Moving Beyond a Binary Cis-Heteronormative Perspective: A Scoping Review of Instruments for Inclusive Research into Sexual Functioning.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Alma Brand, Piet van Tuijl, Roeslan Leontjevas, Els Elaut, Mark Hommes, Jacques van Lankveld
{"title":"Moving Beyond a Binary Cis-Heteronormative Perspective: A Scoping Review of Instruments for Inclusive Research into Sexual Functioning.","authors":"Alma Brand, Piet van Tuijl, Roeslan Leontjevas, Els Elaut, Mark Hommes, Jacques van Lankveld","doi":"10.1080/0092623X.2026.2741355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cis- and heteronormativity hinder the valid measurement of sexual function in Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity (SOGD) populations. This study aimed to identify instruments designed for inclusive use and to evaluate their cross-cultural and psychometric characteristics. A scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Web of Science in April 2026. The search terms included sexual function, gender, sexual orientation, assessment instruments, and psychometric information. Screening, data extraction, and quality grading were performed independently by two reviewers. Fifteen articles described the development or validation of instruments for use among SOGD populations. Notably, non-binary individuals were included in only one study. For most instruments, adequate content and structural validity, and internal consistency were reported, but evidence for cross-gender, cross-sexual orientation, cross-cultural, criterion, and construct validity was lacking or unclear. Limited or no information was provided on test-retest reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness to changes in sexual function for the instruments used. Most identified instruments were validated in narrowly defined subgroups or assessed only a single domain of sexual functioning, limiting their suitability as general, SOGD-inclusive measures. This review supports the need to develop and validate new inclusive instruments to measure sexual function, including SOGD populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2026.2741355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cis- and heteronormativity hinder the valid measurement of sexual function in Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity (SOGD) populations. This study aimed to identify instruments designed for inclusive use and to evaluate their cross-cultural and psychometric characteristics. A scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Web of Science in April 2026. The search terms included sexual function, gender, sexual orientation, assessment instruments, and psychometric information. Screening, data extraction, and quality grading were performed independently by two reviewers. Fifteen articles described the development or validation of instruments for use among SOGD populations. Notably, non-binary individuals were included in only one study. For most instruments, adequate content and structural validity, and internal consistency were reported, but evidence for cross-gender, cross-sexual orientation, cross-cultural, criterion, and construct validity was lacking or unclear. Limited or no information was provided on test-retest reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness to changes in sexual function for the instruments used. Most identified instruments were validated in narrowly defined subgroups or assessed only a single domain of sexual functioning, limiting their suitability as general, SOGD-inclusive measures. This review supports the need to develop and validate new inclusive instruments to measure sexual function, including SOGD populations.

超越二元顺式-异性规范视角:性功能包容性研究工具的范围综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy is one of the top independent journals in the field. Under the prestigious leadership of R. Taylor Seagraves, M.D. - one of the world" foremost experts in sex and marital therapy -- JSMT is an active and contemporary forum reflecting the most viable developments emanating from the U.S. and abroad. JSMT continues to break new ground with innovative research and clinical writing, and the editor is committed to showcasing the most far-reaching traditional and contemporary thinking from all sources. You will read about therapeutic techniques, outcome, special clinical and medical problems, and the theoretical parameters of sexual functioning, and marital relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书