{"title":"Intraoperative Discovery of Incorrect Femoral Component Packaging during Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Near-Miss Case Report.","authors":"Tsuneari Takahashi, Takumi Matsumoto","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i10.8240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Incorrect implant delivery during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rare but represents a potential patient safety risk. Implant discrepancies may remain undetected until intraoperative opening despite correct external labeling.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 76-year-old woman with bilateral varus knee osteoarthritis underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA using a medial pivot system planned with computed tomography-based patient-specific instrumentation. Cementless fixation was intended for both knees. The left knee was implanted uneventfully. During right TKA, a femoral component with correct external labeling was opened; however, the implant inside was a cemented component, one size larger than planned, and intended for the contralateral side. An appropriately sized backup component was available, allowing completion of surgery without interruption. At 1 year, range of motion improved from -5°-110° to 0°-120° on the left and from -10°-114° to 0°-125° on the right. Pain on the visual analog scale improved from 67 to 0, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score improved from 56.1 to 90.6.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This intraoperative implant packaging discrepancy represents a near-miss event. Even with correct external labeling and meticulous pre-operative planning, implant mismatch may occur. Intraoperative verification and immediate availability of appropriate backup implants are essential to prevent patient harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"16 10","pages":"215-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i10.8240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Incorrect implant delivery during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rare but represents a potential patient safety risk. Implant discrepancies may remain undetected until intraoperative opening despite correct external labeling.
Case report: A 76-year-old woman with bilateral varus knee osteoarthritis underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA using a medial pivot system planned with computed tomography-based patient-specific instrumentation. Cementless fixation was intended for both knees. The left knee was implanted uneventfully. During right TKA, a femoral component with correct external labeling was opened; however, the implant inside was a cemented component, one size larger than planned, and intended for the contralateral side. An appropriately sized backup component was available, allowing completion of surgery without interruption. At 1 year, range of motion improved from -5°-110° to 0°-120° on the left and from -10°-114° to 0°-125° on the right. Pain on the visual analog scale improved from 67 to 0, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score improved from 56.1 to 90.6.
Conclusion: This intraoperative implant packaging discrepancy represents a near-miss event. Even with correct external labeling and meticulous pre-operative planning, implant mismatch may occur. Intraoperative verification and immediate availability of appropriate backup implants are essential to prevent patient harm.