Optical Flow-Derived Motion Biomarkers and Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Quantitative Assessment of Robotic Surgical Expertise.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Sergey A Shvetsov, Mahsa Kamali
{"title":"Optical Flow-Derived Motion Biomarkers and Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Quantitative Assessment of Robotic Surgical Expertise.","authors":"Sergey A Shvetsov, Mahsa Kamali","doi":"10.1177/15533506261495652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundObjective surgical skill evaluation remains challenging in robotic-assisted surgery. Existing artificial intelligence frameworks often depend on robotic telemetry or \"black-box\" deep learning models that reduce interpretability and translational accessibility.MethodsThe present study developed an interpretable computer vision framework for quantitative analysis of robotic surgical motion using dense optical flow-derived biomarkers extracted directly from surgical video recordings. Robotic suturing videos from the publicly available JIGSAWS dataset were analyzed using a Python/OpenCV-based pipeline. Quantitative motion biomarkers, including motion magnitude, temporal variability, jerk-related parameters, and smoothness indices, were extracted and evaluated across expert, intermediate, and novice surgical groups. The paired left and right stereo views were averaged to produce one feature vector for each independent trial. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Skill classification was evaluated using a class-weighted Random Forest classifier with Leave-One-User-Out cross-validation. Model predictions were interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).ResultsOptical flow analysis successfully extracted reproducible motion biomarkers associated with surgical expertise. Significant differences were observed in mean motion magnitude (<i>P</i> = .0035), mean absolute jerk (<i>P</i> = .00074), and the unnormalized smoothness index (<i>P</i> = .00074). Motion variability did not differ significantly among the groups after trial-level aggregation (<i>P</i> = .0769). SPARC showed the expected ordering of normalized smoothness, with the highest values among experts, but the group difference was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .0647). Principal component analysis demonstrated partial clustering of surgical expertise groups based on extracted motion dynamics. Under Leave-One-User-Out cross-validation, the Random Forest classifier achieved an overall accuracy of 38.5%, a balanced accuracy of 29.5%, a macro-average AUC of 0.401, and a weighted-average AUC of 0.430. Genuine out-of-fold SHAP analysis identified the smoothness index, mean absolute jerk, and mean absolute acceleration as the largest contributors to the model outputs.ConclusionsOptical flow-derived motion biomarkers provide an interpretable characterization of robotic surgical movement directly from video recordings without requiring robotic telemetry. However, the modest performance under user-independent validation indicates that these biomarkers should not yet be used as a standalone measure of surgical expertise. The proposed framework provides a transparent basis for developing and externally validating video-based surgical skill assessment methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506261495652"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506261495652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundObjective surgical skill evaluation remains challenging in robotic-assisted surgery. Existing artificial intelligence frameworks often depend on robotic telemetry or "black-box" deep learning models that reduce interpretability and translational accessibility.MethodsThe present study developed an interpretable computer vision framework for quantitative analysis of robotic surgical motion using dense optical flow-derived biomarkers extracted directly from surgical video recordings. Robotic suturing videos from the publicly available JIGSAWS dataset were analyzed using a Python/OpenCV-based pipeline. Quantitative motion biomarkers, including motion magnitude, temporal variability, jerk-related parameters, and smoothness indices, were extracted and evaluated across expert, intermediate, and novice surgical groups. The paired left and right stereo views were averaged to produce one feature vector for each independent trial. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Skill classification was evaluated using a class-weighted Random Forest classifier with Leave-One-User-Out cross-validation. Model predictions were interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).ResultsOptical flow analysis successfully extracted reproducible motion biomarkers associated with surgical expertise. Significant differences were observed in mean motion magnitude (P = .0035), mean absolute jerk (P = .00074), and the unnormalized smoothness index (P = .00074). Motion variability did not differ significantly among the groups after trial-level aggregation (P = .0769). SPARC showed the expected ordering of normalized smoothness, with the highest values among experts, but the group difference was not statistically significant (P = .0647). Principal component analysis demonstrated partial clustering of surgical expertise groups based on extracted motion dynamics. Under Leave-One-User-Out cross-validation, the Random Forest classifier achieved an overall accuracy of 38.5%, a balanced accuracy of 29.5%, a macro-average AUC of 0.401, and a weighted-average AUC of 0.430. Genuine out-of-fold SHAP analysis identified the smoothness index, mean absolute jerk, and mean absolute acceleration as the largest contributors to the model outputs.ConclusionsOptical flow-derived motion biomarkers provide an interpretable characterization of robotic surgical movement directly from video recordings without requiring robotic telemetry. However, the modest performance under user-independent validation indicates that these biomarkers should not yet be used as a standalone measure of surgical expertise. The proposed framework provides a transparent basis for developing and externally validating video-based surgical skill assessment methods.

光流衍生的运动生物标志物和可解释的人工智能用于机器人外科专业知识的定量评估。
背景:在机器人辅助手术中,手术技能评估仍然具有挑战性。现有的人工智能框架通常依赖于机器人遥测或“黑箱”深度学习模型,这些模型降低了可解释性和可翻译性。方法本研究开发了一个可解释的计算机视觉框架,用于定量分析机器人手术运动,使用直接从手术录像中提取的密集光流衍生的生物标志物。使用基于Python/ opencv的管道分析来自公开可用的JIGSAWS数据集的机器人缝合视频。定量运动生物标志物,包括运动幅度、时间变异性、抽搐相关参数和平滑度指数,被提取并在专家、中级和新手手术组中进行评估。对配对的左右立体视图进行平均,为每个独立试验生成一个特征向量。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学比较。技能分类使用类加权随机森林分类器进行评估,并使用Leave-One-User-Out交叉验证。模型预测采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)进行解释。结果光流分析成功提取了与外科专业知识相关的可重复运动生物标志物。在平均运动幅度(P = 0.0035)、平均绝对抖动(P = 0.00074)和非归一化平滑指数(P = 0.00074)上观察到显著差异。运动变异性在试验水平聚合后各组间无显著差异(P = .0769)。SPARC显示归一化平滑度的期望排序,专家之间的值最高,但组间差异无统计学意义(P = .0647)。主成分分析显示了基于提取的运动动力学的外科专科组的部分聚类。在Leave-One-User-Out交叉验证下,Random Forest分类器的总体准确率为38.5%,平衡准确率为29.5%,宏观平均AUC为0.401,加权平均AUC为0.430。真正的out- fold SHAP分析确定了平滑指数、平均绝对抖动和平均绝对加速度是模型输出的最大贡献者。光流衍生的运动生物标志物提供了机器人手术运动的可解释特征,直接从视频记录,而不需要机器人遥测。然而,在用户独立验证下的适度表现表明,这些生物标志物尚不应作为外科专业知识的独立衡量标准。所提出的框架为开发和外部验证基于视频的手术技能评估方法提供了透明的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书