Multi-criteria proton treatment planning incorporating spot boosting for prompt gammain-vivorange verification.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mara Schubert, Ze Huang, Marco Pinto, Christian Thieke, Karl-Heinz Küfer, Katrin Teichert, Katia Parodi
{"title":"Multi-criteria proton treatment planning incorporating spot boosting for prompt gamma<i>in-vivo</i>range verification.","authors":"Mara Schubert, Ze Huang, Marco Pinto, Christian Thieke, Karl-Heinz Küfer, Katrin Teichert, Katia Parodi","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/aeb223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Prompt gamma (PG) detection enables beam range verification and margin reduction in proton therapy, but its effectiveness is limited by counting statistics. Spot boosting has been proposed to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio by increasing the number of protons in selected spots of a pencil beam scanning treatment plan. This work integrates PG monitoring into an multi-criteria optimization (MCO) framework to investigate trade-offs between proton counts in boosted spots and dosimetric metrics.<i>Approach.</i>Intensity modulated proton therapy plans for a prostate-tumor and a brain-tumor patient were optimized in OpenTPS. Dose, LET weighted dose (LETxdose) and PG distributions were simulated for each pencil beam using the fast Monte Carlo (MC) engine MCSquare. For each field, ten candidate spots were selected based on three metrics quantifying the quality of PG monitoring and an even spatial distribution across the clinical target volume. Initial pencil beam weights and corresponding dose and LETxdose distributions were imported into an MCO framework for re-optimization, simultaneously considering both dosimetric goals and boosting objectives.<i>Main results.</i>Boosting up toprotons/spot maintained the plan quality without violating constraints in the prostate case. In the brain case, spot boosting required moderate deviations from the initial target dose constraints. For both cases, only minor boosting gains were obtained by relaxing dose metrics for organs at risk.<i>Significance.</i>This study is the first to visualize spot boosting trade-offs via Pareto fronts to support an informed decision, integrating verification quality aspects into the treatment planning stage. The approach enables selection of plans that preserve dose and LETxdose objectives while enhancing PG signal in targeted spots for reliable<i>in-vivo</i>range verification. The framework is broadly applicable and can provide a strategy for embedding verification-driven objectives into treatment optimization beyond PG monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aeb223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Prompt gamma (PG) detection enables beam range verification and margin reduction in proton therapy, but its effectiveness is limited by counting statistics. Spot boosting has been proposed to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio by increasing the number of protons in selected spots of a pencil beam scanning treatment plan. This work integrates PG monitoring into an multi-criteria optimization (MCO) framework to investigate trade-offs between proton counts in boosted spots and dosimetric metrics.Approach.Intensity modulated proton therapy plans for a prostate-tumor and a brain-tumor patient were optimized in OpenTPS. Dose, LET weighted dose (LETxdose) and PG distributions were simulated for each pencil beam using the fast Monte Carlo (MC) engine MCSquare. For each field, ten candidate spots were selected based on three metrics quantifying the quality of PG monitoring and an even spatial distribution across the clinical target volume. Initial pencil beam weights and corresponding dose and LETxdose distributions were imported into an MCO framework for re-optimization, simultaneously considering both dosimetric goals and boosting objectives.Main results.Boosting up toprotons/spot maintained the plan quality without violating constraints in the prostate case. In the brain case, spot boosting required moderate deviations from the initial target dose constraints. For both cases, only minor boosting gains were obtained by relaxing dose metrics for organs at risk.Significance.This study is the first to visualize spot boosting trade-offs via Pareto fronts to support an informed decision, integrating verification quality aspects into the treatment planning stage. The approach enables selection of plans that preserve dose and LETxdose objectives while enhancing PG signal in targeted spots for reliablein-vivorange verification. The framework is broadly applicable and can provide a strategy for embedding verification-driven objectives into treatment optimization beyond PG monitoring.

多标准质子治疗计划,包括现场增强,以及时伽马体内范围验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书