Underutilization of Follow-Up Imaging Among Incarcerated Patients: Retrospective Analysis of Adherence to Radiologic Recommendations.

Yu Sakai, Daniel Lee, Regina O Redfern, Tessa S Cook, Rose Onyeali, Colbey W Freeman
{"title":"Underutilization of Follow-Up Imaging Among Incarcerated Patients: Retrospective Analysis of Adherence to Radiologic Recommendations.","authors":"Yu Sakai, Daniel Lee, Regina O Redfern, Tessa S Cook, Rose Onyeali, Colbey W Freeman","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2026.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate adherence to radiology follow-up recommendations for incarcerated patients and characterize follow-up pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study identified radiology reports for incarcerated individuals evaluated in emergency department (ED) or inpatient settings from January 2017 through November 2024. Incarceration status was based on correctional facility addresses, phone numbers, or incarceration-related discharge flags from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware in the electronic medical record. Reports were initially screened with text-based query for \"recommend\" and/or \"follow-up.\" Two radiologists manually reviewed candidate reports. Eligibility required a definitive recommendation for follow-up imaging, endoscopy, and/or biopsy. Analyses of adherence to recommended timing were restricted to recommendations with an interpretable follow-up interval. Adherence was defined as completion from 30 days before through 60 days after the recommended interval. Follow-up was categorized as outpatient follow-up, incidental follow-up during subsequent ED visits or readmissions, or completion during the index encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 15,680 accessions, initial text query identified 1,891 records, and manual review yielded 243 final eligible reports from 164 patients. Of these reports, 140 had interpretable follow-up intervals, and 12 (8.6%) had outpatient completion within the adherence window. Any follow-up was documented at our institution in 81 out of 243 (33.3%); 29 (11.9%) outpatient follow-up; 27 (11.1%) completed incidentally during later ED visits or readmissions; 25 (10.3%) during the initial encounter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful outpatient follow-up of recommendations from radiology reports for incarcerated patients in ED/inpatient settings occurred in less than one in ten cases, lower than reported in broader populations. Dedicated closed-loop pathways may be needed to improve continuity for this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2026.10.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate adherence to radiology follow-up recommendations for incarcerated patients and characterize follow-up pathways.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study identified radiology reports for incarcerated individuals evaluated in emergency department (ED) or inpatient settings from January 2017 through November 2024. Incarceration status was based on correctional facility addresses, phone numbers, or incarceration-related discharge flags from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware in the electronic medical record. Reports were initially screened with text-based query for "recommend" and/or "follow-up." Two radiologists manually reviewed candidate reports. Eligibility required a definitive recommendation for follow-up imaging, endoscopy, and/or biopsy. Analyses of adherence to recommended timing were restricted to recommendations with an interpretable follow-up interval. Adherence was defined as completion from 30 days before through 60 days after the recommended interval. Follow-up was categorized as outpatient follow-up, incidental follow-up during subsequent ED visits or readmissions, or completion during the index encounter.

Results: Among 15,680 accessions, initial text query identified 1,891 records, and manual review yielded 243 final eligible reports from 164 patients. Of these reports, 140 had interpretable follow-up intervals, and 12 (8.6%) had outpatient completion within the adherence window. Any follow-up was documented at our institution in 81 out of 243 (33.3%); 29 (11.9%) outpatient follow-up; 27 (11.1%) completed incidentally during later ED visits or readmissions; 25 (10.3%) during the initial encounter.

Conclusions: Successful outpatient follow-up of recommendations from radiology reports for incarcerated patients in ED/inpatient settings occurred in less than one in ten cases, lower than reported in broader populations. Dedicated closed-loop pathways may be needed to improve continuity for this vulnerable population.

嵌顿患者随访影像利用不足:依从放射学建议的回顾性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书