Extravasation of vesicant drugs in combined regimens: A case with a fatal outcome.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Mercedes Jiménez-Heredia, Gisela Riu-Viladoms, Esther Carcelero-San Martín, Ines Monge-Escartín, Begoña Gómez-Pérez
{"title":"Extravasation of vesicant drugs in combined regimens: A case with a fatal outcome.","authors":"Mercedes Jiménez-Heredia, Gisela Riu-Viladoms, Esther Carcelero-San Martín, Ines Monge-Escartín, Begoña Gómez-Pérez","doi":"10.1177/10781552261494204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionExtravasation of vesicant chemotherapy is an oncological emergency that may result in severe tissue injury, functional impairment, and long-term morbidity. Management becomes particularly challenging in combination regimens containing agents with different vesicant properties and opposing treatment recommendations.Case ReportWe report a fatal case associated with administration of a combination chemotherapy regimen through difficult peripheral venous access. Mild symptoms during infusion of a non-vesicant agent led to suspected extravasation; consequently, antidotes were not administered. The patient was initially discharged without clinical signs of injury. However, subsequent presentation revealed severe local damage attributed to extravasation of vesicant agents within the regimen.Management & OutcomeClinical assessment suggested injury secondary to extravasation of vesicant agents previously administered within the regimen, most likely doxorubicin and/or vincristine. Despite hospital admission and multidisciplinary management involving haematology, dermatology, and plastic surgery teams, the lesion progressively deteriorated. The patient died from the resulting complications.DiscussionThis case highlights key challenges in combined chemotherapy regimens, where identification of the causative agent may be uncertain and management strategies differ substantially. It underscores the importance of appropriate vascular access in high-risk patients, early suspicion of vesicant involvement regardless of infusion sequence, and adherence to updated guidelines. Strengthening institutional protocols and decision-support tools is essential to prevent catastrophic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552261494204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552261494204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionExtravasation of vesicant chemotherapy is an oncological emergency that may result in severe tissue injury, functional impairment, and long-term morbidity. Management becomes particularly challenging in combination regimens containing agents with different vesicant properties and opposing treatment recommendations.Case ReportWe report a fatal case associated with administration of a combination chemotherapy regimen through difficult peripheral venous access. Mild symptoms during infusion of a non-vesicant agent led to suspected extravasation; consequently, antidotes were not administered. The patient was initially discharged without clinical signs of injury. However, subsequent presentation revealed severe local damage attributed to extravasation of vesicant agents within the regimen.Management & OutcomeClinical assessment suggested injury secondary to extravasation of vesicant agents previously administered within the regimen, most likely doxorubicin and/or vincristine. Despite hospital admission and multidisciplinary management involving haematology, dermatology, and plastic surgery teams, the lesion progressively deteriorated. The patient died from the resulting complications.DiscussionThis case highlights key challenges in combined chemotherapy regimens, where identification of the causative agent may be uncertain and management strategies differ substantially. It underscores the importance of appropriate vascular access in high-risk patients, early suspicion of vesicant involvement regardless of infusion sequence, and adherence to updated guidelines. Strengthening institutional protocols and decision-support tools is essential to prevent catastrophic outcomes.

联合治疗方案中泡腾剂药物外渗:1例致死性结局。
白泡性化疗药物外渗是一种肿瘤急症,可能导致严重的组织损伤、功能损害和长期发病率。在含有不同发泡剂特性和相反治疗建议的药物的联合治疗方案中,管理变得特别具有挑战性。病例报告我们报告了一个致命的病例与通过困难的外周静脉通道的联合化疗方案的管理。在输注非泡腾剂期间出现轻微症状,导致怀疑外渗;因此,没有使用解毒剂。患者出院时无临床损伤症状。然而,随后的报告显示,在治疗方案中,由于发泡剂外渗造成了严重的局部损伤。处理和结果:临床评估表明,损伤继发于先前在该方案中使用的泡泡剂外渗,最可能是阿霉素和/或长春新碱。尽管接受了包括血液学、皮肤科和整形外科团队在内的多学科治疗,病变仍逐渐恶化。病人死于由此产生的并发症。本病例强调了联合化疗方案的关键挑战,其中病原体的识别可能不确定,管理策略也存在很大差异。它强调了高危患者适当的血管通路的重要性,无论输注顺序如何,早期怀疑膀胱浸润,并遵守更新的指南。加强机构协议和决策支持工具对于防止灾难性后果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书