Efficacy of non-selective beta blockers in the treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yiqi Shi, Quanfeng Zhang, Xianfu Hu, Jiangang Shen, Pi Liu
{"title":"Efficacy of non-selective beta blockers in the treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yiqi Shi, Quanfeng Zhang, Xianfu Hu, Jiangang Shen, Pi Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.aohep.2026.102457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Non-selective beta blockers (NSBBs) are beneficial for people with chronic liver diseases by reducing portal pressure. However, the benefit of NSBB treatment in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of NSBBs in ACLF patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 5, 2025. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies. Effect estimates were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcome was overall mortality, while secondary outcomes were 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2007 articles identified, six articles were included. The pooled mortality was 48.9% in the NSBB group compared to 67.4% in the non-NSBB group (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91, p<0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 27%). One-month mortality (RR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.52-0.84; p<0.01), 3-month mortality (RR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.77-0.97; p = 0.01), and 12-month mortality (RR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75-0.93; p<0.01) in the NSBB group were significantly lower than those in the non-NSBB group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that NSBBs are associated with improvement in the short term (1-month) and 1-year survival outcomes in patients with ACLF. However, further studies with more evidence are required to support these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7979,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"102457"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2026.102457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Non-selective beta blockers (NSBBs) are beneficial for people with chronic liver diseases by reducing portal pressure. However, the benefit of NSBB treatment in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of NSBBs in ACLF patients.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 5, 2025. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies. Effect estimates were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcome was overall mortality, while secondary outcomes were 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month mortality.

Results: Of the 2007 articles identified, six articles were included. The pooled mortality was 48.9% in the NSBB group compared to 67.4% in the non-NSBB group (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91, p<0.01, I2 = 27%). One-month mortality (RR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.52-0.84; p<0.01), 3-month mortality (RR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.77-0.97; p = 0.01), and 12-month mortality (RR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75-0.93; p<0.01) in the NSBB group were significantly lower than those in the non-NSBB group.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that NSBBs are associated with improvement in the short term (1-month) and 1-year survival outcomes in patients with ACLF. However, further studies with more evidence are required to support these findings.

非选择性受体阻滞剂治疗急性慢性肝衰竭的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介和目的:非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBBs)通过降低门静脉压力对慢性肝病患者有益。然而,NSBB治疗急性慢性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者的益处仍存在争议。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在探讨nsbb对ACLF患者的疗效。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,截止到2025年12月5日。纳入研究的质量采用修订后的Cochrane协作随机对照试验偏倚风险工具和队列研究的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。效果估计以95%可信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)报告。主要结局是总死亡率,次要结局是1个月、3个月和12个月的死亡率。结果:在被识别的2007篇文章中,有6篇文章被纳入。NSBB组的总死亡率为48.9%,非NSBB组为67.4% (RR = 0.81,95% CI: 0.73-0.91, p2 = 27%)。1个月死亡率(RR = 0.66,95%CI: 0.52-0.84)结论:本荟萃分析表明,NSBBs与ACLF患者短期(1个月)和1年生存结局的改善相关。然而,需要有更多证据的进一步研究来支持这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of hepatology
Annals of hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Hepatology publishes original research on the biology and diseases of the liver in both humans and experimental models. Contributions may be submitted as regular articles. The journal also publishes concise reviews of both basic and clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书