Barriers and facilitators to deprescribing in primary care in Brazil: a qualitative study of pharmacists' perspectives mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-26 DOI:10.53886/gga.e0000523_en
Milena Flores de Melo, Priscila Ribeiro Castro, Rafael Mota Pinheiro, Michael Alan Steinman, Patrick Alexander Wachholz, Marcio Galvão Oliveira
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to deprescribing in primary care in Brazil: a qualitative study of pharmacists' perspectives mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.","authors":"Milena Flores de Melo, Priscila Ribeiro Castro, Rafael Mota Pinheiro, Michael Alan Steinman, Patrick Alexander Wachholz, Marcio Galvão Oliveira","doi":"10.53886/gga.e0000523_en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the main Barriers and facilitators to deprescribing from the perspective of primary care pharmacists in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative secondary analysis, we analyzed brief written responses collected during a training session on medication deprescribing. Data were elicited through a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats)-based structured activity and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Emerging categories were subsequently interpreted through the Theoretical Domains Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were categorized into barriers (related to healthcare professionals, service structure, patients, and the healthcare model) and facilitators (advances in evidence, benefits of deprescribing, availability of resources, management support, and favorable attitudes among professionals and patients). These categories were mapped to Theoretical Domains Framework domains, including Beliefs about Consequences, Environmental Context and Resources, Social Influences, and Social/Professional Role and Identity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing deprescribing in Brazil faces challenges but prospects are also promising. Adopting interprofessional approaches, educating patients, involving management, and investing in resources to strengthen primary health care are essential to optimize clinical outcomes and reduce health-related costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13645382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e0000523_en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify the main Barriers and facilitators to deprescribing from the perspective of primary care pharmacists in Brazil.

Methods: In this qualitative secondary analysis, we analyzed brief written responses collected during a training session on medication deprescribing. Data were elicited through a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats)-based structured activity and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Emerging categories were subsequently interpreted through the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Results: Responses were categorized into barriers (related to healthcare professionals, service structure, patients, and the healthcare model) and facilitators (advances in evidence, benefits of deprescribing, availability of resources, management support, and favorable attitudes among professionals and patients). These categories were mapped to Theoretical Domains Framework domains, including Beliefs about Consequences, Environmental Context and Resources, Social Influences, and Social/Professional Role and Identity.

Conclusion: Implementing deprescribing in Brazil faces challenges but prospects are also promising. Adopting interprofessional approaches, educating patients, involving management, and investing in resources to strengthen primary health care are essential to optimize clinical outcomes and reduce health-related costs.

障碍和促进在巴西的初级保健处方:药剂师的观点映射到理论领域框架的定性研究。
目的:从巴西初级保健药师的角度分析处方化的主要障碍和促进因素。方法:在定性的二次分析中,我们分析了在药物处方培训期间收集的简短书面回复。数据是通过基于SWOT(优势、劣势、机会和威胁)的结构化活动得出的,并使用定性内容分析进行分析。新兴类别随后通过理论领域框架进行解释。结果:反馈被分类为障碍(与医疗保健专业人员、服务结构、患者和医疗保健模式相关)和促进因素(证据的进展、处方的好处、资源的可用性、管理支持以及专业人员和患者的良好态度)。这些类别被映射到理论领域框架领域,包括关于后果的信念、环境背景和资源、社会影响、社会/职业角色和身份。结论:在巴西实施处方化面临挑战,但前景也很光明。采用跨专业方法、对患者进行教育、让管理层参与以及投资资源以加强初级卫生保健,对于优化临床结果和降低卫生相关成本至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书