Greek Translation and Preliminary Test-Retest Reliability of the AQUA CHILD Questionnaire in Children With Developmental Disabilities.

IF 1.7 Q3 REHABILITATION
Stavroula Triantafyllidou, Michaela Christina Tsangala, Eleni Argyroula Tsounia, Chrysoula Moscholouri, Thomas Besios, George Paras, Alfonso Trinidad Morales, Konstantinos Chandolias
{"title":"Greek Translation and Preliminary Test-Retest Reliability of the AQUA CHILD Questionnaire in Children With Developmental Disabilities.","authors":"Stavroula Triantafyllidou, Michaela Christina Tsangala, Eleni Argyroula Tsounia, Chrysoula Moscholouri, Thomas Besios, George Paras, Alfonso Trinidad Morales, Konstantinos Chandolias","doi":"10.1002/pri.70357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>AQUA CHILD is a parent-proxy questionnaire for pre-aquatic assessment. This study describes its Greek translation and examines preliminary test-retest agreement, with explicit verification of response coding and the limits of score interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a methodological repeated-measures study, 47 parents completed the questionnaire 7 days apart. The retained electronic paired files contained 99 of the 102 numbered items on the supplied forms. Swimming responses were analysed categorically; 20 non-swimming domain summaries were analysed as exploratory raw-code sums, excluding non-applicable responses and using complete domain pairs (n = 43-47). Intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement, ICC(A, 1), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), systematic differences, measurement-error estimates, and participant-level Bland-Altman analyses were calculated. No overall score was retained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Swimming-item exact agreement was 91.5%-97.9% (unweighted kappa, 0.899-0.974). Non-swimming ICCs ranged from 0.878 to 0.968, with lower 95% CI limits of 0.786-0.942. Only undertaking a single task retained a mean retest increase after Holm adjustment: 0.22 raw-code points (95% CI, 0.09-0.34; adjusted p = 0.019). Baseline domain alpha coefficients ranged from -0.375 to 0.329. At T2, 41 non-swimming responses from 24 of 47 participants were 'not relevant', all 'not capable' at T1; none were 'not relevant' at T1. Two domain analyses used incomplete item sets. Normal-theory limits of agreement were sensitive to the discrete, zero-heavy differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These estimates describe the retained electronic records. The original paper questionnaires are no longer available, so the accuracy and origin of the 41 transitions could not be independently verified; this unresolved data-quality issue may bias reliability estimates. Unconfirmed clinical stability, incomplete adaptation records, and missing items further limit inference. The findings do not establish validated domain scales, diagnosis-specific reliability, or an overall score. Prospective validation with independent source-data verification remains necessary before individual treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"31 4","pages":"e70357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13648008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: AQUA CHILD is a parent-proxy questionnaire for pre-aquatic assessment. This study describes its Greek translation and examines preliminary test-retest agreement, with explicit verification of response coding and the limits of score interpretation.

Methods: In a methodological repeated-measures study, 47 parents completed the questionnaire 7 days apart. The retained electronic paired files contained 99 of the 102 numbered items on the supplied forms. Swimming responses were analysed categorically; 20 non-swimming domain summaries were analysed as exploratory raw-code sums, excluding non-applicable responses and using complete domain pairs (n = 43-47). Intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement, ICC(A, 1), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), systematic differences, measurement-error estimates, and participant-level Bland-Altman analyses were calculated. No overall score was retained.

Results: Swimming-item exact agreement was 91.5%-97.9% (unweighted kappa, 0.899-0.974). Non-swimming ICCs ranged from 0.878 to 0.968, with lower 95% CI limits of 0.786-0.942. Only undertaking a single task retained a mean retest increase after Holm adjustment: 0.22 raw-code points (95% CI, 0.09-0.34; adjusted p = 0.019). Baseline domain alpha coefficients ranged from -0.375 to 0.329. At T2, 41 non-swimming responses from 24 of 47 participants were 'not relevant', all 'not capable' at T1; none were 'not relevant' at T1. Two domain analyses used incomplete item sets. Normal-theory limits of agreement were sensitive to the discrete, zero-heavy differences.

Discussion: These estimates describe the retained electronic records. The original paper questionnaires are no longer available, so the accuracy and origin of the 41 transitions could not be independently verified; this unresolved data-quality issue may bias reliability estimates. Unconfirmed clinical stability, incomplete adaptation records, and missing items further limit inference. The findings do not establish validated domain scales, diagnosis-specific reliability, or an overall score. Prospective validation with independent source-data verification remains necessary before individual treatment decisions.

AQUA儿童问卷在发育障碍儿童中的希腊文翻译及初步重测信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书