Navigating academic integrity in the Era of generative AI: a systematic literature review

Batool Hendal, Gobinda Chowdhury
{"title":"Navigating academic integrity in the Era of generative AI: a systematic literature review","authors":"Batool Hendal,&nbsp;Gobinda Chowdhury","doi":"10.1007/s43681-026-01431-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a comprehensive overview of existing research on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) within academic contexts. It aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the evolving role of GenAI in higher education institutions by identifying the dominant themes and emphasising the recommendations proposed by researchers. To achieve this purpose, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted, followed by an inductive thematic analysis to synthesise and interpret the findings. A convergent and divergent synthesis was subsequently undertaken to identify areas of agreement and debate across the reviewed literature. Based on 274 codes, six main themes were identified, including the potential benefits of GenAI, potential disadvantages of GenAI, GenAI and language, AI text detectors, policies and governance, and recommendations for responsible GenAI adoption. Grounded in the main recommendations identified across the literature, the study proposes an Academic GenAI Adaptation Framework, organised into two core dimensions: GenAI Governance and Infrastructure, and GenAI Education and Literacy. The framework provides higher education institutions with a practical roadmap for the strategic, ethical, and responsible integration of GenAI while safeguarding academic integrity.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-026-01431-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-026-01431-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive overview of existing research on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) within academic contexts. It aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the evolving role of GenAI in higher education institutions by identifying the dominant themes and emphasising the recommendations proposed by researchers. To achieve this purpose, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted, followed by an inductive thematic analysis to synthesise and interpret the findings. A convergent and divergent synthesis was subsequently undertaken to identify areas of agreement and debate across the reviewed literature. Based on 274 codes, six main themes were identified, including the potential benefits of GenAI, potential disadvantages of GenAI, GenAI and language, AI text detectors, policies and governance, and recommendations for responsible GenAI adoption. Grounded in the main recommendations identified across the literature, the study proposes an Academic GenAI Adaptation Framework, organised into two core dimensions: GenAI Governance and Infrastructure, and GenAI Education and Literacy. The framework provides higher education institutions with a practical roadmap for the strategic, ethical, and responsible integration of GenAI while safeguarding academic integrity.

Graphical abstract

生成式人工智能时代的学术诚信导航:系统文献综述
本研究全面概述了在学术背景下使用生成人工智能(GenAI)的现有研究。它旨在通过确定主要主题和强调研究人员提出的建议,对GenAI在高等教育机构中不断发展的作用提供细致入微的理解。为了达到这一目的,进行了系统文献综述(SLR),随后进行了归纳性专题分析,以综合和解释研究结果。随后进行了趋同和发散综合,以确定在所审查的文献中一致和争论的领域。基于274个规范,确定了六个主要主题,包括GenAI的潜在好处、GenAI的潜在缺点、GenAI和语言、AI文本检测器、政策和治理以及负责任的GenAI采用建议。基于文献中确定的主要建议,该研究提出了一个学术的基因适应框架,它被组织成两个核心维度:基因治理和基础设施,以及基因教育和扫盲。该框架为高等教育机构在维护学术诚信的同时,在战略上、道德上和负责任的整合GenAI提供了一个实用的路线图。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书