[Personal Health Budget as a modulator in the mobilization of primary social networks: the Lombardy Region's experiment at the ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo in Milan.]

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Benedetta Riva, Serena Ferrario, Sarah Candotti, Alessandro Grecchi, Paolo Miragoli, Armando D'Agostino
{"title":"[Personal Health Budget as a modulator in the mobilization of primary social networks: the Lombardy Region's experiment at the ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo in Milan.]","authors":"Benedetta Riva, Serena Ferrario, Sarah Candotti, Alessandro Grecchi, Paolo Miragoli, Armando D'Agostino","doi":"10.1708/4785.48117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates how interventions based on Personal Health Budget (PHB), a social and health integration tool for users with complex needs, contribute to the modulation and expansion of social networks in patients with severe mental disorders, counteracting social isolation associated with unfavorable prognostic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective observational study enrolled 24 subjects diagnosed with severe mental disorder, who were included in the PHB to prevent institutionalization. The sample included patients discharged from a protected community and users from their homes referred by local services. Social networks were assessed using a custom-designed questionnaire, derived from validated instruments, to quantitatively measure network size combined with Todd's Map. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 months, 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increase in the size of participants' social networks and in the frequency of both phone and face-to-face contacts was observed, particularly within the local community and in relationships with community peers, cohabitants, and work colleagues. The increase was found in over 49% of cases, at both 3 and 6 months. No statistically significant differences were observed across subgroup of origin.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The results of the study suggest that PHB is an effective intervention model for expanding and diversifying the social networks of individuals with severe mental disorders. The tailored approach and integration and collaboration with the community and the third sector were crucial in promoting inclusion and recovery processes. Longitudinal studies with larger samples are needed to confirm the stability of these effects over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":21506,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di psichiatria","volume":"61 5","pages":"226-235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1708/4785.48117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates how interventions based on Personal Health Budget (PHB), a social and health integration tool for users with complex needs, contribute to the modulation and expansion of social networks in patients with severe mental disorders, counteracting social isolation associated with unfavorable prognostic outcomes.

Methods: The prospective observational study enrolled 24 subjects diagnosed with severe mental disorder, who were included in the PHB to prevent institutionalization. The sample included patients discharged from a protected community and users from their homes referred by local services. Social networks were assessed using a custom-designed questionnaire, derived from validated instruments, to quantitatively measure network size combined with Todd's Map. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 months, 6 months.

Results: An increase in the size of participants' social networks and in the frequency of both phone and face-to-face contacts was observed, particularly within the local community and in relationships with community peers, cohabitants, and work colleagues. The increase was found in over 49% of cases, at both 3 and 6 months. No statistically significant differences were observed across subgroup of origin.

Discussion and conclusions: The results of the study suggest that PHB is an effective intervention model for expanding and diversifying the social networks of individuals with severe mental disorders. The tailored approach and integration and collaboration with the community and the third sector were crucial in promoting inclusion and recovery processes. Longitudinal studies with larger samples are needed to confirm the stability of these effects over time.

[个人健康预算在初级社会网络动员中的调节作用:伦巴第地区在米兰圣保罗卡洛助理医院的实验]
目的:本研究评估基于个人健康预算(PHB)的干预措施如何有助于调节和扩展严重精神障碍患者的社会网络,抵消与不良预后相关的社会隔离。PHB是一种针对复杂需求用户的社会和健康整合工具。方法:前瞻性观察性研究纳入24例诊断为严重精神障碍的受试者,将其纳入PHB以预防机构化。样本包括从受保护社区出院的患者和由当地服务机构转诊的从家中出院的用户。社会网络评估使用定制设计的问卷,从有效的工具,定量测量网络规模结合托德的地图。在基线、3个月、6个月时进行评估。结果:观察到参与者的社会网络规模和电话和面对面接触的频率都有所增加,特别是在当地社区内以及与社区同伴、同居者和工作同事的关系中。在3个月和6个月时,发现超过49%的病例增加。不同亚组间的差异无统计学意义。讨论与结论:研究结果表明,PHB是一种有效的干预模式,可以扩大和多样化重度精神障碍患者的社会网络。量身定制的方法以及与社区和第三部门的整合和协作对于促进包容和恢复进程至关重要。需要更大样本的纵向研究来证实这些影响随时间的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rivista di psichiatria
Rivista di psichiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gli interessi della rivista riguardano l’approfondimento delle interazioni tra mente e malattia, la validazione e la discussione dei nuovi strumenti e parametri di classificazione diagnostica, la verifica delle prospettive terapeutiche farmacologiche e non.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书