Christoffer Børsheim, Cathrine H Feier, Carlos Gevers-Montoro, Mark Thomas, Anika Young, Jan Hartvigsen
{"title":"Chiropractic patient compensation claims in Norway from 2013 to 2024.","authors":"Christoffer Børsheim, Cathrine H Feier, Carlos Gevers-Montoro, Mark Thomas, Anika Young, Jan Hartvigsen","doi":"10.1186/s12998-026-00684-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compensation claims represent a selective subset of adverse events in healthcare and provide insight into patient safety. Compensation claims vary between countries and jurisdictions due to administrative, legal, and clinical differences. This study aimed to describe compensation claims related to chiropractic consultations in Norway from 2013 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective registry study using data from the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation and national chiropractic consultation data. All completed claims associated with chiropractic care between 2013 and 2024 were included regardless of whether they were approved or rejected. Claim frequencies were calculated per 100,000 consultations and per first-assessment consultations. Descriptive analyses were used to summarise results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 claims were filed during the study period, of which 17 (12%) were approved. Over 24 million chiropractic consultations were recorded for the period, corresponding to an average annual claim approval rate of 0.1 per 100,000 consultations and 0.5 per 100,000 first-assessment consultations. Most claims involved musculoskeletal conditions (89%). High approval proportions were observed for claims related to central nervous system and circulatory disturbances (60%). The most common reasons for rejection were lack of causation and absence of healthcare failure. Total compensation amounted to 21.7 million Norwegian Kroner (~ 2.2 million Euros).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compensation claims related to chiropractic care in Norway are rare relative to consultation volume, and only a small proportion were approved. Most claimants presented with common musculoskeletal conditions, while approved cases often involve serious events temporally associated with chiropractic consultations. These findings contribute updated national evidence on compensation claims in chiropractic practice and may inform quality improvement and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13647709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-026-00684-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Compensation claims represent a selective subset of adverse events in healthcare and provide insight into patient safety. Compensation claims vary between countries and jurisdictions due to administrative, legal, and clinical differences. This study aimed to describe compensation claims related to chiropractic consultations in Norway from 2013 to 2024.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective registry study using data from the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation and national chiropractic consultation data. All completed claims associated with chiropractic care between 2013 and 2024 were included regardless of whether they were approved or rejected. Claim frequencies were calculated per 100,000 consultations and per first-assessment consultations. Descriptive analyses were used to summarise results.
Results: A total of 147 claims were filed during the study period, of which 17 (12%) were approved. Over 24 million chiropractic consultations were recorded for the period, corresponding to an average annual claim approval rate of 0.1 per 100,000 consultations and 0.5 per 100,000 first-assessment consultations. Most claims involved musculoskeletal conditions (89%). High approval proportions were observed for claims related to central nervous system and circulatory disturbances (60%). The most common reasons for rejection were lack of causation and absence of healthcare failure. Total compensation amounted to 21.7 million Norwegian Kroner (~ 2.2 million Euros).
Conclusions: Compensation claims related to chiropractic care in Norway are rare relative to consultation volume, and only a small proportion were approved. Most claimants presented with common musculoskeletal conditions, while approved cases often involve serious events temporally associated with chiropractic consultations. These findings contribute updated national evidence on compensation claims in chiropractic practice and may inform quality improvement and policy.
期刊介绍:
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies publishes manuscripts on all aspects of evidence-based information that is clinically relevant to chiropractors, manual therapists and related health care professionals.
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies is an open access journal that aims to provide chiropractors, manual therapists and related health professionals with clinically relevant, evidence-based information. Chiropractic and other manual therapies share a relatively broad diagnostic practice and treatment scope, emphasizing the structure and function of the body''s musculoskeletal framework (especially the spine). The practices of chiropractic and manual therapies are closely associated with treatments including manipulation, which is a key intervention. The range of services provided can also include massage, mobilisation, physical therapies, dry needling, lifestyle and dietary counselling, plus a variety of other associated therapeutic and rehabilitation approaches.
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies continues to serve as a critical resource in this field, and as an open access publication, is more readily available to practitioners, researchers and clinicians worldwide.