Combined Cerclage and Figure-of-eight Tension-band Wiring without K-wire Versus K-wire Tension Band Wiring Fixation for Transverse Patellar Fractures: A Prospective Comparative Study.

Akshay V Pawar, Mohan M Desai, Kapil A Pawar
{"title":"Combined Cerclage and Figure-of-eight Tension-band Wiring without K-wire Versus K-wire Tension Band Wiring Fixation for Transverse Patellar Fractures: A Prospective Comparative Study.","authors":"Akshay V Pawar, Mohan M Desai, Kapil A Pawar","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i10.8292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conventional modified tension-band wiring (TBW) using Kirschner wires (K-wires) is widely used for displaced transverse patellar fractures but is associated with implant prominence, irritation, migration, and breakage. K-wire-free fixation using combined cerclage and TBW may provide stable fixation while reducing hardware-related complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Prospective comparative study of 156 patients with transverse patella fracture with follow-up of at least 18 months. Group A consisted of 82 patients treated with K-wire TBW and Group B consisted of 74 patients treated with combined cerclage TBW without K-wires. Clinical assessment was done by knee range of motion, extension lag, and presence of local tenderness. Pain assessment was done using the Visual Analog Scale. Functional assessment was performed using the Bostman knee score. Radiological assessment was done using standard radiographs of the knee. Complications and implant removal were also assessed. The Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and independent-samples t-test were used to assess association. P < 0.05 was considered satistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups were comparable in demographics such as age, gender, body mass index, and follow-up period. The combined cerclage TBW without K-wires group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and less knee tenderness at 6 weeks and 3 months. Bostman scores were significantly higher at 6 months and 1 year. The pain and stair-climbing components of the Bostman score were significantly better in the combined cerclage group at 6 months and 1 year. Implant migration/breakage (2% vs. 17%) and hardware irritation (10% vs. 17%) were significantly reduced with combined cerclage TBW. Implant removal preference (16% vs. 43%) and actual removal surgery (13% vs. 31%) were also significantly lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrates that combined cerclage TBW without K-wires provides functional outcomes comparable to those of conventional modified TBW with K-wires at 1 year, while potentially reducing K-wire-related complications such as implant migration, prominence, irritation, and subsequent implant removal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"16 10","pages":"368-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i10.8292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional modified tension-band wiring (TBW) using Kirschner wires (K-wires) is widely used for displaced transverse patellar fractures but is associated with implant prominence, irritation, migration, and breakage. K-wire-free fixation using combined cerclage and TBW may provide stable fixation while reducing hardware-related complications.

Materials and methods: Prospective comparative study of 156 patients with transverse patella fracture with follow-up of at least 18 months. Group A consisted of 82 patients treated with K-wire TBW and Group B consisted of 74 patients treated with combined cerclage TBW without K-wires. Clinical assessment was done by knee range of motion, extension lag, and presence of local tenderness. Pain assessment was done using the Visual Analog Scale. Functional assessment was performed using the Bostman knee score. Radiological assessment was done using standard radiographs of the knee. Complications and implant removal were also assessed. The Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and independent-samples t-test were used to assess association. P < 0.05 was considered satistically significant.

Results: Both groups were comparable in demographics such as age, gender, body mass index, and follow-up period. The combined cerclage TBW without K-wires group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and less knee tenderness at 6 weeks and 3 months. Bostman scores were significantly higher at 6 months and 1 year. The pain and stair-climbing components of the Bostman score were significantly better in the combined cerclage group at 6 months and 1 year. Implant migration/breakage (2% vs. 17%) and hardware irritation (10% vs. 17%) were significantly reduced with combined cerclage TBW. Implant removal preference (16% vs. 43%) and actual removal surgery (13% vs. 31%) were also significantly lower.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates that combined cerclage TBW without K-wires provides functional outcomes comparable to those of conventional modified TBW with K-wires at 1 year, while potentially reducing K-wire-related complications such as implant migration, prominence, irritation, and subsequent implant removal surgery.

联合环扎术和不带k -丝张力带钢丝与不带k -丝张力带钢丝固定髌骨横向骨折的前瞻性比较研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书