Automated surgical phase recognition in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication using deep learning: a retrospective video-based study.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yohei Sanmoto, Luning Li, Yudai Goto, Xin Zhu, Kouji Masumoto
{"title":"Automated surgical phase recognition in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication using deep learning: a retrospective video-based study.","authors":"Yohei Sanmoto, Luning Li, Yudai Goto, Xin Zhu, Kouji Masumoto","doi":"10.1007/s00464-026-13437-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Automated surgical phase recognition may support objective workflow analysis and surgical education but has not been sufficiently evaluated in pediatric minimally invasive surgery. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based phase recognition model for pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 38 laparoscopic fundoplication videos recorded between 2015 and 2025. Videos were annotated at 1-s intervals using a predefined 10-phase workflow. Heterogeneous nonstandard intra-abdominal intervals were excluded before model training and evaluation, resulting in a nine-phase classification framework. A phase recognition model combining a frozen Vision Transformer backbone with a bidirectional gated recurrent unit network was trained using cross-entropy and temporal smoothing losses and evaluated by case-level 5-fold cross-validation with three random seeds per fold. Overall and phase-specific classification performance, misclassification patterns, and correlations and absolute differences between predicted and reference phase durations were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the eight surgical phases, mean accuracy, macro-F1 score, and macro-Jaccard index were 0.812 ± 0.030, 0.805 ± 0.030, and 0.682 ± 0.042, respectively. Phase-specific mean recall ranged from 0.674 to 0.902 and was lowest for the shoulder stitch phase (0.674 ± 0.135). Predicted timelines generally reflected the overall operative workflow, with misclassifications occurring predominantly between temporally or procedurally adjacent phases. Predicted and reference phase durations showed moderate to very strong correlations across phases (Spearman's ρ, 0.469-0.937), with the lowest correlation observed for hiatal closure (ρ = 0.469); hiatal closure and wrap formation also had the largest median absolute errors (5.0 min each).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated phase recognition in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication videos achieved promising classification performance, although discrimination between visually similar adjacent phases and case-level phase duration estimation require further improvement. These findings establish an initial benchmark for pediatric surgical video analysis and support further investigation of its applications in operative review, surgical education, and structured performance assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13437-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Automated surgical phase recognition may support objective workflow analysis and surgical education but has not been sufficiently evaluated in pediatric minimally invasive surgery. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based phase recognition model for pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 38 laparoscopic fundoplication videos recorded between 2015 and 2025. Videos were annotated at 1-s intervals using a predefined 10-phase workflow. Heterogeneous nonstandard intra-abdominal intervals were excluded before model training and evaluation, resulting in a nine-phase classification framework. A phase recognition model combining a frozen Vision Transformer backbone with a bidirectional gated recurrent unit network was trained using cross-entropy and temporal smoothing losses and evaluated by case-level 5-fold cross-validation with three random seeds per fold. Overall and phase-specific classification performance, misclassification patterns, and correlations and absolute differences between predicted and reference phase durations were assessed.

Results: Across the eight surgical phases, mean accuracy, macro-F1 score, and macro-Jaccard index were 0.812 ± 0.030, 0.805 ± 0.030, and 0.682 ± 0.042, respectively. Phase-specific mean recall ranged from 0.674 to 0.902 and was lowest for the shoulder stitch phase (0.674 ± 0.135). Predicted timelines generally reflected the overall operative workflow, with misclassifications occurring predominantly between temporally or procedurally adjacent phases. Predicted and reference phase durations showed moderate to very strong correlations across phases (Spearman's ρ, 0.469-0.937), with the lowest correlation observed for hiatal closure (ρ = 0.469); hiatal closure and wrap formation also had the largest median absolute errors (5.0 min each).

Conclusions: Automated phase recognition in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication videos achieved promising classification performance, although discrimination between visually similar adjacent phases and case-level phase duration estimation require further improvement. These findings establish an initial benchmark for pediatric surgical video analysis and support further investigation of its applications in operative review, surgical education, and structured performance assessment.

应用深度学习的儿童腹腔镜下手术阶段自动识别:基于视频的回顾性研究。
背景:自动手术阶段识别可以支持客观的工作流程分析和外科教育,但在儿科微创手术中尚未得到充分的评估。本研究旨在开发和评估一种基于深度学习的阶段识别模型,用于儿童腹腔镜手术。方法回顾性分析2015 - 2025年间拍摄的38段腹腔镜下翻底视频。使用预定义的10阶段工作流程,每隔1- 5秒对视频进行注释。在模型训练和评估之前,排除异质非标准腹内间隔,形成一个九阶段分类框架。结合冻结Vision Transformer主干和双向门控循环单元网络的相位识别模型使用交叉熵和时间平滑损失进行训练,并通过案例级5倍交叉验证(每倍3个随机种子)进行评估。评估了总体和特定阶段的分类性能、错误分类模式以及预测和参考阶段持续时间之间的相关性和绝对差异。结果:8个手术期的平均准确率为0.812±0.030,macro-F1评分为0.805±0.030,macro-Jaccard指数为0.682±0.042。阶段特异性平均召回率为0.674 ~ 0.902,肩针阶段最低(0.674±0.135)。预测的时间表通常反映了整个操作工作流程,错误分类主要发生在时间或程序相邻阶段之间。预测相持续时间和参考相持续时间在各相间表现出中等至非常强的相关性(Spearman's ρ, 0.469-0.937),裂孔闭合的相关性最低(ρ = 0.469);裂孔闭合和包裹形成的中位绝对误差也最大(各5.0 min)。结论:儿童腹腔镜下翻底视频的自动相位识别取得了很好的分类效果,尽管视觉上相似的相邻相位的区分和病例级相位持续时间估计有待进一步改进。这些发现为儿科手术视频分析建立了初步的基准,并支持进一步研究其在手术回顾、外科教育和结构化绩效评估中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书