Limitations of current neuroprotective therapies in dementia with Lewy bodies.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Deirdre M O'shea, Shanell Disla, Alyssa E Gosling, German A Valdelamar, Magdalena Ioana Tolea, James E Galvin
{"title":"Limitations of current neuroprotective therapies in dementia with Lewy bodies.","authors":"Deirdre M O'shea, Shanell Disla, Alyssa E Gosling, German A Valdelamar, Magdalena Ioana Tolea, James E Galvin","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2026.2742316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is characterized by progressive cognitive, neuropsychiatric, motor, autonomic, and sleep impairment. Pharmacological interventions developed with disease-modifying intent have entered clinical testing, but their biological rationale and adequacy of evaluation remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This structured narrative review appraises pharmacological interventions developed with disease-modifying intent in DLB, focusing on biological rationale, central nervous system (CNS) exposure and target engagement, and whether trials adequately tested neuroprotection or altered clinical progression. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies published from January 2023 through 29 July 2026, with trial and registry reconciliation continuing through 30 July 2026. Twelve DLB trials evaluated interventions targeting endosomal signaling, kinase-related proteostasis, autophagy-lysosomal function, cellular bioenergetics, oligomer-associated synaptic injury, or neurotrophic signaling. No completed trial established neuroprotection or disease modification. Interpretation was limited by biological heterogeneity, Alzheimer disease co-pathology, incomplete CNS target-engagement evidence, short treatment duration, small samples, and endpoints unable to distinguish symptomatic effects from altered progression.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Future trials should prioritize biomarker-supported diagnosis, prospective co-pathology assessment, demonstrated CNS exposure and target engagement, and longer follow-up combining clinical and mechanism-linked outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2026.2742316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is characterized by progressive cognitive, neuropsychiatric, motor, autonomic, and sleep impairment. Pharmacological interventions developed with disease-modifying intent have entered clinical testing, but their biological rationale and adequacy of evaluation remain uncertain.

Areas covered: This structured narrative review appraises pharmacological interventions developed with disease-modifying intent in DLB, focusing on biological rationale, central nervous system (CNS) exposure and target engagement, and whether trials adequately tested neuroprotection or altered clinical progression. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies published from January 2023 through 29 July 2026, with trial and registry reconciliation continuing through 30 July 2026. Twelve DLB trials evaluated interventions targeting endosomal signaling, kinase-related proteostasis, autophagy-lysosomal function, cellular bioenergetics, oligomer-associated synaptic injury, or neurotrophic signaling. No completed trial established neuroprotection or disease modification. Interpretation was limited by biological heterogeneity, Alzheimer disease co-pathology, incomplete CNS target-engagement evidence, short treatment duration, small samples, and endpoints unable to distinguish symptomatic effects from altered progression.

Expert opinion: Future trials should prioritize biomarker-supported diagnosis, prospective co-pathology assessment, demonstrated CNS exposure and target engagement, and longer follow-up combining clinical and mechanism-linked outcomes.

当前神经保护疗法在路易体痴呆中的局限性。
导语:路易体痴呆(DLB)以进行性认知、神经精神、运动、自主神经和睡眠障碍为特征。以改善疾病为目的的药物干预已进入临床试验,但其生物学原理和评估的充分性仍不确定。涵盖领域:这篇结构化的叙述性综述评估了以改善DLB疾病为目的开发的药物干预措施,重点关注生物学原理、中枢神经系统(CNS)暴露和靶标参与,以及试验是否充分测试了神经保护或改变了临床进展。检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库,检索了2023年1月至2026年7月29日发表的研究,并对试验和注册库进行了核对,直至2026年7月30日。12项DLB试验评估了针对内体信号传导、激酶相关蛋白酶抑制、自噬-溶酶体功能、细胞生物能量学、低聚物相关突触损伤或神经营养信号传导的干预措施。没有完成的试验确定神经保护或疾病改善。生物学异质性、阿尔茨海默病共病理、不完整的中枢神经系统靶标结合证据、治疗时间短、样本小以及无法区分症状效应和改变的进展的终点限制了解释。专家意见:未来的试验应优先考虑生物标志物支持的诊断,前瞻性共同病理评估,证明中枢神经系统暴露和靶标参与,以及结合临床和机制相关结果的更长随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书