Chronic low back pain: assessment of mental distress, quality of life and pain-related activity patterns.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lucie Sikorová, Andrea Polanská, Renáta Zoubková, Jan Divák, Alena Mátlová, Michal Parma
{"title":"Chronic low back pain: assessment of mental distress, quality of life and pain-related activity patterns.","authors":"Lucie Sikorová, Andrea Polanská, Renáta Zoubková, Jan Divák, Alena Mátlová, Michal Parma","doi":"10.21101/cejph.a8736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess mental health, quality of life, and patterns of physical activity in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), to compare these outcomes across socio-demographic factors, and to evaluate their relationship with subjectively perceived pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. The research sample included 151 patients with chronic low back pain treated at a Pain Management Centre. Data were collected using the Numeric Rating Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain scale, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depression was identified in 48.3% of patients and anxiety in 45.7%. Depression was more prevalent among those receiving disability pensions (p = 0.048), and anxiety was more common in patients treated with pharmacological therapy alone (p = 0.014). Activity avoidance emerged as the dominant activity pattern, and 50.3% of patients reported a moderate level of physical activity. Patients with higher education reported better health satisfaction (p = 0.035). Average pain intensity showed weak negative correlations with overall quality of life (τ = -0.23, p = 0.001), health satisfaction (τ = -0.20, p = 0.004), physical health (τ = -0.21, p = 0.001), and psychological health (τ = -0.18, p = 0.003), and positive correlations with depression (τ = 0.15, p = 0.018) and anxiety (τ = 0.16, p = 0.008). Least pain intensity was negatively associated with physical activity (τ = -0.13, p = 0.034), while average pain intensity was positively associated with activity avoidance (τ = 0.13, p = 0.030).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings support the importance of a comprehensive approach to CLBP management that considers psychological distress, physical activity, and pain-related activity patterns alongside pain intensity. Individually tailored management strategies addressing these dimensions may contribute to more comprehensive care for patients with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":9823,"journal":{"name":"Central European journal of public health","volume":"34 3","pages":"196-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a8736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess mental health, quality of life, and patterns of physical activity in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), to compare these outcomes across socio-demographic factors, and to evaluate their relationship with subjectively perceived pain.

Methods: A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. The research sample included 151 patients with chronic low back pain treated at a Pain Management Centre. Data were collected using the Numeric Rating Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain scale, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Results: Depression was identified in 48.3% of patients and anxiety in 45.7%. Depression was more prevalent among those receiving disability pensions (p = 0.048), and anxiety was more common in patients treated with pharmacological therapy alone (p = 0.014). Activity avoidance emerged as the dominant activity pattern, and 50.3% of patients reported a moderate level of physical activity. Patients with higher education reported better health satisfaction (p = 0.035). Average pain intensity showed weak negative correlations with overall quality of life (τ = -0.23, p = 0.001), health satisfaction (τ = -0.20, p = 0.004), physical health (τ = -0.21, p = 0.001), and psychological health (τ = -0.18, p = 0.003), and positive correlations with depression (τ = 0.15, p = 0.018) and anxiety (τ = 0.16, p = 0.008). Least pain intensity was negatively associated with physical activity (τ = -0.13, p = 0.034), while average pain intensity was positively associated with activity avoidance (τ = 0.13, p = 0.030).

Conclusions: The findings support the importance of a comprehensive approach to CLBP management that considers psychological distress, physical activity, and pain-related activity patterns alongside pain intensity. Individually tailored management strategies addressing these dimensions may contribute to more comprehensive care for patients with CLBP.

慢性腰痛:精神痛苦、生活质量和疼痛相关活动模式的评估。
目的:本研究的目的是评估慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者的心理健康、生活质量和身体活动模式,通过社会人口统计学因素比较这些结果,并评估它们与主观感知疼痛的关系。方法:采用定量描述性横断面研究。研究样本包括151名在疼痛管理中心接受治疗的慢性腰痛患者。采用数字评定量表、医院焦虑抑郁量表、WHOQOL-BREF问卷、活动测量模式-疼痛量表和国际体育活动问卷收集数据。结果:48.3%的患者存在抑郁,45.7%的患者存在焦虑。在领取残疾抚恤金的患者中,抑郁更为普遍(p = 0.048),而在仅接受药物治疗的患者中,焦虑更为常见(p = 0.014)。活动避免成为主要的活动模式,50.3%的患者报告有中等水平的身体活动。高学历患者健康满意度较高(p = 0.035)。平均疼痛强度与整体生活质量(τ = -0.23, p = 0.001)、健康满意度(τ = -0.20, p = 0.004)、身体健康(τ = -0.21, p = 0.001)和心理健康(τ = -0.18, p = 0.003)呈弱负相关,与抑郁(τ = 0.15, p = 0.018)和焦虑(τ = 0.16, p = 0.008)呈正相关。最小疼痛强度与体力活动呈负相关(τ = -0.13, p = 0.034),而平均疼痛强度与活动回避呈正相关(τ = 0.13, p = 0.030)。结论:研究结果支持综合治疗CLBP的重要性,包括心理困扰、身体活动、疼痛相关活动模式以及疼痛强度。针对这些方面的个性化管理策略可能有助于CLBP患者的更全面的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European journal of public health
Central European journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original articles on disease prevention and health protection, environmental impacts on health, the role of nutrition in health promotion, results of population health studies and critiques of specific health issues including intervention measures such as vaccination and its effectiveness. The review articles are targeted at providing up-to-date information in the sphere of public health. The Journal is geographically targeted at the European region but will accept specialised articles from foreign sources that contribute to public health issues also applicable to the European cultural milieu.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书