Translating and Validating a Hindi Version of the Spine Functional Index: Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing in an Indian Orthopedic Population.
{"title":"Translating and Validating a Hindi Version of the Spine Functional Index: Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing in an Indian Orthopedic Population.","authors":"Sharath Raj, Deepak Kumar, Vishal Kumar, Ajay Jose, Saloni Rani Kumar, Vijay G Goni","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i10.8304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Existing Hindi patient-reported measures for spinal disorders assess the cervical and lumbar spine separately. The spine functional index (SFI) evaluates whole-spine functional limitation using 25 items, with validated Spanish, Turkish, and Chinese versions, but not Hindi. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the SFI into Hindi (SFI-Hi) and evaluate its measurement properties, including responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), in Indian patients with spinal disorders.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The SFI was translated and culturally adapted using forward-backward translation, expert review, and pilot testing. One hundred eighty-six consecutive adults with chronic (≥12 weeks) cervical, lumbar, or combined spinal disorders completed the SFI-Hi, Hindi functional rating index (FRI-Hi), Hindi SF-12, and a pain visual analog scale (VAS); cervical patients also completed the Hindi neck disability index (NDI-Hi), and lumbar patients the Hindi Oswestry disability index (ODI-Hi). Ninety stable participants repeated the SFI-Hi after 5-7 days, and 92 treated patients were reassessed at 6 weeks for responsiveness and MCID. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, construct validity, principal component analysis (PCA), responsiveness, MCID, and floor/ceiling effects were assessed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Mean SFI-Hi score was 49.0 ± 16.6 on a 0-100 disability scale. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = 0.92), and test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC2,1 = 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98), with a standard error of measurement of 2.8% and minimal detectable change of 6.5%. PCA identified a single dominant component explaining 35.0% of variance. Correlations were observed with the ODI-Hi (r = 0.64), FRI-Hi (r = 0.56), NDI-Hi (r = 0.53), VAS (r = 0.46), and SF-12 physical functioning (r = -0.54); only three of six prespecified hypotheses were confirmed. The SFI-Hi demonstrated good responsiveness (standardized response mean 0.84), with a 13.2-point improvement at 6 weeks (P < 0.001); the anchor-based MCID was 8 points (AUC 0.81). No clinically important floor or ceiling effect was observed. I was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SFI-Hi demonstrated high internal consistency, excellent test-retest reliability, good responsiveness, and a predominantly unidimensional structure in this Indian cohort, with partial support for construct validity. It is a promising whole-spine outcome measure for Hindi-speaking patients, warranting further evaluation in larger, more diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"16 10","pages":"415-422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i10.8304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Existing Hindi patient-reported measures for spinal disorders assess the cervical and lumbar spine separately. The spine functional index (SFI) evaluates whole-spine functional limitation using 25 items, with validated Spanish, Turkish, and Chinese versions, but not Hindi. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the SFI into Hindi (SFI-Hi) and evaluate its measurement properties, including responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), in Indian patients with spinal disorders.
Materials and methods: The SFI was translated and culturally adapted using forward-backward translation, expert review, and pilot testing. One hundred eighty-six consecutive adults with chronic (≥12 weeks) cervical, lumbar, or combined spinal disorders completed the SFI-Hi, Hindi functional rating index (FRI-Hi), Hindi SF-12, and a pain visual analog scale (VAS); cervical patients also completed the Hindi neck disability index (NDI-Hi), and lumbar patients the Hindi Oswestry disability index (ODI-Hi). Ninety stable participants repeated the SFI-Hi after 5-7 days, and 92 treated patients were reassessed at 6 weeks for responsiveness and MCID. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, construct validity, principal component analysis (PCA), responsiveness, MCID, and floor/ceiling effects were assessed.
Result: Mean SFI-Hi score was 49.0 ± 16.6 on a 0-100 disability scale. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = 0.92), and test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC2,1 = 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98), with a standard error of measurement of 2.8% and minimal detectable change of 6.5%. PCA identified a single dominant component explaining 35.0% of variance. Correlations were observed with the ODI-Hi (r = 0.64), FRI-Hi (r = 0.56), NDI-Hi (r = 0.53), VAS (r = 0.46), and SF-12 physical functioning (r = -0.54); only three of six prespecified hypotheses were confirmed. The SFI-Hi demonstrated good responsiveness (standardized response mean 0.84), with a 13.2-point improvement at 6 weeks (P < 0.001); the anchor-based MCID was 8 points (AUC 0.81). No clinically important floor or ceiling effect was observed. I was observed.
Conclusion: The SFI-Hi demonstrated high internal consistency, excellent test-retest reliability, good responsiveness, and a predominantly unidimensional structure in this Indian cohort, with partial support for construct validity. It is a promising whole-spine outcome measure for Hindi-speaking patients, warranting further evaluation in larger, more diverse populations.