Renato Matteotti, Giovanni Dalla Vecchia, Andrea Masotti, Luca Monticelli, Michele Nardi, Lorenzo Fiore
{"title":"Peri-periprosthetic femoral fractures: a single-centre case series of a rare and challenging clinical scenario.","authors":"Renato Matteotti, Giovanni Dalla Vecchia, Andrea Masotti, Luca Monticelli, Michele Nardi, Lorenzo Fiore","doi":"10.1007/s00068-026-03340-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are an increasingly common complication of hip arthroplasty. A poorly defined scenario is a new femoral fracture after a previously treated PFF has united, which we term a peri-periprosthetic femoral fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 154 surgically treated PFF episodes in patients aged over 65 years at our institution between 2011 and 2021. A peri-periprosthetic fracture was defined as a new acute femoral fracture after documented radiographic union of a previously treated PFF. Clinical, surgical, and radiographic data were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven patients (4.5% of the institutional PFF cohort) met the criteria. Mean age was 83.1 years and 6 (85.7%) were female. The mean interval to the peri-periprosthetic fracture was 37.3 months (median 27; range 7-105). By the Vancouver classification, 3 fractures were type B1, 1 type B3, and 3 type C. Treatment was individualised to fracture configuration, prosthetic stability, hardware, and bone stock. Radiographic union was documented in all 4 patients with adequate follow-up, at a mean of 4.3 months. Five patients regained ambulation; one with pre-existing limitations did not, and ambulatory status was unavailable for one. Medical complications occurred in 2 patients, and no major orthopaedic complication required reoperation. Mortality was 14.3% at one year and 42.9% at two years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peri-periprosthetic femoral fractures constitute a rare and technically demanding scenario, distinct from delayed union, nonunion, refracture through an incompletely healed fracture, and fixation failure. Treatment should be individualised to prosthetic stability, pre-existing hardware, fracture morphology, and residual bone stock.</p>","PeriodicalId":520620,"journal":{"name":"European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-026-03340-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are an increasingly common complication of hip arthroplasty. A poorly defined scenario is a new femoral fracture after a previously treated PFF has united, which we term a peri-periprosthetic femoral fracture.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 154 surgically treated PFF episodes in patients aged over 65 years at our institution between 2011 and 2021. A peri-periprosthetic fracture was defined as a new acute femoral fracture after documented radiographic union of a previously treated PFF. Clinical, surgical, and radiographic data were reviewed.
Results: Seven patients (4.5% of the institutional PFF cohort) met the criteria. Mean age was 83.1 years and 6 (85.7%) were female. The mean interval to the peri-periprosthetic fracture was 37.3 months (median 27; range 7-105). By the Vancouver classification, 3 fractures were type B1, 1 type B3, and 3 type C. Treatment was individualised to fracture configuration, prosthetic stability, hardware, and bone stock. Radiographic union was documented in all 4 patients with adequate follow-up, at a mean of 4.3 months. Five patients regained ambulation; one with pre-existing limitations did not, and ambulatory status was unavailable for one. Medical complications occurred in 2 patients, and no major orthopaedic complication required reoperation. Mortality was 14.3% at one year and 42.9% at two years.
Conclusion: Peri-periprosthetic femoral fractures constitute a rare and technically demanding scenario, distinct from delayed union, nonunion, refracture through an incompletely healed fracture, and fixation failure. Treatment should be individualised to prosthetic stability, pre-existing hardware, fracture morphology, and residual bone stock.