{"title":"Validation of the Up7-ALBI Score for Prognostication in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab.","authors":"Chien-Hung Lu, Wei-Yu Kao, Yao-Yu Hsieh, Chia-Chi Wang, Ming-Shun Wu, Chih-Horng Wu, Tsung-Hao Liu, Wei-Yi Ting, Shan-Chia Wu, Kai-I Chuang, Chien-Wei Su, Chun-Chao Chang, San-Chi Chen","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S638385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A well-established prognostic scoring system for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving systemic therapy is lacking. The Up7-ALBI score has shown prognostic value for lenvatinib. This study aimed to validate its prognostic value in uHCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo-bev).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter study included 225 patients with uHCC who received first-line atezo-bev in Taiwan between 2017 and 2025. The Up7-ALBI score (0-2), combining tumor burden (within vs beyond up-to-7) and ALBI grade (1 vs 2-3), categorized patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The score was used to stratify progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with multivariate Cox analysis performed. Prognostic performance was compared with previously reported scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were 44.4% and 60.4%, respectively, and the median PFS and OS were 7.0 and 23.8 months. Among the 225 enrolled patients, 178 patients had complete data for Up7-ALBI analysis. The Up7-ALBI score significantly stratified outcomes, with median OS not reached, 36.0 months, and 9.2 months for scores 0, 1, and 2 (p < 0.01); median PFS of 13.4, 7.9, and 5.8 months (p < 0.01); and ORR of 66.7%, 52.2%, and 32.9%, respectively (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that Up7-ALBI scores 1 and 2, along with macrovascular invasion, were independent risk factors for OS. The Up7-ALBI score demonstrated the lowest Akaike information criterion (484.3) among the previously proposed scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study validated the Up7-ALBI score for uHCC receiving atezo-bev. Its consistent prognostic performance across systemic therapies supports its potential as a simple, clinically applicable risk-stratification tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"13 ","pages":"638385"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13644561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S638385","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: A well-established prognostic scoring system for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving systemic therapy is lacking. The Up7-ALBI score has shown prognostic value for lenvatinib. This study aimed to validate its prognostic value in uHCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo-bev).
Patients and methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 225 patients with uHCC who received first-line atezo-bev in Taiwan between 2017 and 2025. The Up7-ALBI score (0-2), combining tumor burden (within vs beyond up-to-7) and ALBI grade (1 vs 2-3), categorized patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The score was used to stratify progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with multivariate Cox analysis performed. Prognostic performance was compared with previously reported scoring systems.
Results: The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were 44.4% and 60.4%, respectively, and the median PFS and OS were 7.0 and 23.8 months. Among the 225 enrolled patients, 178 patients had complete data for Up7-ALBI analysis. The Up7-ALBI score significantly stratified outcomes, with median OS not reached, 36.0 months, and 9.2 months for scores 0, 1, and 2 (p < 0.01); median PFS of 13.4, 7.9, and 5.8 months (p < 0.01); and ORR of 66.7%, 52.2%, and 32.9%, respectively (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that Up7-ALBI scores 1 and 2, along with macrovascular invasion, were independent risk factors for OS. The Up7-ALBI score demonstrated the lowest Akaike information criterion (484.3) among the previously proposed scores.
Conclusion: This study validated the Up7-ALBI score for uHCC receiving atezo-bev. Its consistent prognostic performance across systemic therapies supports its potential as a simple, clinically applicable risk-stratification tool.