Efficacy of Transforaminal Nerve Root Block for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Vipin Kumar Mishra, Jeetesh Gawande, Saumya Mishra
{"title":"Efficacy of Transforaminal Nerve Root Block for Lumbar Disc Herniation.","authors":"Vipin Kumar Mishra, Jeetesh Gawande, Saumya Mishra","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i10.8350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lumbar disc herniation is a common cause of monoradicular pain, often managed conservatively. For patients unresponsive to non-operative measures, transforaminal selective nerve root block (SNRB) offers a minimally invasive alternative aimed at reducing inflammation and pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of SNRB in patients with monoradicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation and to assess its role in reducing surgical intervention rates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted on 120 patients with acute (<6 weeks) unilateral radicular pain and magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed single-level disc herniation. Under fluoroscopic guidance, 2 mL methylprednisolone acetate and 5 mL lignocaine were injected at the affected root. Pain relief was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 2 weeks and 6 months. Patients with persistent symptoms were offered a repeat block or microdiscectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 2 weeks, 60 patients (Group 1) achieved good pain relief (VAS < 3), 40 had partial relief (Group 2), and 20 had poor relief (Group 3). At 6 months, 36 of Group 1 maintained satisfactory relief, while 24 experienced recurrence (15 required a repeat block, 9 underwent surgery). In Group 2, 20 improved with conservative care, eight required a repeat block, and 12 underwent surgery. In Group 3, 12 underwent surgery and eight received a repeat block, of which two maintained relief. Early VAS response predicted long-term outcomes and guided further management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SNRB is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive option for lumbar disc herniation-related radicular pain, providing meaningful pain relief and delaying or reducing the need for surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"16 10","pages":"606-610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i10.8350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar disc herniation is a common cause of monoradicular pain, often managed conservatively. For patients unresponsive to non-operative measures, transforaminal selective nerve root block (SNRB) offers a minimally invasive alternative aimed at reducing inflammation and pain.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of SNRB in patients with monoradicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation and to assess its role in reducing surgical intervention rates.

Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted on 120 patients with acute (<6 weeks) unilateral radicular pain and magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed single-level disc herniation. Under fluoroscopic guidance, 2 mL methylprednisolone acetate and 5 mL lignocaine were injected at the affected root. Pain relief was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 2 weeks and 6 months. Patients with persistent symptoms were offered a repeat block or microdiscectomy.

Results: At 2 weeks, 60 patients (Group 1) achieved good pain relief (VAS < 3), 40 had partial relief (Group 2), and 20 had poor relief (Group 3). At 6 months, 36 of Group 1 maintained satisfactory relief, while 24 experienced recurrence (15 required a repeat block, 9 underwent surgery). In Group 2, 20 improved with conservative care, eight required a repeat block, and 12 underwent surgery. In Group 3, 12 underwent surgery and eight received a repeat block, of which two maintained relief. Early VAS response predicted long-term outcomes and guided further management.

Conclusion: SNRB is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive option for lumbar disc herniation-related radicular pain, providing meaningful pain relief and delaying or reducing the need for surgery.

经椎间孔神经根阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。
腰椎间盘突出是单根性疼痛的常见原因,通常采用保守治疗。对于对非手术措施无反应的患者,经椎间孔选择性神经根阻滞(SNRB)提供了一种旨在减轻炎症和疼痛的微创替代方法。目的:本研究的目的是评估SNRB在腰椎间盘突出症单根性疼痛患者中的疗效,并评估其在降低手术干预率方面的作用。材料与方法:对120例急性疼痛患者进行前瞻性研究。结果:2周时,60例患者(1组)疼痛缓解良好(VAS < 3), 40例患者缓解部分(2组),20例患者缓解较差(3组)。6个月时,第一组36例患者维持满意缓解,24例复发(15例需要再次阻断,9例手术)。在第2组中,20例经保守治疗改善,8例需要重复阻滞,12例接受手术。在第3组,12人接受手术,8人接受重复阻滞,其中2人维持缓解。早期VAS反应可预测长期预后并指导进一步治疗。结论:SNRB是治疗腰椎间盘突出相关神经根性疼痛的一种有效、安全、微创的选择,可有效缓解疼痛,延迟或减少手术的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书