Is There an Association Between Preoperative PONV Prophylaxis With Dexamethasone and Incidence of Wound Revisions in the Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Secondary Scoliosis? A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study in 162 Patients.
Nima Taheri, Zhao Li, Zhen Wang, Konstantin Cloeren, Antonia Koch, Serafeim Tsitsilonis, Friederike Schömig, Michael Putzier, Matthias Pumberger, Paul Köhli
{"title":"Is There an Association Between Preoperative PONV Prophylaxis With Dexamethasone and Incidence of Wound Revisions in the Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Secondary Scoliosis? A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study in 162 Patients.","authors":"Nima Taheri, Zhao Li, Zhen Wang, Konstantin Cloeren, Antonia Koch, Serafeim Tsitsilonis, Friederike Schömig, Michael Putzier, Matthias Pumberger, Paul Köhli","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000002186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background data: </strong>Pediatric patients undergoing surgery for secondary scoliosis are at special risk for surgical site infections (SSIs). The application of dexamethasone (Dexa) for perioperative prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting is an established method. Despite the benefits, there is still concern regarding an increased risk for SSI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the association between perioperative Dexa administration for PONV prophylaxis and the occurrence of SSI requiring surgical revision in pediatric patients undergoing surgery for secondary scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Single-center retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients younger than 18 years undergoing surgical treatment for secondary scoliosis between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. Demographic and surgical data were extracted from medical records and discharge summaries. SSI requiring surgical reintervention was the primary outcome. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher exact test, and Fisher-Freeman-Halton test, univariable and bivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-two patients were included (Dexa: n=30, control: n=132). There were no significant differences considering demographics (P>0.05). Patients receiving Dexa underwent undergoing revision surgery more often or had meningomyelocele (MMC). The overall incidence of infection was 11/162. Patients receiving Dexa showed a higher incidence of SSI requiring surgical reintervention (6/30 vs. 5/132, P=0.01) and were at higher Odds for SSI (OR: 5.25, 95% CI: 1.53-18.15, P=0.007), which remained significant after adjusting for confounders (MMC: OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.08-14.38, P=0.033; revision surgery: OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.08-14.38, P=0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study observed an association between the preoperative application of Dexa for PONV prophylaxis in secondary scoliosis surgery and an increased risk of SSI. Our results give reason for a more thoughtful application of Dexa-based PONV prophylaxes in the perioperative therapy of a population of high-risk children for SSI with secondary scoliosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000002186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background data: Pediatric patients undergoing surgery for secondary scoliosis are at special risk for surgical site infections (SSIs). The application of dexamethasone (Dexa) for perioperative prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting is an established method. Despite the benefits, there is still concern regarding an increased risk for SSI.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between perioperative Dexa administration for PONV prophylaxis and the occurrence of SSI requiring surgical revision in pediatric patients undergoing surgery for secondary scoliosis.
Study design: Single-center retrospective cohort study.
Methods: Patients younger than 18 years undergoing surgical treatment for secondary scoliosis between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. Demographic and surgical data were extracted from medical records and discharge summaries. SSI requiring surgical reintervention was the primary outcome. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher exact test, and Fisher-Freeman-Halton test, univariable and bivariable logistic regression.
Results: One hundred sixty-two patients were included (Dexa: n=30, control: n=132). There were no significant differences considering demographics (P>0.05). Patients receiving Dexa underwent undergoing revision surgery more often or had meningomyelocele (MMC). The overall incidence of infection was 11/162. Patients receiving Dexa showed a higher incidence of SSI requiring surgical reintervention (6/30 vs. 5/132, P=0.01) and were at higher Odds for SSI (OR: 5.25, 95% CI: 1.53-18.15, P=0.007), which remained significant after adjusting for confounders (MMC: OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.08-14.38, P=0.033; revision surgery: OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.08-14.38, P=0.033).
Conclusions: This study observed an association between the preoperative application of Dexa for PONV prophylaxis in secondary scoliosis surgery and an increased risk of SSI. Our results give reason for a more thoughtful application of Dexa-based PONV prophylaxes in the perioperative therapy of a population of high-risk children for SSI with secondary scoliosis.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.