{"title":"Multidisciplinary Care Model for Differences in Sex Development: An Implementation Research Study.","authors":"Sukanya Priyadarshini, Ankesh Singh, Kaushal Kulkarni, Devendra Kumar Yadav, Rajesh Sagar, Rajni Sharma, Minu Bajpai, Vandana Jain","doi":"10.1111/cen.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To initiate a multidisciplinary care model for patients with differences in sex development (MD-DSD), assess its implementation, and evaluate changes in perceived quality of care following implementation among parents and health-care providers (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Implementation research.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care Institute at New Delhi.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients aged 0-22 years with DSD, receiving care in single-specialty clinics at the Institute.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A core MD-DSD team comprising specialists from Paediatric Endocrinology, Paediatric Surgery and Psychiatry was formed. Multidisciplinary clinics were conducted monthly, and board meetings for difficult cases were held bi-monthly, with participation from all core and requisite allied specialties.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was successful implementation of MD-DSD clinics and board meetings, defined by representation from all three core specialties. Secondary outcomes included changes in the Perceived Quality-of-Care Questionnaire (PQCQ) scores (administered to parents at baseline and after attending two clinics, score range: 9-45), and perceptions of participating HCPs at study completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 28 months, 28 clinics and 13 meetings were held. A total of 188 patients (46,XX DSD, 69; 46,XY DSD, 104; and sex chromosome DSD, 15) attended the MD-DSD clinics; and 44 of these were also reviewed in MD-DSD meetings, predominantly for concerns relating to gender of rearing and decision on surgical intervention. Participation from all core specialties was present in 26 (93%) clinics and 12 (92%) meetings. The PQCQ scores (N = 79) improved from 32.2 ± 5.7 to 36.4 ± 4.5 (p < 0.001), contributed chiefly by improved parent knowledge and attention to psychosocial needs. The participating HCPs (N = 12/15) believed that the model was sustainable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MD-DSD care model was feasible and demonstrated favourable perceived sustainability, with improvement in the perceived quality of care reported by both parents and HCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10346,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.70211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To initiate a multidisciplinary care model for patients with differences in sex development (MD-DSD), assess its implementation, and evaluate changes in perceived quality of care following implementation among parents and health-care providers (HCPs).
Design: Implementation research.
Setting: Tertiary care Institute at New Delhi.
Patients: Patients aged 0-22 years with DSD, receiving care in single-specialty clinics at the Institute.
Interventions: A core MD-DSD team comprising specialists from Paediatric Endocrinology, Paediatric Surgery and Psychiatry was formed. Multidisciplinary clinics were conducted monthly, and board meetings for difficult cases were held bi-monthly, with participation from all core and requisite allied specialties.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was successful implementation of MD-DSD clinics and board meetings, defined by representation from all three core specialties. Secondary outcomes included changes in the Perceived Quality-of-Care Questionnaire (PQCQ) scores (administered to parents at baseline and after attending two clinics, score range: 9-45), and perceptions of participating HCPs at study completion.
Results: Over 28 months, 28 clinics and 13 meetings were held. A total of 188 patients (46,XX DSD, 69; 46,XY DSD, 104; and sex chromosome DSD, 15) attended the MD-DSD clinics; and 44 of these were also reviewed in MD-DSD meetings, predominantly for concerns relating to gender of rearing and decision on surgical intervention. Participation from all core specialties was present in 26 (93%) clinics and 12 (92%) meetings. The PQCQ scores (N = 79) improved from 32.2 ± 5.7 to 36.4 ± 4.5 (p < 0.001), contributed chiefly by improved parent knowledge and attention to psychosocial needs. The participating HCPs (N = 12/15) believed that the model was sustainable.
Conclusions: The MD-DSD care model was feasible and demonstrated favourable perceived sustainability, with improvement in the perceived quality of care reported by both parents and HCPs.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Endocrinology publishes papers and reviews which focus on the clinical aspects of endocrinology, including the clinical application of molecular endocrinology. It does not publish papers relating directly to diabetes care and clinical management. It features reviews, original papers, commentaries, correspondence and Clinical Questions. Clinical Endocrinology is essential reading not only for those engaged in endocrinological research but also for those involved primarily in clinical practice.