Stavroula Triantafyllidou, Michaela Christina Tsangala, Eleni Argyroula Tsounia, Chrysoula Moscholouri, Thomas Besios, George Paras, Alfonso Trinidad Morales, Konstantinos Chandolias
{"title":"Greek Translation and Preliminary Test-Retest Reliability of the AQUA CHILD Questionnaire in Children With Developmental Disabilities.","authors":"Stavroula Triantafyllidou, Michaela Christina Tsangala, Eleni Argyroula Tsounia, Chrysoula Moscholouri, Thomas Besios, George Paras, Alfonso Trinidad Morales, Konstantinos Chandolias","doi":"10.1002/pri.70357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>AQUA CHILD is a parent-proxy questionnaire for pre-aquatic assessment. This study describes its Greek translation and examines preliminary test-retest agreement, with explicit verification of response coding and the limits of score interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a methodological repeated-measures study, 47 parents completed the questionnaire 7 days apart. The retained electronic paired files contained 99 of the 102 numbered items on the supplied forms. Swimming responses were analysed categorically; 20 non-swimming domain summaries were analysed as exploratory raw-code sums, excluding non-applicable responses and using complete domain pairs (n = 43-47). Intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement, ICC(A, 1), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), systematic differences, measurement-error estimates, and participant-level Bland-Altman analyses were calculated. No overall score was retained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Swimming-item exact agreement was 91.5%-97.9% (unweighted kappa, 0.899-0.974). Non-swimming ICCs ranged from 0.878 to 0.968, with lower 95% CI limits of 0.786-0.942. Only undertaking a single task retained a mean retest increase after Holm adjustment: 0.22 raw-code points (95% CI, 0.09-0.34; adjusted p = 0.019). Baseline domain alpha coefficients ranged from -0.375 to 0.329. At T2, 41 non-swimming responses from 24 of 47 participants were 'not relevant', all 'not capable' at T1; none were 'not relevant' at T1. Two domain analyses used incomplete item sets. Normal-theory limits of agreement were sensitive to the discrete, zero-heavy differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These estimates describe the retained electronic records. The original paper questionnaires are no longer available, so the accuracy and origin of the 41 transitions could not be independently verified; this unresolved data-quality issue may bias reliability estimates. Unconfirmed clinical stability, incomplete adaptation records, and missing items further limit inference. The findings do not establish validated domain scales, diagnosis-specific reliability, or an overall score. Prospective validation with independent source-data verification remains necessary before individual treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"31 4","pages":"e70357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13648008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: AQUA CHILD is a parent-proxy questionnaire for pre-aquatic assessment. This study describes its Greek translation and examines preliminary test-retest agreement, with explicit verification of response coding and the limits of score interpretation.
Methods: In a methodological repeated-measures study, 47 parents completed the questionnaire 7 days apart. The retained electronic paired files contained 99 of the 102 numbered items on the supplied forms. Swimming responses were analysed categorically; 20 non-swimming domain summaries were analysed as exploratory raw-code sums, excluding non-applicable responses and using complete domain pairs (n = 43-47). Intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement, ICC(A, 1), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), systematic differences, measurement-error estimates, and participant-level Bland-Altman analyses were calculated. No overall score was retained.
Results: Swimming-item exact agreement was 91.5%-97.9% (unweighted kappa, 0.899-0.974). Non-swimming ICCs ranged from 0.878 to 0.968, with lower 95% CI limits of 0.786-0.942. Only undertaking a single task retained a mean retest increase after Holm adjustment: 0.22 raw-code points (95% CI, 0.09-0.34; adjusted p = 0.019). Baseline domain alpha coefficients ranged from -0.375 to 0.329. At T2, 41 non-swimming responses from 24 of 47 participants were 'not relevant', all 'not capable' at T1; none were 'not relevant' at T1. Two domain analyses used incomplete item sets. Normal-theory limits of agreement were sensitive to the discrete, zero-heavy differences.
Discussion: These estimates describe the retained electronic records. The original paper questionnaires are no longer available, so the accuracy and origin of the 41 transitions could not be independently verified; this unresolved data-quality issue may bias reliability estimates. Unconfirmed clinical stability, incomplete adaptation records, and missing items further limit inference. The findings do not establish validated domain scales, diagnosis-specific reliability, or an overall score. Prospective validation with independent source-data verification remains necessary before individual treatment decisions.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.