA = 99.5%, NPA = 100%)、插入和缺失(PPA和NPA = 100%)、cnv (PPA = 94.2%, NPA = 99.3%)和RNA变异(PPA = 95.9%, NPA = 100%)方面也与正交方法显示出高度的分析一致性。除1例BRAF p.V600E外,DNA变异的重复性为100% (NPA = 97.1%)。RNA的重复性从88.9% (ALK融合)到100%不等。同样,ODxET检测与EGFR外显子20插入的临床试验检测显示出高度的临床一致性,PPA为97.9%,NPA为100%,总体百分比一致性(OPA)为98.9%。在ODxET EGFR外显子20插入阳性/临床试验检测阳性亚组中,缓解率与在整个舜沃西替尼试验人群中观察到的一致。结论:这些发现支持ODxET分析FFPE实体瘤样本分子谱分析的一致性、可重复性和临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy welcomes current opinion articles on emerging or contentious issues, comprehensive narrative reviews, systematic reviews (as outlined by the PRISMA statement), original research articles (including short communications) and letters to the editor. All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书