Respiratory function, functional capacity, dyspnea, and sleep quality in young adults using the IQOS heated tobacco product: a matched cross-sectional study.
{"title":"Respiratory function, functional capacity, dyspnea, and sleep quality in young adults using the IQOS heated tobacco product: a matched cross-sectional study.","authors":"Rıdvan Aktan, Görkem Çetin, Göknil Tekinöz, Emre Halden","doi":"10.1007/s11739-026-04554-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This matched cross-sectional study compared respiratory function, respiratory muscle strength, functional exercise capacity, dyspnea, and sleep quality between young IQOS users and matched control subjects. This study involved 31 young adult IQOS users and 31 age/sex/body mass index-matched never-tobacco users who underwent a standardized testing protocol during a single visit. Spirometry, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), 6-min walk test (6MWT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, modified Borg Scale (mBorg), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores were compared. While mean resting lung functions were similar between groups (all p > 0.05), IQOS users had shorter 6MWT distances (591.1 [580.2 - 638.4] meters vs. 626.0 [600.5 - 683.8] meters, p = 0.003, r = 0.53) and higher mMRC dyspnea scores (median mMRC Grade = 1 (0-1) in IQOS users vs 0 (0-0) in controls, p < 0.001, r = 0.62), higher mBorg dyspnea scores at the end of the 6MWT (median end-6MWT mBorg rating scale 1 [0-2] vs 0 [0-1], p = 0.001, r = 0.57), and poor sleep quality (PSQI global score 6.32 ± 2.63 vs 4.58 ± 1.61, p = 0.012, r = 0.45). Additionally, while MIP values tended toward being lower in IQOS users, these differences were statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.090). In conclusion, young exclusive IQOS users showed lower functional exercise capacity, greater dyspnea, and poorer sleep quality than matched never-users despite comparable resting spirometry, and these hypothesis-generating findings warrant longitudinal evaluation with biochemical exposure verification.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-026-04554-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This matched cross-sectional study compared respiratory function, respiratory muscle strength, functional exercise capacity, dyspnea, and sleep quality between young IQOS users and matched control subjects. This study involved 31 young adult IQOS users and 31 age/sex/body mass index-matched never-tobacco users who underwent a standardized testing protocol during a single visit. Spirometry, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), 6-min walk test (6MWT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, modified Borg Scale (mBorg), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores were compared. While mean resting lung functions were similar between groups (all p > 0.05), IQOS users had shorter 6MWT distances (591.1 [580.2 - 638.4] meters vs. 626.0 [600.5 - 683.8] meters, p = 0.003, r = 0.53) and higher mMRC dyspnea scores (median mMRC Grade = 1 (0-1) in IQOS users vs 0 (0-0) in controls, p < 0.001, r = 0.62), higher mBorg dyspnea scores at the end of the 6MWT (median end-6MWT mBorg rating scale 1 [0-2] vs 0 [0-1], p = 0.001, r = 0.57), and poor sleep quality (PSQI global score 6.32 ± 2.63 vs 4.58 ± 1.61, p = 0.012, r = 0.45). Additionally, while MIP values tended toward being lower in IQOS users, these differences were statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.090). In conclusion, young exclusive IQOS users showed lower functional exercise capacity, greater dyspnea, and poorer sleep quality than matched never-users despite comparable resting spirometry, and these hypothesis-generating findings warrant longitudinal evaluation with biochemical exposure verification.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.