Large Language Models as a Clinical Interface for Predictive Modeling: A Feasibility Study in Pediatric Appendicitis.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jesse P Caron, Oscar Rodriguez, Leila Raden, William Cobb, Jeffrey Lu, Shelby Harris, Daniel Rozefort, Scott W Bloom, Lindsey Armstrong
{"title":"Large Language Models as a Clinical Interface for Predictive Modeling: A Feasibility Study in Pediatric Appendicitis.","authors":"Jesse P Caron, Oscar Rodriguez, Leila Raden, William Cobb, Jeffrey Lu, Shelby Harris, Daniel Rozefort, Scott W Bloom, Lindsey Armstrong","doi":"10.1177/00031348261480836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in clinical data workflows, but most clinicians lack the time, training, or support to build predictive models. We evaluated whether a ChatGPT-assisted workflow could enable clinicians to independently construct and execute a basic predictive model using routine perioperative data, using postoperative length of stay (LOS) in pediatric appendicitis as a feasibility use case.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 228 children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Ten routinely available preoperative variables were used. ChatGPT guided preprocessing and generated code for linear regression and random forest models using naïve and structured prompting. Models were trained using an 80/20 split and evaluated using MAE, RMSE, r, and R<sup>2</sup>.ResultsNaïve prompting performed poorly, while structured prompting improved model performance (MAE 0.34, RMSE 0.85, r 0.85). On the test set, linear regression achieved MAE 1.00 and random forest 0.77. Identified variables reflected expected clinical patterns. These findings demonstrate internal consistency of the workflow rather than new predictive insight.ConclusionsA structured ChatGPT workflow enabled clinicians to construct standard predictive models using routine data. These findings support feasibility of clinician-directed model development, but not clinical utility, of LLM-enabled workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261480836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261480836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in clinical data workflows, but most clinicians lack the time, training, or support to build predictive models. We evaluated whether a ChatGPT-assisted workflow could enable clinicians to independently construct and execute a basic predictive model using routine perioperative data, using postoperative length of stay (LOS) in pediatric appendicitis as a feasibility use case.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 228 children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Ten routinely available preoperative variables were used. ChatGPT guided preprocessing and generated code for linear regression and random forest models using naïve and structured prompting. Models were trained using an 80/20 split and evaluated using MAE, RMSE, r, and R2.ResultsNaïve prompting performed poorly, while structured prompting improved model performance (MAE 0.34, RMSE 0.85, r 0.85). On the test set, linear regression achieved MAE 1.00 and random forest 0.77. Identified variables reflected expected clinical patterns. These findings demonstrate internal consistency of the workflow rather than new predictive insight.ConclusionsA structured ChatGPT workflow enabled clinicians to construct standard predictive models using routine data. These findings support feasibility of clinician-directed model development, but not clinical utility, of LLM-enabled workflows.

大型语言模型作为预测建模的临床界面:儿童阑尾炎的可行性研究。
目的:大型语言模型(llm)越来越多地用于临床数据工作流程,但大多数临床医生缺乏时间、培训或支持来构建预测模型。我们以儿童阑尾炎术后住院时间(LOS)为可行性用例,评估chatgpt辅助工作流程是否能使临床医生利用常规围手术期数据独立构建和执行基本预测模型。方法对228例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的儿童进行回顾性分析。使用10个常规术前变量。ChatGPT指导预处理,并使用naïve和结构化提示生成线性回归和随机森林模型的代码。模型使用80/20分割进行训练,并使用MAE、RMSE、r和R2进行评估。ResultsNaïve提示表现不佳,而结构化提示提高了模型性能(MAE 0.34, RMSE 0.85, r 0.85)。在测试集上,线性回归达到MAE 1.00,随机森林达到0.77。确定的变量反映了预期的临床模式。这些发现证明了工作流程的内部一致性,而不是新的预测性见解。结论结构化的ChatGPT工作流使临床医生能够使用常规数据构建标准的预测模型。这些发现支持临床指导模型开发的可行性,但不是llm工作流程的临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书